Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums: General Discussion » Teamwork still exists on non-clan games !?!

Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » Teamwork still exists on non-clan games !?!

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Teamwork still exists on non-clan games !?! [message #5492]

Tue, 11 March 2003 13:32

eggmac
Messages: 51
Registered: February 2003

Karma:

Recruit

yeah, it's nice teamwork of course, but this happens all the time (at least on GSA 24-player-servers). Now if the enemy team was also well organized, it could have been a funny game (4 hotties repairing while 4 meds keep bashing on the stanks..)

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Teamwork still exists on non-clan games !?! By: Vegita246 on Tue, 11 March 2003 13:15
		Teamwork still exists on non-clan games !?! By: eggmac on Tue, 11 March 2003 13:17
		Teamwork still exists on non-clan games !?! By: Vegita246 on Tue, 11 March 2003 13:20
		Teamwork still exists on non-clan games !?! By: eggmac on Tue, 11 March 2003 13:32
		Teamwork still exists on non-clan games !?! By: laeubi on Tue, 11 March 2003 13:37
		Teamwork still exists on non-clan games !?! By: Vegita246 on Tue, 11 March 2003 13:39
		Teamwork still exists on non-clan games !?! By: Blazer on Tue, 11 March 2003 15:10
		Teamwork still exists on non-clan games !?! By: Vegita246 on Tue, 11 March 2003 15:14
		Teamwork still exists on non-clan games !?! By: PiMuRho on Tue, 11 March 2003 15:48
		Teamwork still exists on non-clan games !?! By: Ren Sizzlefab on Tue, 11 March 2003 16:00
		Teamwork still exists on non-clan games !?! By: tHz2 on Tue, 11 March 2003 16:36
		Teamwork still exists on non-clan games !?! By: Griever92 on Tue, 11 March 2003 16:47
		Teamwork still exists on non-clan games !?! By: [sg]the0ne on Tue, 11 March 2003 17:01

Previous Topic:	1-800-big-boom
Next Topic:	I hate Japanamation.

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Sep 28 20:43:58 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00943 seconds