| Re: Help support DCOM Productions [message #472215 is a reply to message #472127] |
Wed, 25 July 2012 03:27   |
 |
Dave Anderson
Messages: 1953
Registered: December 2004
Location: United States
Karma:
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
The real-world cost to develop it is much more, but that's neither here nor there.
I'm not very great at advertising and marketing, so I am making revisions as to the "why" the next few days (and I updated it after your opinion as well), maybe even an updated video. The main why's are:
1) Superior user experience
2) First 'modern' bug tracker on the Windows Desktop and not the web in a long time
3) Specifically designed for CLR application development (so the entire feature set is geared towards managed languages)
4) Automated bug tracking (something as far as I know no bug tracker on earth has yet)
5) Affordable, and doesn't force you to use specific version control systems.
(I put the full list on the page at the top)
Also, it will work just fine for C++ and WinForms, since you are running under the CLR on .NET (C++/CLI). The main difference is that the actual fields are targeted specifically towards CLR languages. I know that native C++ has Exceptions, but I'm not sure how similar they are to CLR Exceptions, and I know for sure that the debugger services are quite different from the ones for the managed languages.
David Anderson
Founder, Software Consultant
DCOM Productions
Microsoft Partner (MSP)
[Updated on: Wed, 25 July 2012 04:03] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
