Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » Censorship 2
Censorship 2 [message #151991] Thu, 28 April 2005 12:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Beanyhead is currently offline  Beanyhead
Messages: 549
Registered: February 2003
Location: Kentucky, USA
Karma: 0
Colonel

Sir Phoenixx

Oblivion165

it goes by popular vote, not education level.

Except for 6 elected presidents who didn't get the popular votes, 4 of which were elected by the electoral college, 2 were elected by the house of representatives.


Perhaps, but that has nothing to do with education level. It doesn't matter what your education level, you can have a job in politics; George W. Bush proves this. It's still voted by popular vote because YOU voted those officals in office who vote on the president. (At least the house representatives that vote).
Censorship 2 [message #151999] Thu, 28 April 2005 13:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
flyingfox is currently offline  flyingfox
Messages: 1612
Registered: February 2003
Location: scotland, uk
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Quote:

education level


hmm, where did I say anything about education level. have you ever ran a busy forum or game server yourself? if so, did you notice it's a lot different than being a player or member of that forum or server? you have people moaning at you all the time to kick and ban players from the game. on a forum, you probably receive a lot of PMs and complaints about how it is ran, as showcased by these recent topics about ACK and moderation. my point is I feel you shouldn't be qualified to say whether or not someone gets banned from the FORUM unless you have ran a forum yourself, considered all the reasons, who you are banning, why, does the offense merit a ban, most of these people have said more or less "he is annoying, ban" and have not really thought about anything except that they don't like his posts. I'd personally like to ban a select few people because their posts annoy me....do I? and has he broken any rules, NO! so these people should STFU and let the administration do their job.
Censorship 2 [message #152000] Thu, 28 April 2005 13:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oblivion165 is currently offline  Oblivion165
Messages: 3468
Registered: June 2003
Location: Hendersonville, North Car...
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Sir Phoenixx

Oblivion165

it goes by popular vote, not education level.

Except for 6 elected presidents who didn't get the popular votes, 4 of which were elected by the electoral college, 2 were elected by the house of representatives.



I am well aware of the electorial college, at the end of the day it goes by voting.


WOL: Ob165ion Skype: Oblivion165 Yahoo Instant Messenger: CaptainJohn165
Censorship 2 [message #152002] Thu, 28 April 2005 13:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Oblivion165 is currently offline  Oblivion165
Messages: 3468
Registered: June 2003
Location: Hendersonville, North Car...
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
flyingfox

Quote:

education level


hmm, where did I say anything about education level. have you ever ran a busy forum or game server yourself? if so, did you notice it's a lot different than being a player or member of that forum or server? you have people moaning at you all the time to kick and ban players from the game. on a forum, you probably receive a lot of PMs and complaints about how it is ran, as showcased by these recent topics about ACK and moderation. my point is I feel you shouldn't be qualified to say whether or not someone gets banned from the FORUM unless you have ran a forum yourself, considered all the reasons, who you are banning, why, does the offense merit a ban, most of these people have said more or less "he is annoying, ban" and have not really thought about anything except that they don't like his posts. I'd personally like to ban a select few people because their posts annoy me....do I? and has he broken any rules, NO! so these people should STFU and let the administration do their job.


There are practiacally no rules on these forum. Read them yourself, just stuff about signature size limits. The fact is that it was voted on in majority and that there are at least three active threads about his banning.


WOL: Ob165ion Skype: Oblivion165 Yahoo Instant Messenger: CaptainJohn165
Censorship 2 [message #152024] Thu, 28 April 2005 15:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
I'd just like to mention that the US voting system is entirely different than this issue.

Well thankfully, those votes are restored. Unfortunately, that doesn't mean that anyone will be forced to ban ACK, but I think it speaks for itself that most of the people who voted want something done. ANY action at this point is much better than no action.

Oh and as for the Hot Topics forum - That forum is meant to go largely unmoderated, but if there is spam and 3 letter posts, etc, then that should be moderated. Off topic posts should be removed too along with ACK's attempts to derail threads. I'd welcome that sort of moderation because it keeps some order around here.


http://www.baclan.org/albums/album05/dasmodell.jpg
Quote:


Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window

Censorship 2 [message #152036] Thu, 28 April 2005 19:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jecht is currently offline  Jecht
Messages: 3156
Registered: September 2004
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
I just think ACKs attempts to derail topics should be moderated, after that who cares.

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9146/hartyn4.png
Censorship 2 [message #152043] Thu, 28 April 2005 20:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
http://www.renforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=14726
I'm down with that.


http://www.baclan.org/albums/album05/dasmodell.jpg
Quote:


Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window

Censorship 2 [message #152059] Thu, 28 April 2005 23:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Crimson is currently offline  Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR
Beanyhead

Perhaps, but that has nothing to do with education level. It doesn't matter what your education level, you can have a job in politics; George W. Bush proves this. It's still voted by popular vote because YOU voted those officals in office who vote on the president. (At least the house representatives that vote).


Yeah, a Bachelors Degree from Yale University and an MBA(M is for Masters) from Harvard Business School just fall off the back of a truck these days. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:


I'm the bawss.
Censorship 2 [message #152082] Fri, 29 April 2005 05:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Chronojam is currently offline  Chronojam
Messages: 688
Registered: March 2003
Karma: 0
Colonel
No, not anymore due to internal auditing and being criticized for grade inflation and passing too many students who shouldn't have passed. But back in the day... Laughing
Censorship 2 [message #152114] Fri, 29 April 2005 11:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Aircraftkiller is currently offline  Aircraftkiller
Messages: 8213
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
hahaha... You all turned on each other like rabid wolves and now you're left with a worse place than before because you lack the self-control to do anything about it.
Censorship 2 [message #152151] Fri, 29 April 2005 16:38 Go to previous message
msgtpain is currently offline  msgtpain
Messages: 663
Registered: March 2003
Location: Montana
Karma: 0
Colonel
Worse place than before? When all the stupid and annoying posts you make are deleted, it can only be better than before. If other stupid and annoying posts are deleted at the same time, all the better.
Previous Topic: Interesting Weapon
Next Topic: ROFL@THIS
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Jul 23 18:43:38 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00784 seconds