Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » RSF Raptor
Re: RSF Raptor [message #429667 is a reply to message #429665] Sat, 29 May 2010 06:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Goztow is currently offline  Goztow
Messages: 9735
Registered: March 2005
Location: Belgium
Karma: 13
General (5 Stars)
Goztoe
DeathLink6.0 wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 14:47

EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 07:25


You just proved my point, they are very handy features to have. The downside of them are (I think) that it makes defending too easy (presuming everyone has them). It would be impossible to sneak in somewhere. Hell you wouldn't even need to lay down 5 mines per entrace anymore, as you'll directly notices when someons attempts to move in.

As answer I just quote myself.
Quote:

Agreed but only in relation to the minecounter feature. Otherwise no.


Quote:

Anyone ever wondered why you don't get EVA messages for every building that's under attack?

Yea and my answer is: EVA would spam messages for every little bullet and that would be annoying for players to hear every half second such a message. This is the one and only reason and not because covering sneaking techis.

I'm totally NOT convinced that BB would change the gameplay in a negative way.

I strongly disagree. If this were the case, then they'd have done an EVA message for each building and have a counter per building. Now there's only one EVA message per x time over ALL buildings.

Also BB is a much greater advantage than mine count because it warns you for immediate and urgent danger whereas the mine counter only tells you "there may be danger inside your base within > 30 seconds".


You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
Re: RSF Raptor [message #429673 is a reply to message #429667] Sat, 29 May 2010 09:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
DL60 is currently offline  DL60
Messages: 283
Registered: May 2006
Karma: 0
Recruit
Goztow wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 08:02


I strongly disagree. If this were the case, then they'd have done an EVA message for each building and have a counter per building. Now there's only one EVA message per x time over ALL buildings.


Maybe maybe not... with a counter for every building you would still have the problem with multiple short messages after each other.

Goztow wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 08:02


Also BB is a much greater advantage than mine count because it warns you for immediate and urgent danger whereas the mine counter only tells you "there may be danger inside your base within > 30 seconds".


Don't forget I'm talking about the feature in general (if every would have it).

Okay maybe it has a negative effect if add bb permanently or not. I'm not sure. It is still nothing is proven for me. I think we have a too different opinions and views about this.

Independent from this. What about my two compromises?

[Updated on: Sat, 29 May 2010 09:34]

Report message to a moderator

Re: RSF Raptor [message #429685 is a reply to message #429673] Sat, 29 May 2010 10:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Starbuzzz
Messages: 1637
Registered: June 2008
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
You only need to play with a BB for 1 whole day on all the WW stock maps to see how it drastically changes gameplay in your favour.

Once on Under, I was SBH with grenade launcher from spawn. I went deep into the GDI tunnels and shot the Barr with my laser rifle prompting EVA to announce that it was under attack. I quickly switched to grenade launcher and grenaded the PP and took almost more than half its health away. A GDI player with BB will notice which buildings really needs repairs. Its this nice element of surprise that BB users don't seem to mind losing. The examples go on and on...

I don't know why TT has to compromise on this issue while the individual power really belongs to the server communities. It really is imho upto the communities to have a internal vote or a rule change or clarification to makeway for BB's to be allowed on their server.

Asking TT for a compromise is like asking the central government to needlessly interefere and help out while the individual states/districts already have the ability to resolve the matter themselves.


http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/8746/buzzsigfinal.jpg
Re: RSF Raptor [message #429687 is a reply to message #429685] Sat, 29 May 2010 11:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Goztow is currently offline  Goztow
Messages: 9735
Registered: March 2005
Location: Belgium
Karma: 13
General (5 Stars)
Goztoe
Starbuzzz wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 19:54

You only need to play with a BB for 1 whole day on all the WW stock maps to see how it drastically changes gameplay in your favour.

Once on Under, I was SBH with grenade launcher from spawn. I went deep into the GDI tunnels and shot the Barr with my laser rifle prompting EVA to announce that it was under attack. I quickly switched to grenade launcher and grenaded the PP and took almost more than half its health away. A GDI player with BB will notice which buildings really needs repairs. Its this nice element of surprise that BB users don't seem to mind losing. The examples go on and on...

I don't know why TT has to compromise on this issue while the individual power really belongs to the server communities. It really is imho upto the communities to have a internal vote or a rule change or clarification to makeway for BB's to be allowed on their server.

