Let's hold our own unofficial election! [message #87275] |
Thu, 13 May 2004 16:47 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
hydra1945 | Oh, and that "I'll vote for this guy because I don't like that guy" philosophy may be the worst ever. That's like saying you don't like Idi Amin so you're going to vote for Josef Stalin.
|
Well, yeah, unless you give thought to the person you would choose over someone else. [In this case Bush].
Sorry, I can't give any in-depth research as to why, big project to work on for the next month or so, after that I can start talkin again.
Crimson: That second link you showed in your one post where the guy says how Kerry bombed all of his interviews doesn't make all that much sense. Did you actually see his interviews?
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
Let's hold our own unofficial election! [message #87281] |
Thu, 13 May 2004 16:56 |
|
Crimson
Messages: 7429 Registered: February 2003 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars) ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
I'm not concerned with the entire article, just the part where he admits we may still find WMD.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
Re: Let's hold our own unofficial election! [message #87290] |
Thu, 13 May 2004 17:06 |
setstyle
Messages: 101 Registered: July 2003
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
hydra1945 |
setstyle | 2. Ralph Nader is not running as a Green Party candidate.
|
I forget, is he running as an independant this year?
|
Yeah he is, but he seems to be doing quite well so far.
|
|
|
Let's hold our own unofficial election! [message #87293] |
Thu, 13 May 2004 17:09 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
hydra, ggetting back to what you were saying about voting for the wrong person because of silly reasons, here's something you should look at:
Crimson: Well, of course we may find WMDs. We may find anything. I may find WMDs in my fridge when I go up to grab a snack. Highly unlikely, but still technically possible. Besides, the Bush administration could always plant WMDs.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
Let's hold our own unofficial election! [message #87318] |
Thu, 13 May 2004 18:15 |
|
Crimson
Messages: 7429 Registered: February 2003 Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars) ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
You know damn well that Kerry wouldn't have said "we may yet find [WMD]" if the possibility were as unlikely as you finding them in your fridge.
"Kerry knows what everyone with a memory knows: which is that Saddam had WMD and the world agreed he had them. Perhaps they were destroyed, perhaps hidden, perhaps trucked to Syria, but he had them. Thank you, Mr. Kerry, for your only contribution to the public's understanding of the war to date."
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
Let's hold our own unofficial election! [message #87540] |
Fri, 14 May 2004 14:44 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Crimson, even if there is a possibility, it would look bad to Kerry if he said we won't find WMDs in Iraq and then we found even a zip-loc bag of anything that could possibly be considered a WMD, regardless of whether or not it comes out that the WMD bag was a plant. Also, did that quote come straight from Lim-Butthead?
Do you read the paper on Saturday by any chance, Crimson?
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let's hold our own unofficial election! [message #89812] |
Mon, 24 May 2004 19:53 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Like which policies?
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
Let's hold our own unofficial election! [message #89848] |
Tue, 25 May 2004 05:05 |
KIRBY098
Messages: 1546 Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
SuperFlyingEngi | Like which policies?
|
Making Americans dependent on the central Government for handouts while jacking our taxes to pay for it, WELFARE, and inserting cigars into interns while disgracing the oval office in the process then lying to entire world about it on camera.
Deleted
|
|
|
Let's hold our own unofficial election! [message #90675] |
Fri, 28 May 2004 20:49 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Damn, why the hell does everyone insist that Clinton's personal life is so closely related to how he operates the country? What the hell was he suposed to say when Congress asked him whether he was havin an affair or not? That's such a bastard question. Plus, it's not a policy.
Read this site about how conservatives try to disort the media:
http://mediamatters.org/
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
Let's hold our own unofficial election! [message #90963] |
Sat, 29 May 2004 20:10 |
|
Hydra
Messages: 827 Registered: September 2003 Location: Atlanta, GA
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
SuperFlyingEngi | What the hell was he suposed to say when Congress asked him whether he was havin an affair or not?
|
When you're under oath, he is supposed to say the truth.
He was accused of sexually harassing Paula Jones, and Monica Lewinsky signed an affidavit for Paula Jones's lawyer that says she did not have an affair with Bill Clinton. You can't lie on an affidavit.
Get it through your head that he was not impeached for getting his dick sucked but for lying under oath. That's called perjury, which is categorized as a F-E-L-O-N-Y. Do you know what else is categorized as a F-E-L-O-N-Y for which Bill Clinton was under investigation? Obstruction of justice. Bill Clinton was impeached for committing TWO FUCKING F-E-L-O-N-I-E-S.
Quote: | That's such a bastard question. Plus, it's not a policy.
|
No, it's a legitimate question when it's written on a fucking affidavit that he didn't have an affair with her.
:rolleyes:
Does this even warrant a response?
Walter Keith Koester: September 22, 1962 - March 15, 2005
God be with you, Uncle Wally.
(<---New(ish) Prayer Group Forums)
(<---Archived Prayer Group Forums)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let's hold our own unofficial election! [message #91611] |
Tue, 01 June 2004 12:39 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Aright, I'll get back to the other stuff in a week or so after school gets out and I have time to do things, but first, hydra:
It's not just that some people think it's silly to write books full of President Bush mispronouncing things. The case may be that he is dyslexic. During the 9/11 attack, when Bush was at the school reading books to children, and was informed that the towers were being hit by planes, he just sits there reading the book for another 7 minutes. Behavioral psychologists look at this [which is on tape and will be in Fahrenheit 9/11, I believe] and say, "Oh my god, this is what we teach dyslexic children to do when they are reading." Another instance is when he was asked by some reporters what his first book was, and he said some random kid title like "Run dog run" or something, and ok. But as we look back, "Run dog run" [or whatever the hell it was called] was first published when he was 19.
And on flip-flopping issues: Like what? Please name some so I can get back to those.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|