| Viable terms for "seeding"? [message #398909] |
Fri, 21 August 2009 23:47  |
Crazyreb
Messages: 13
Registered: September 2007
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Is voting for the number 1 seed really the best way to determine seeding? If everyone was well informed, only 1 to 2 teams would have votes imo. But based on the general idea that every team wants to be ranked higher for the better seed, the teams with basically more "members" will get the most votes, and therefore have a better seeding over say one of the better teams. I mean it really doesnt matter for the top team(since they should win anyways), but imo this disrupts how this should be really seeded.
I would prefer more of an idea of electing a "board" of knowledgeable renegaders to put this together. I couldnt care less who is on it as long as they can identify most players and therefore seed the teams fairly and easily.
Anyways... No matter what, someone will always be unhappy with the seeding. This is just something I thought of.
Crazyreb sOaPeY MiPadre
[TSU] oblivian1: FUCK THIS UR SHOOTING THROUGH WALLS!
[21:01] <&tsuaow> 7[NR] 08CyBa: man thats a pro ass pub tech bitch
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Viable terms for "seeding"? [message #398944 is a reply to message #398913] |
Sat, 22 August 2009 05:12  |
 |
HaTe
Messages: 923
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| Quote: |
Server Host: Lower ranked seed in each match gets to host on their server (unless they choose not to)
|
You sort of want the lower seed if you want to host the game...that's why it was made like this. I also noticed that there is no wittlebolx in the voting, yet they are still on the roster in the announcement? I guess the fact that there will be a bye does change things then..
‘All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing’ - Edmund Burke
[Updated on: Sat, 22 August 2009 05:42] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: Viable terms for "seeding"? [message #399038 is a reply to message #398909] |
Sat, 22 August 2009 15:59 |
Crazyreb
Messages: 13
Registered: September 2007
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
host on their server? who cares tbh. The gametype is going to be the exact same. The only difference would pretty much be a euro team vs US team. Then ping comes into effect.
Crazyreb sOaPeY MiPadre
[TSU] oblivian1: FUCK THIS UR SHOOTING THROUGH WALLS!
[21:01] <&tsuaow> 7[NR] 08CyBa: man thats a pro ass pub tech bitch
|
|
|
|
| Re: Viable terms for "seeding"? [message #399075 is a reply to message #398913] |
Sat, 22 August 2009 22:13 |
 |
RadioactiveHell
Messages: 175
Registered: August 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Goztow wrote on Sat, 22 August 2009 02:35 |
Just ask Spoony, tbh...
|
^
But to elaborate, I agree that the current seeding system is essentially just what community has the most members. I dont think it really matters tho in the end, whatever the best team is should still win either way.
[Updated on: Sat, 22 August 2009 22:15] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