Asking TT for a compromise is like asking the central government to needlessly interefere and help out while the individual states/districts already have the ability to resolve the matter themselves.

Thank God someone read my posts!


You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
Re: RSF Raptor [message #429688 is a reply to message #429685] Sat, 29 May 2010 11:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
DL60 is currently offline  DL60
Messages: 283
Registered: May 2006
Karma: 0
Recruit
Starbuzzz wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 12:54


Asking TT for a compromise is like asking the central government to needlessly interefere and help out while the individual states/districts already have the ability to resolve the matter themselves.

I'm not asking TT to do anything. Where did you read that?
I'm just discussing and doing mind experiments.

Anyway it's the fault of the building bars if people don't use existing feature. My compromises would change nothing except you can run/walk/shoot while pressing the existing building bar button.

Quote:

Thank God someone read my posts!

They were full of statements and contained not one example situation to underline them. Starbuzzz finally made that.

[Updated on: Sat, 29 May 2010 11:10]

Report message to a moderator

Re: RSF Raptor [message #429691 is a reply to message #429252] Sat, 29 May 2010 11:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Tiesto is currently offline  Tiesto
Messages: 600
Registered: June 2006
Karma: 0
Colonel
So what? Its up to the serverowners if they allow BB or not?

You do realise then, that 99% of the servers will allow it, so the ridiculous amount of angriness about BB is rather futile.


Exodus Senior Moderator
For a commwar against Exodus, pm me.
Re: RSF Raptor [message #429696 is a reply to message #429691] Sat, 29 May 2010 11:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Clark Kent is currently offline  Clark Kent
Messages: 274
Registered: January 2010
Location: Smallville, Kansas
Karma: 0
Recruit
Tiesto wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 13:33

So what? Its up to the serverowners if they allow BB or not?

You do realise then, that 99% of the servers will allow it, so the ridiculous amount of angriness about BB is rather futile.

qft Big Ups
Re: RSF Raptor [message #429697 is a reply to message #429688] Sat, 29 May 2010 11:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Goztow is currently offline  Goztow
Messages: 9735
Registered: March 2005
Location: Belgium
Karma: 13
General (5 Stars)
Goztoe
DeathLink6.0 wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 20:03



Quote:

Thank God someone read my posts!

They were full of statements and contained not one example situation to underline them. Starbuzzz finally made that.

Yet another proof you didn't read my posts.


You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
Re: RSF Raptor [message #429698 is a reply to message #429697] Sat, 29 May 2010 12:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
DL60 is currently offline  DL60
Messages: 283
Registered: May 2006
Karma: 0
Recruit
Quote:

Yet another proof you didn't read my posts.

I strongly disagree.

Maybe I understand something different than you when I swrote "example"? Ever thought of that? According to my definition there are no examples or situations which underline your statements.

Btw do you want to continue making baseless suppositions concerning my person? Or do you even want to start insulting me? I'm open for everything today - I already know enough, so there is no need but I'm also happy about every additional piece I can get. It's up to you Gozy Wink

(@Others: Don't laugh about this here - this is scientific nerdrage on another level you would never think of! Just let me do - I'm just curious)


[Updated on: Sat, 29 May 2010 12:11]

Report message to a moderator

Re: RSF Raptor [message #429699 is a reply to message #429507] Sat, 29 May 2010 12:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Goztow is currently offline  Goztow
Messages: 9735
Registered: March 2005
Location: Belgium
Karma: 13
General (5 Stars)
Goztoe
Starbuzzz wrote on Thu, 27 May 2010 04:30

Goztow wrote on Wed, 26 May 2010 01:57

When 5 arties are pounding your base while you are grouping up meds to destroy them, then a building can be dead within less than 20 seconds.

The difference between realtime info and pressing the key is a huge gap. I'd like to see someone fraps how he plays when he's constantly pressing the 'k' button long enough to watch the health of all buildings. If you want the same level of information as BB, then your gameplay will become totally wrecked because you need to keep doing it all the way throughout the game.


This is the entire argument against buildings bars in a nutshell. If someone cannot understand this as well-decribed by Goztow, then they obviously are suffering from TAP syndrome.

I guess you missed this when you weren't reading my posts then.


