|
|
|
|
|
Re: the next renegade! [message #270740 is a reply to message #270735] |
Wed, 04 July 2007 14:00 |
|
Viking
Messages: 1692 Registered: July 2005 Location: Earth
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
[NE | Fobby[GEN] wrote on Wed, 04 July 2007 15:48]ETKkillr wrote on Wed, 04 July 2007 16:46 | its not out yet duh
|
No man, it literally does not exist anymore. There's no Renegade 2
|
There is Ren 07 and its gonna kick ass!
QUOTES
"The Renegade community revolves around having something awesome, and not sharing it so you can be on top of the mountain." -Canadacdn
Crimson wrote on Thu, 17 May 2007 05:22 |
Memphis wrote on Tue, 15 May 2007 03:54 | ...fatally die to death...
|
I don't know if you meant to do that, but triple redundancy for teh win. I LOL'ed.
|
Awesome l337 people= Icedog90, Blazea58, Canadacdn, Crimson, jonwil
|
|
|
Re: the next renegade! [message #270742 is a reply to message #270616] |
Wed, 04 July 2007 14:05 |
|
sadukar09
Messages: 2812 Registered: May 2007 Location: Ottawa,Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
can we kick this guy off the internet?
Quote: | [19:16:48] <APBBR> @ryan3k: THE ENFIELD DEFIES THE LAWS OF PHYSICS BECAUSE THE BULLETS INSTANTLY HIT THEIR TARGETS LOL
[19:16:52] <APBBR> @ryan3k: CHRONO TECHNOLOGY IN TEH BULLETS
|
Quote: | [22:48]<APBBR> @V0LK0V: AOL COMING UR WAI K
[22:48] <APBBR> Host: Quitting due to Westwood Online connection loss.
|
|
|
|
Re: the next renegade! [message #270748 is a reply to message #270616] |
Wed, 04 July 2007 14:21 |
|
Viking
Messages: 1692 Registered: July 2005 Location: Earth
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
I don't think we have the authority, maybe crimson can!?
QUOTES
"The Renegade community revolves around having something awesome, and not sharing it so you can be on top of the mountain." -Canadacdn
Crimson wrote on Thu, 17 May 2007 05:22 |
Memphis wrote on Tue, 15 May 2007 03:54 | ...fatally die to death...
|
I don't know if you meant to do that, but triple redundancy for teh win. I LOL'ed.
|
Awesome l337 people= Icedog90, Blazea58, Canadacdn, Crimson, jonwil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: the next renegade! [message #270835 is a reply to message #270828] |
Wed, 04 July 2007 21:54 |
Romaner
Messages: 355 Registered: January 2007 Location: edmonton, canada
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
Fobby wrote on Wed, 04 July 2007 22:32 | I'd rather just have a new one. 5 and a half years is a very long life for a small and unpopular game like Renegade. I'm sure EA's surprised that this community still exists - not like there were any significant patches or traces of support throughout these years.
Just bring me a new C&C FPS that is like Renegade (fast/fluid/fun, MCT's, PT's, Credits, Bases, etc.) and I'll be very satisfied.
Meanwhile, I'll work on Ren 07 to fulfill that dream
|
qft
[Updated on: Wed, 04 July 2007 21:56] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: the next renegade! [message #270885 is a reply to message #270616] |
Thu, 05 July 2007 04:54 |
|
Oblivion165
Messages: 3468 Registered: June 2003 Location: Hendersonville, North Car...
Karma: 0
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
It's EA guys....if they make a fps it will not be what we want, it will be what they can reuse from another game. It will probably be on that damned unreal engine too. Gah I hate that engine, ruining my Turok.
Oh lets add vehicles and make turok a modern commando that has a squadron....damn you buena vista!!! His alias was turok to hide his family blood line but now you made it his actual name! Gah! Joshua Fireseed, what is wrong with that? Now its Josh Turok....JOSH TUROK!!! Josh F'in Turok??? what the hell is that? oh and also lets put Turok on the unreal engine so he can quad jump and have low grav. Not to mention everything looks exactly the same as everything else on that engine...Bah, Gah and Pfft.
I'm going to make buena vista and ea both lay in a ditch and shoot them both.
WOL: Ob165ion Skype: Oblivion165 Yahoo Instant Messenger: CaptainJohn165
|
|
|
Re: the next renegade! [message #270891 is a reply to message #270616] |
Thu, 05 July 2007 05:29 |
|
sadukar09
Messages: 2812 Registered: May 2007 Location: Ottawa,Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
they are probably gonna make another shitty Battlefield game
Quote: | [19:16:48] <APBBR> @ryan3k: THE ENFIELD DEFIES THE LAWS OF PHYSICS BECAUSE THE BULLETS INSTANTLY HIT THEIR TARGETS LOL
[19:16:52] <APBBR> @ryan3k: CHRONO TECHNOLOGY IN TEH BULLETS
|
Quote: | [22:48]<APBBR> @V0LK0V: AOL COMING UR WAI K
[22:48] <APBBR> Host: Quitting due to Westwood Online connection loss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: the next renegade! [message #270917 is a reply to message #270891] |
Thu, 05 July 2007 08:05 |
|
Starbuzz
Messages: 2500 Registered: May 2007
Karma: 2
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
Even if EA is/will consider a Renegade or C&C FPS, it will still be hard for me to believe that they will actually move forward with it. It they do it, then great.
