Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums: General Discussion » Lady Gaga

Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » Lady Gaga - Bad Romance

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance [message #427839 is a reply to message #427787]

Sun, 09 May 2010 05:21

GEORGE ZIMMER
Messages: 2605
Registered: March 2006

Karma:

General (2 Stars)

I don't really see why it's such a big deal. She's a modern pop star, it's not like those haven't existed. She's kinda like the new MJ, I guess.

Toggle Spoiler

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: _SSnipe_ on Sat, 08 May 2010 13:16
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: DRNG on Sat, 08 May 2010 14:53
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: Clark Kent on Sat, 08 May 2010 20:29
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: _SSnipe_ on Sat, 08 May 2010 21:46
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: Di3HardNL on Sun, 09 May 2010 03:15
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: snpr1101 on Sun, 09 May 2010 03:32
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: Di3HardNL on Sun, 09 May 2010 08:44
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: crazfulla on Tue, 11 May 2010 02:15
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: Herr Surth on Sun, 09 May 2010 03:28
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: GEORGE ZIMMER on Sun, 09 May 2010 05:21
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: DRNG on Sun, 09 May 2010 06:26
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: Tiesto on Tue, 11 May 2010 07:13
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: GEORGE ZIMMER on Tue, 11 May 2010 07:27
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: DRNG on Tue, 11 May 2010 08:26
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: Kimb on Tue, 11 May 2010 08:36
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: Clark Kent on Tue, 11 May 2010 09:15
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: Kimb on Wed, 12 May 2010 04:34
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: nikki6ixx on Tue, 11 May 2010 21:59
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: zeratul on Wed, 12 May 2010 14:59
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: Ryan3k on Wed, 12 May 2010 18:29
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: GEORGE ZIMMER on Wed, 12 May 2010 23:49
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: snpr1101 on Thu, 13 May 2010 01:21
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: Kimb on Thu, 13 May 2010 09:59
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: GEORGE ZIMMER on Thu, 13 May 2010 11:59
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: Kimb on Thu, 13 May 2010 12:12
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: snpr1101 on Thu, 13 May 2010 21:10
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: DRNG on Thu, 13 May 2010 04:45
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: _SSnipe_ on Wed, 12 May 2010 14:18
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: Clark Kent on Thu, 13 May 2010 10:12
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: Kimb on Thu, 13 May 2010 10:32
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: nikki6ixx on Thu, 13 May 2010 12:09
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: GEORGE ZIMMER on Thu, 13 May 2010 12:13
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: GEORGE ZIMMER on Thu, 13 May 2010 12:13
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: Kimb on Thu, 13 May 2010 12:14
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: DRNG on Thu, 13 May 2010 14:14
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: Kimb on Thu, 13 May 2010 14:18
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: Kimb on Thu, 13 May 2010 12:13
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: slosha on Thu, 13 May 2010 23:29
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: DRNG on Fri, 14 May 2010 08:24
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: Kimb on Fri, 14 May 2010 08:29
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: Clark Kent on Fri, 14 May 2010 14:10
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: snpr1101 on Fri, 14 May 2010 14:31
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: zeratul on Tue, 25 May 2010 15:13
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: _SSnipe_ on Mon, 24 May 2010 19:57
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: slosha on Mon, 24 May 2010 21:05
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: _SSnipe_ on Tue, 25 May 2010 15:04
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: Tiesto on Wed, 09 June 2010 13:05
		Re: Lady Gaga - Bad Romance By: Kimb on Wed, 09 June 2010 14:17

Previous Topic:	V sniping with scope, off?
Next Topic:	CnC3 Map Request

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Dec 01 05:02:25 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01271 seconds