You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
Re: RSF Raptor [message #429701 is a reply to message #429699] Sat, 29 May 2010 12:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
DL60 is currently offline  DL60
Messages: 283
Registered: May 2006
Karma: 0
Recruit
Hey you are right. I haven't read that. I only read the lower part of page 4 (everything after my post) and page 5 of this topic. Everything concerning our discussion. How hell should I know that you posted an example long before? I don't have time to follow everything. Give me a hint or a link next time whenever I should ask for something again!

And what are we doing now with the existing building bars? Who's using the existing BBs constantly and often? If not for what are they else useful for? I never really used them in clanwars/public games. Only once in two dozen games just to check if they still appear if I press K. Why are they there?

Edit: Again what's now with my ideas/compromises concerning this?

[Updated on: Sat, 29 May 2010 12:49]

Report message to a moderator

Re: RSF Raptor [message #429704 is a reply to message #429691] Sat, 29 May 2010 13:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
EvilWhiteDragon is currently offline  EvilWhiteDragon
Messages: 3751
Registered: October 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)

Tiesto wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 20:33

So what? Its up to the serverowners if they allow BB or not?

You do realise then, that 99% of the servers will allow it, so the ridiculous amount of angriness about BB is rather futile.

Certainly not 99%. There are currently about 88 servers. I can assure you that at least one will have BB disabled. That would make it max 98,87% of the servers. Since BlackIntel technically runs 3 servers, you'd already be down to about 96%.

Now stop abusing statistics if you can't back them up, retard.


http://www.blackintel.org/usr/evilwhitedragon/pointfix.gif
BlackIntel admin/founder/PR dude (not a coder)
Please visit http://www.blackintel.org/

V, V for Vendetta

People should not be afraid of their governments.
Governments should be afraid of their people.
Re: RSF Raptor [message #429708 is a reply to message #429704] Sat, 29 May 2010 14:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Tiesto is currently offline  Tiesto
Messages: 600
Registered: June 2006
Karma: 0
Colonel
EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 21:23

Tiesto wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 20:33

So what? Its up to the serverowners if they allow BB or not?

You do realise then, that 99% of the servers will allow it, so the ridiculous amount of angriness about BB is rather futile.

Certainly not 99%. There are currently about 88 servers. I can assure you that at least one will have BB disabled. That would make it max 98,87% of the servers. Since BlackIntel technically runs 3 servers, you'd already be down to about 96%.

Now stop abusing statistics if you can't back them up, retard.

oh my god! Mr angry!

Okay, a majority of the servers will allow it then, would that satisfy you and your high horse?



Exodus Senior Moderator
For a commwar against Exodus, pm me.
Re: RSF Raptor [message #429709 is a reply to message #429704] Sat, 29 May 2010 14:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cAmpa is currently offline  cAmpa
Messages: 597
Registered: March 2006
Karma: 0
Colonel
EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 22:23

Tiesto wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 20:33

So what? Its up to the serverowners if they allow BB or not?

You do realise then, that 99% of the servers will allow it, so the ridiculous amount of angriness about BB is rather futile.

Certainly not 99%. There are currently about 88 servers. I can assure you that at least one will have BB disabled. That would make it max 98,87% of the servers. Since BlackIntel technically runs 3 servers, you'd already be down to about 96%.

Now stop abusing statistics if you can't back them up, retard.


I would disable it, too. Rocked Over


Bückstabü!
Re: RSF Raptor [message #429717 is a reply to message #429685] Sat, 29 May 2010 15:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
sadukar09 is currently offline  sadukar09
Messages: 2812
Registered: May 2007
Location: Ottawa,Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Starbuzzz wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 12:54

You only need to play with a BB for 1 whole day on all the WW stock maps to see how it drastically changes gameplay in your favour.

Once on Under, I was SBH with grenade launcher from spawn. I went deep into the GDI tunnels and shot the Barr with my laser rifle prompting EVA to announce that it was under attack. I quickly switched to grenade launcher and grenaded the PP and took almost more than half its health away. A GDI player with BB will notice which buildings really needs repairs. Its this nice element of surprise that BB users don't seem to mind losing. The examples go on and on...

You can rapidly press J or K to get the same effect. A guy with building bars only has the advantage of slightly faster updates, even then it's not much as you make it out to be.