FPS games are now (they have been always) very competitive among themselves...EA would expect money to come in. I am pretty sure that the game will do very well in the C&C community but remember that, as any gamemaker would, EA will target it to the whole gaming community...especially the FPS gamers.
This brings to another problem. There are thousands of gamers who are not fans of Command & Conquer. I have had a couple of friends who bought Renegade, played it, and threw it. They said a lot of things about why they did not like it.
Judging from their answers, I realized that they had no connection with C&C games in general. They did not understand the big picture of what goes on in the C&C universe.
This lack of knowledge of the C&C storyline came back to mess their Renegade experience.
They merely knew that Nod was the bad guys and GDI was the good. So the whole WW marketing slogan "get on the ground level of C&C" did not work out for these guys because they have never played the RTS games. And this was not just my friends, but thousands of other gamers as well.
For example, I remember the most breathtaking moment in Renegade for me...the start of the second Single Player mission (Rescue and Retribution) where the camera zooms in from above over the original C&C level...the landing on the beach. It was awesome, thrilling, and amazing! But since these guys never played the RTS, they were left complaining of why a crappy texture animation came on for a moment. Kane was just another bad guy for them...not the god-like antagonist we all know he is. You see why Renegade did not take off?
And this was not just my friends, this happened everywhere...causal gamers and FPS fanatics who bought it were turned off by it.
This disconnect from the storyline and their lack of familiarity with C&C in general hurt Renegade so much and halted it's growth. The game thrived on the faithful C&C community but not with casual gamers who were looking for a good shooter they can pick up and play with good graphics and so on. So no wonder the money did not come in.
So Renegade will be what I think it is: an awesome and beautiful one-of-a-kind parting "thank you" gift to the dedicated fans of Command & Conquer from Westwood...who we all love to death.
[Updated on: Thu, 05 July 2007 08:27] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Re: the next renegade! [message #270998 is a reply to message #270917] |
Thu, 05 July 2007 15:44 |
|
futura83
Messages: 1285 Registered: July 2006 Location: England
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) Viva la Resistance! |
|
|
BuzzOfTheStar wrote on Thu, 05 July 2007 16:05 | Even if EA is/will consider a Renegade or C&C FPS, it will still be hard for me to believe that they will actually move forward with it. It they do it, then great.
FPS games are now (they have been always) very competitive among themselves...EA would expect money to come in. I am pretty sure that the game will do very well in the C&C community but remember that, as any gamemaker would, EA will target it to the whole gaming community...especially the FPS gamers.
This brings to another problem. There are thousands of gamers who are not fans of Command & Conquer. I have had a couple of friends who bought Renegade, played it, and threw it. They said a lot of things about why they did not like it.
Judging from their answers, I realized that they had no connection with C&C games in general. They did not understand the big picture of what goes on in the C&C universe.
This lack of knowledge of the C&C storyline came back to mess their Renegade experience.
They merely knew that Nod was the bad guys and GDI was the good. So the whole WW marketing slogan "get on the ground level of C&C" did not work out for these guys because they have never played the RTS games. And this was not just my friends, but thousands of other gamers as well.
For example, I remember the most breathtaking moment in Renegade for me...the start of the second Single Player mission (Rescue and Retribution) where the camera zooms in from above over the original C&C level...the landing on the beach. It was awesome, thrilling, and amazing! But since these guys never played the RTS, they were left complaining of why a crappy texture animation came on for a moment. Kane was just another bad guy for them...not the god-like antagonist we all know he is. You see why Renegade did not take off?
And this was not just my friends, this happened everywhere...causal gamers and FPS fanatics who bought it were turned off by it.
This disconnect from the storyline and their lack of familiarity with C&C in general hurt Renegade so much and halted it's growth. The game thrived on the faithful C&C community but not with casual gamers who were looking for a good shooter they can pick up and play with good graphics and so on. So no wonder the money did not come in.
So Renegade will be what I think it is: an awesome and beautiful one-of-a-kind parting "thank you" gift to the dedicated fans of Command & Conquer from Westwood...who we all love to death.
|
Hmm, i see what you mean.
Only to the non-C&C person it seems that NOD are the bad guys, but to people that have played the others, NOD are the good guys, and GDI evil, but others will see it the other way around.
That is what is so good about C&C; there is no definate good Vs evil, and the 2 factions major differences lie in their intentions with what to do with tiberium...
This is a signature. Reading this is wasting your time.
|
|
|