Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » America Makes "Gay Bomb"
|
|
|
|
| America Makes "Gay Bomb" [message #133563] |
Sat, 22 January 2005 15:25   |
 |
cowmisfit
Messages: 2035
Registered: May 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| warranto |
It was meant to sound stupid. Sipmply because it IS true, yetpeople seem to be ignoring that fact when they bring across things like "You don't know how American's feel because of terrorist actions!" (or some variation thereof).
My point being there have been major terrorist acts around the world (perhaps nothing as dramatic as 9/11), yet no "war on terrorism" was declared by America. I don't intend for that statement to be regarded as an insult, rather the point in reference.
|
Such as the bombings in kenya ect, we gave AID and such, we have gave AID to the isrelies in there war on stopping palistien terrorist from killing there citizens. We always help when a major "terrorist" attack is commited, however it would only make sense that once they come to our soil, ecpecially in the way they did , its our responsibility to counter-attack.
Other nations that have been attacked COULD launch a war on terror if they wished, and we would back them 100% (even if it was france) they simpley choose not too and to let themselves contine to be under attack.
|
|
|
|
| America Makes "Gay Bomb" [message #133579] |
Sat, 22 January 2005 15:46 |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Cowmisfit, tell me now, what is wrong with France?
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
| America Makes "Gay Bomb" [message #133584] |
Sat, 22 January 2005 15:55 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
That was for the last thread, it suffices to say that you wore on me.
Now, explain yourself.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
| America Makes "Gay Bomb" [message #133585] |
Sat, 22 January 2005 15:56 |
Spoony_old
Messages: 1105
Registered: December 2004
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| =[DT |
=gbull=[L]=]This may sound bad. But I hope Canada and the UK get hit so you people realize Cowmisfits and My passion for hating terrorists.
|
You're right. It sounds bad.
| =[DT |
=gbull=[L]=]Examples of what happens when you wake the Sleeping Giant:
Hiroshima
Nagasaki
|
You used those as examples, the only two occasions a nuclear weapon has ever been used with the intent of death and destruction. The perpretrator: the USA.
Now, you might think an atomic bomb is just a big bomb which kills people. Yes, it does that. It also fucks up ecosystems, irradiates the ground, causes ecological catastrophes. In some areas of Japan, babies are still born with cancer.
And that's something we can all be proud of.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| America Makes "Gay Bomb" [message #133590] |
Sat, 22 January 2005 16:10 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
It's a phrase usually associated with the English language. But I suppose you wouldn't understand.
Now, why do you hate the French?
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
| America Makes "Gay Bomb" [message #133593] |
Sat, 22 January 2005 16:37 |
 |
glyde51
Messages: 1827
Registered: August 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Maybe the French goverment doesn't want to go into the War of Oil, I mean War on Terror.
No. Seriously. No.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| America Makes "Gay Bomb" [message #133597] |
Sat, 22 January 2005 16:51 |
 |
DaveGMM
Messages: 484
Registered: February 2003
Location: England, UK
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
| cowmisfit |
A) They did not support our war on terror, they didn't send anyone to reagans funneral, they do not support us in anything until they can make money or get something out of it, they were in cohoots with saddam, they support terrori in my mind by not going into Iraq with us.
I don't hate the people, i hate the goverment, but come on, who doesn't hate ol jock.
|
You're one to say things are stupid, aren't ya.
I don't support the war on nouns, does that make me a "Frenchie"? Hell, I have the same reasons as the French - wanting... wait. Let's clear something up. They didn't support the war in Iraq, I don't believe they said anything about nouns.... wanting to wait until some evidence [you know, those WMDs? Oh, a funny thing. If anyone here reads the Economist, I see the "Bush gives up on finding WMD" line was in as small a font size as possible] turned up.
And gosh, aren't we all still waiting?
I didn't go to Reagan's funeral. Did you?
I'm not fucking surprised they don't support you. All the shit they are getting from Americans dumb enough to belive the propaganda about the French people being Saddam collabirators... let's not go back to how they saved YOUR asses once, eh.
Cohoots with Saddam? You're so good at backing things up, where's that tidbit of evidence?
And by the logic in your last statement, that means a couple hundred other countries are terrorists. Ireland, Scotland, Zimbabwe (bad example), Afghanistan (though I heard they're in the Colaition of the Essentially Absolutely. Local warlord lend you some troops or something?), Peru, Guam, etc etc etfc.
And as for the remark earlier on about how you killed "100'000 TERRORISTS! TERRORISTS! SERIOUSLY, THEY POINTED GUNS AT US< THEY WERE EBIL ROFL DIE SCUM" or whateverthehellyousaid, no. That's the civilian count. What you probably HAVE done is turned about another 100'000 people INTO terrorists.
For a "war" that aims to crush terrorism...
You shure you succeeding? But hey, I forgot! You're cowmisfit, warmongering kid extraordinaire! You're going to enlist, then change how all this works so people won't get killed, Terrorism won't be a watchword, and ebil dictators everywhere will get a taste of Uncle Sam.
Oh wait. You won't.
| Deathgod |
Why? What makes your life more valuable than that of anyone else's?
|
Duh. He's American.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| America Makes "Gay Bomb" [message #133619] |
Sat, 22 January 2005 18:03 |
 |
warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (2 Stars) |
|
|
| cowmisfit |
| warranto |
It was meant to sound stupid. Sipmply because it IS true, yetpeople seem to be ignoring that fact when they bring across things like "You don't know how American's feel because of terrorist actions!" (or some variation thereof).
My point being there have been major terrorist acts around the world (perhaps nothing as dramatic as 9/11), yet no "war on terrorism" was declared by America. I don't intend for that statement to be regarded as an insult, rather the point in reference.
|
Such as the bombings in kenya ect, we gave AID and such, we have gave AID to the isrelies in there war on stopping palistien terrorist from killing there citizens. We always help when a major "terrorist" attack is commited, however it would only make sense that once they come to our soil, ecpecially in the way they did , its our responsibility to counter-attack.
Other nations that have been attacked COULD launch a war on terror if they wished, and we would back them 100% (even if it was france) they simpley choose not too and to let themselves contine to be under attack.
|
I definatly realize that, however the point I was getting at is sitting back and doing nothing actively until it affects you directly, then complaining about how other countries don't want to act, based on the same premise of it not happening to them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| America Makes "Gay Bomb" [message #133637] |
Sat, 22 January 2005 18:54 |
msgtpain
Messages: 663
Registered: March 2003
Location: Montana
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| =[DT |
=gbull=[L]=]Dont forget Stalin either, he used nukes on his own country.
|
I could be wrong, but didn't Stalin die in 1953, the same year the USSR began testing their first hydrogen bombs?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Feb 10 16:36:25 MST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01502 seconds
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