Quote:

[19:16:48] <APBBR> @ryan3k: THE ENFIELD DEFIES THE LAWS OF PHYSICS BECAUSE THE BULLETS INSTANTLY HIT THEIR TARGETS LOL
[19:16:52] <APBBR> @ryan3k: CHRONO TECHNOLOGY IN TEH BULLETS


Quote:

[22:48]<APBBR> @V0LK0V: AOL COMING UR WAI K
[22:48] <APBBR> Host: Quitting due to Westwood Online connection loss.

Re: RSF Raptor [message #429724 is a reply to message #429708] Sat, 29 May 2010 17:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
EvilWhiteDragon is currently offline  EvilWhiteDragon
Messages: 3751
Registered: October 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)

Tiesto wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 23:24

EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 21:23

Tiesto wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 20:33

So what? Its up to the serverowners if they allow BB or not?

You do realise then, that 99% of the servers will allow it, so the ridiculous amount of angriness about BB is rather futile.

Certainly not 99%. There are currently about 88 servers. I can assure you that at least one will have BB disabled. That would make it max 98,87% of the servers. Since BlackIntel technically runs 3 servers, you'd already be down to about 96%.

Now stop abusing statistics if you can't back them up, retard.

oh my god! Mr angry!

Okay, a majority of the servers will allow it then, would that satisfy you and your high horse?



Not until you show me that majority. My guess is that it'll be pretty 50/50 when you'll look at all servers. But I haven't checked this.

And I'm being Mr.Angry because I hate it when someone claims sonething which may very well be different. The majority could be true, but you're stating it as if it where a fact, that's plain wrong.


http://www.blackintel.org/usr/evilwhitedragon/pointfix.gif
BlackIntel admin/founder/PR dude (not a coder)
Please visit http://www.blackintel.org/

V, V for Vendetta

People should not be afraid of their governments.
Governments should be afraid of their people.
Re: RSF Raptor [message #429728 is a reply to message #429724] Sat, 29 May 2010 18:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Clark Kent is currently offline  Clark Kent
Messages: 274
Registered: January 2010
Location: Smallville, Kansas
Karma: 0
Recruit
EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 19:32

Tiesto wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 23:24

EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 21:23

Tiesto wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 20:33

So what? Its up to the serverowners if they allow BB or not?

You do realise then, that 99% of the servers will allow it, so the ridiculous amount of angriness about BB is rather futile.

Certainly not 99%. There are currently about 88 servers. I can assure you that at least one will have BB disabled. That would make it max 98,87% of the servers. Since BlackIntel technically runs 3 servers, you'd already be down to about 96%.

Now stop abusing statistics if you can't back them up, retard.

oh my god! Mr angry!

Okay, a majority of the servers will allow it then, would that satisfy you and your high horse?



Not until you show me that majority. My guess is that it'll be pretty 50/50 when you'll look at all servers. But I haven't checked this.

And I'm being Mr.Angry because I hate it when someone claims sonething which may very well be different. The majority could be true, but you're stating it as if it where a fact, that's plain wrong.

Should have said "active" servers.
Re: RSF Raptor [message #429743 is a reply to message #429252] Sat, 29 May 2010 23:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Goztow is currently offline  Goztow
Messages: 9735
Registered: March 2005
Location: Belgium
Karma: 13
General (5 Stars)
Goztoe
TK2 would disable it...

I'm still waiting for someone to fraps how he plays while pressing k every 3 seconds during battle, as I requested about 20 posts ago.


You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
Re: RSF Raptor [message #429744 is a reply to message #429743] Sun, 30 May 2010 00:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
DL60 is currently offline  DL60
Messages: 283
Registered: May 2006
Karma: 0
Recruit
Goztow wrote on Sun, 30 May 2010 01:41

TK2 would disable it...

I'm still waiting for someone to fraps how he plays while pressing k every 3 seconds during battle, as I requested about 20 posts ago.

This proofs only that this is useless feature atm. Bring it to use and change the gameplay!
Re: RSF Raptor [message #429745 is a reply to message #429728] Sun, 30 May 2010 00:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
EvilWhiteDragon is currently offline  EvilWhiteDragon
Messages: 3751
Registered: October 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)

Clark Kent wrote on Sun, 30 May 2010 03:06

EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 19:32

Tiesto wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 23:24

EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 21:23

Tiesto wrote on Sat, 29 May 2010 20:33

So what? Its up to the serverowners if they allow BB or not?

You do realise then, that 99% of the servers will allow it, so the ridiculous amount of angriness about BB is rather futile.

