Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums: Tactics and Strategies

Home » Renegade Discussions » Tactics and Strategies » LCG vs Gunner

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: LCG vs Gunner [message #423096 is a reply to message #422958]

Sun, 21 March 2010 23:09

snpr1101
Messages: 425
Registered: June 2007
Location: Australia

Karma:

Commander

Kimb wrote on Sun, 21 March 2010 10:08

snpr1101 wrote on Sun, 21 March 2010 08:43

LCG vs Gunner:

Depends on the range between them.

If we were talking about a distance such as - the distance between the two tunnels leading to the Nod base on Field, then i'd want to be LCG for sure.

Personally, the strategy I use for gunner is to aim at the ground as close to the player as possible, thus as the distance between you and the opponent increases, the harder it gets to land rockets in that area consistently.

I think LCG wins out in all situations, really. Even in close range, why not rush the gunner so the splash damages him as well. I think you have to get lucky with some direct rocket hits to beat an opposing LCG as gunner, providing both players are equally skilled.

I agree with that, but i havent seen the LCG as much as ive seen gunner. People like gunner more for a reason i think

Because in large AOW scenarios, your survivability drops dramatically; thus you want to do as much damage to as many people as quickly as possible. Get in, do damage, get out.

The Gunner is the fastest way to achieve this, fire a rocket, hug a wall.

For obvious reasons, LCG cannot do this.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		LCG vs Gunner By: RoCk2Star on Wed, 14 October 2009 07:16
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: Hitman on Wed, 14 October 2009 07:26
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: Goztow on Wed, 14 October 2009 08:09
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: CarrierII on Wed, 14 October 2009 08:40
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: ArtyWh0re on Wed, 14 October 2009 10:10
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: NukeIt15 on Wed, 14 October 2009 10:46
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: liquidv2 on Wed, 14 October 2009 16:37
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: ErroR on Thu, 15 October 2009 05:45
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: EaZiE on Tue, 02 March 2010 07:33
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: Hitman on Thu, 15 October 2009 13:59
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: NukeIt15 on Thu, 15 October 2009 22:05
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: GEORGE ZIMMER on Thu, 15 October 2009 22:13
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: RoCk2Star on Fri, 16 October 2009 01:03
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: LeeumDee on Fri, 16 October 2009 02:06
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: Sean on Wed, 17 March 2010 08:18
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: HaTe on Wed, 17 March 2010 18:02
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: RoCk2Star on Fri, 16 October 2009 03:50
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: ErroR on Fri, 16 October 2009 05:18
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: Poobuh on Tue, 02 March 2010 22:44
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: HaTe on Sun, 14 March 2010 12:07
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: liquidv2 on Wed, 03 March 2010 19:02
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: Poobuh on Tue, 09 March 2010 18:18
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: anant on Sat, 13 March 2010 17:39
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: archerman on Tue, 09 March 2010 13:39
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: SSADMVR on Mon, 15 March 2010 07:57
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: GEORGE ZIMMER on Mon, 15 March 2010 12:45
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: SSADMVR on Mon, 15 March 2010 14:43
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: snpr1101 on Sun, 21 March 2010 00:43
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: zeratul on Sun, 21 March 2010 02:08
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: Kimb on Sun, 21 March 2010 09:08
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: snpr1101 on Sun, 21 March 2010 23:09
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: GEORGE ZIMMER on Mon, 22 March 2010 08:08
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: badam on Sat, 17 April 2010 21:38
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: liquidv2 on Sat, 17 April 2010 23:07
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: InternetThug on Sat, 17 April 2010 23:35
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: zeratul on Sat, 17 April 2010 23:43
		Re: LCG vs Gunner By: SPIKDUM on Tue, 20 April 2010 12:15

Previous Topic:	wanna be nerd snipers STFU
Next Topic:	mammoth rockets

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Feb 18 16:21:57 MST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01090 seconds