|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: RenForums Policy [message #407461 is a reply to message #407445] |
Sun, 18 October 2009 16:22   |
 |
nikki6ixx
Messages: 2545
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Can the 99% of us who are retards get a summary because the smart 1%'s super nerdy IRC conversation is simply too long.
Renegade:
| Aircraftkiller wrote on Fri, 10 January 2014 16:56 |
The only game where everyone competes to be an e-janitor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: RenForums Policy [message #407494 is a reply to message #407445] |
Sun, 18 October 2009 23:32 |
 |
Goztow
Messages: 9737
Registered: March 2005
Location: Belgium
Karma: 13
|
General (5 Stars)
Goztoe |
|
|
What are you trying to proof?
* That we have a clear policy on what's a cheat and what isn't and that we're implementing that policy to the best of our possibilities? If so, well done.
* That there are actually people actively moderating this forum and thinking about what they feel is good for the community? If so, well done.
* That you refused to reply to my opening for getting your PM rights restored (you didn't even try to lie about it), hence basically admitting that you were / are planning to use the PM system to spread the "blacklisted" modification? If so, well done.
* That I am not reluctant to the idea of getting the community more involved in running renforums but that this won't happen overnight? If so, well done.
* That the current administration of renforums is run by one person, which you can name a dictature? It seems like stating the obvious to me. WW handed over that authority to Crimson a long time ago.
* That I should stop trying to communicate with people that I already suspected to not have any good intentions with the Renegade community? Yes, you made your point clear now. I wonder how Hex feels about your little blog entry.
I'd like to make one subtle but important change to what I said yesterday, and which you quoted so nicely. At a 2nd thought, I don't think 99 % - 1 % is an accurate figure (it's a figure u brought up in the first place and that I didn't want to contest at that time). I'd rather say 75 % of the posts on renforums are unrelated / stupid / not useful. I don't think anyone will actually disagree on this. However, I guess that without these 75 % of posts, it would become pretty much empty on here.
As you see, I can make longer posts, without copy-pasting IRC-logs.
You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
|
|
|
|
| Re: RenForums Policy [message #407499 is a reply to message #407474] |
Sun, 18 October 2009 23:42 |
 |
Altzan
Messages: 1586
Registered: September 2008
Location: Tennessee
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| luv2pb wrote on Sun, 18 October 2009 19:52 |
Interesting fact. No one cares.
|
I cannot imagine how the clockwork of the universe can exist without a clockmaker. ~Voltaire
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: RenForums Policy [message #407511 is a reply to message #407445] |
Mon, 19 October 2009 01:57 |
|
|
I fail to see what that IRC log proves, beyond what Goztow has already stated. Those are the rules (go check!) so if your issue is with that, then start a reasoned debate as to how they should be changed, bear in mind, the logic used to create that rule was:
We can't stop the spread of cheats, but we can make it harder by locking down one available channel of communication (only to those who actually spread cheats), here.
Renguard is a wonderful initiative
Toggle Spoiler
| BBC news, quoting... |
Supporters of Proposition 8 will argue California does not discriminate against gays, as the current law allows them to get married - as long as they wed a partner of the opposite sex.
|
| halokid wrote on Mon, 11 October 2010 08:46 |
| R315r4z0r wrote on Mon, 11 October 2010 15:35 |
|
the hell is that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