Certainly not 99%. There are currently about 88 servers. I can assure you that at least one will have BB disabled. That would make it max 98,87% of the servers. Since BlackIntel technically runs 3 servers, you'd already be down to about 96%.

Now stop abusing statistics if you can't back them up, retard.

oh my god! Mr angry!

Okay, a majority of the servers will allow it then, would that satisfy you and your high horse?



Not until you show me that majority. My guess is that it'll be pretty 50/50 when you'll look at all servers. But I haven't checked this.

And I'm being Mr.Angry because I hate it when someone claims sonething which may very well be different. The majority could be true, but you're stating it as if it where a fact, that's plain wrong.

Should have said "active" servers.

BlackIntel is active. Not as active as it has been in the past, but hey, what server doesn't suffer?


http://www.blackintel.org/usr/evilwhitedragon/pointfix.gif
BlackIntel admin/founder/PR dude (not a coder)
Please visit http://www.blackintel.org/

V, V for Vendetta

People should not be afraid of their governments.
Governments should be afraid of their people.
Re: RSF Raptor [message #429747 is a reply to message #429743] Sun, 30 May 2010 02:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Herr Surth is currently offline  Herr Surth
Messages: 1684
Registered: July 2007
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Goztow wrote on Sun, 30 May 2010 01:41

TK2 would disable it...

I'm still waiting for someone to fraps how he plays while pressing k every 3 seconds during battle, as I requested about 20 posts ago.

you can play pressing k about 2 to 3 times a second, its not hard to do.
Re: RSF Raptor [message #429749 is a reply to message #429252] Sun, 30 May 2010 02:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
liquidv2 is currently offline  liquidv2
Messages: 3407
Registered: February 2007
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
BUILDING BARS NYEAHHHHH
active servers
there are a handful of servers that handle probably 90% or more of renegade's ingame population
worry about those servers


liquidv2
Re: RSF Raptor [message #429773 is a reply to message #429749] Sun, 30 May 2010 11:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
HaTe is currently offline  HaTe
Messages: 923
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
Colonel
You're posts are wrong though Goztow....your opinions are flawed...

Basically, c4 feature warns you the same way that building bars does - the only difference is that with buildings bars you know where to defend, and with mine count you may have to search.

If you are an experienced Renegade players, then you most likely already press 'k' every now and then to check for buildings damaged. I used building bars for a while, and seriously, they don't help that much. Basically you have to look to the side of your screen rather then pressing a button to check it. "WOW, WHAT A CHEAT!" When mine count is basically saving you the trouble of typing something (!c4) out, or pressing a button (cp2). Yet somehow you are so against building bars - as to temp ban people for links to sites that include them - yet you allow the release of the c4 feature here. It's being a hypocrite really...the reason at first was because the building bars didn't include something that the c4 feature did...but now it does. Why still go against something that you have been -in a way- for the entire time..?


http://i162.photobucket.com/albums/t263/psuHaTe32_2007/HaTe3.jpg
‘All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing’ - Edmund Burke
Re: RSF Raptor [message #429776 is a reply to message #429252] Sun, 30 May 2010 11:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Goztow is currently offline  Goztow
Messages: 9735
Registered: March 2005
Location: Belgium
Karma: 13
General (5 Stars)
Goztoe
Opinions are opinions are opinions. My opinion can be flawed in your opinion and right in someone else's opinion. It's hard to draw a line of what is acceptable and what isn't, and this line will be different for everyone. However, I drawed the line of what's acceptable on renforums very clearly wrt building bars on renforums and the temp banned user choose to volontary ignore it.

You can find me in The KOSs2 (TK2) discord while I'm playing. Feel free to come and say hi! TK2 discord
Re: RSF Raptor [message #429777 is a reply to message #429776] Sun, 30 May 2010 11:46 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
HaTe is currently offline  HaTe
Messages: 923
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 0
Colonel
I understand that, which is why i'm not against the ban - I'm personally against the rule. Can you tell me how your opinion honestly makes sense - with the whole c4 feature vs building bars? Besides what you have already said, because honestly, i don't much understand the logic in what you have said so far, sorry.

http://i162.photobucket.com/albums/t263/psuHaTe32_2007/HaTe3.jpg
‘All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing’ - Edmund Burke
Previous Topic: Hardcore Mix - May 2010
Next Topic: CNCTube - Video Sharing Site
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Sep 22 11:42:39 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01511 seconds