Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » Global Warming: Real or Fraud
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud [message #415472 is a reply to message #415471] |
Fri, 25 December 2009 07:45 |
SPIKDUM
Messages: 58 Registered: December 2009
Karma:
|
Recruit |
|
|
http://www.skepticalscience.com/climate-change-little-ice-age-medieval-warm-peri od.htm
1. Their data is flawed. In terms of Ice ages (like the Last Glacial Maximum) they're off by thousands of years.
2. Once again, climate is a combination of thousands of elements, yet:
Quote: | Our climate is governed by the following principle: when you add more heat to our climate, global temperatures rise. Conversely, when the climate loses heat, temperatures fall.
|
If temperatures rise, they are balanced out somewhere else. If they drop, they are balanced out somewhere else. They assume that there is one global climate, while earth is a patchwork of thousands of climates. When climate change occurs, it is best seen on the EDGES of those climates, because climate zones start to shift (actually, climate change just IS the shifting of climate zones to other positions, Polar, Mid-latitude, Sub-Tropical and Tropical, and their sub-zones. As I said, during Glacials ICE SHEETS grow, meaning that the Polar zones are far larger. Understanding this leads to understanding why there is no single global climate.). THAT'S how you measure climate sensitivity.
Not by:
Quote: | Once you have the change in temperature and radiative forcing, climate sensitivity can be calculated.
|
The fact that there is no global climate that can kill off everything is proven by for instance, Sequoia trees in the USA. These are so-called "Tertiary Relicts", trees that should have been extinct after the Tertiary period ended, yet still flourish. Why? Because of the western mountain ranges in the USA their ecological niches were protected from climate change, thus, the climate zone stayed the same, and the trees survived.
Yet, in all these articles, every argument is based on the assumption that there is a global, fragile, climate that is changing due to CO2 emissions. Through their reasoning, Sequoia trees should not exist, because apparently climate does not occur as a local/regional phenomenon.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-global-warming.htm
Based on the assumption that CO2 is the main cause for climate change. Refer to fourth link comment.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/Are-humans-too-insignificant-to-affect-global-cl imate.htm
Funny, they use two different ice cores from two different regions for three different periods to show the rise of CO2 levels. Quite a coincidence that they don't have one SINGLE ice core that shows the CO2 levels over a longer period of time. Also, the readings from Hawaii show a massive increase over the past 100 years or so. HAWAII IS A VOLCANO. Those readings are utterly worthless. Fail.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/CO2-is-not-the-only-driver-of-climate.htm
Reversal of cause and effect. CO2 does not cause climate change, it's an effect of it and further enhances it. Fail.
As you see here (in a PROPER ice core data set) rising CO2 concentrations are an echo, an aftereffect of rising temperatures and climate changes.
Why this is so is not known, but one plausible explaination is: Less ice sheets, more inhabitable areas of the earth for flora/fauna > More CO2 production. This is probably just one of many causes for CO2 increases though.
The current rising CO2 levels fit in perfectly with the rest of the graph. So if it's our fault that CO2 levels are rising we should go back to the early middle-eastern civilizations 10,000 years ago because look, when humans first started making houses CO2 levels begin te rise! Because they didn't ban housebuilding we now have an unstoppable greenhouse effect!
Also, every 90,000-100,000 years the earth gets far closer to the sun due to changes in it's orbit (one of the Milankovitch cycles). When the temperatures start to rise? Every 90,000-100,000 years. In addition to that the earth's tilt changes every 40,000 years, making it more angled towards or away from the sun within it's orbit. So when the earth's eccentricity and it's obliquity coincide in stages where they are both "forcing" the earth closer to the sun, we have even higher temperature increases. The temperature rises we are experiencing now are nothing compared to the temperature heights in the past.
Same as I said in my first post. All this is BIASED data. Carefully selected to prove a point, not to gain insight into a process.
surth? / surth! wrote on Fri, 25 December 2009 07:47 |
IM STUDYING SO I KNOW IT BETTER K
|
Nope. It's my business to understand what's going on. Knowledge is useless if you don't understand why and how things happen.
You obviously don't know and don't understand.
-
Attachment: WHAT NAO.jpg
(Size: 71.57KB, Downloaded 260 times)
[Updated on: Sat, 26 December 2009 07:23] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: Kamuix on Thu, 17 December 2009 00:31
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: Kamuix on Thu, 17 December 2009 00:53
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: Dover on Thu, 17 December 2009 01:02
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: Kamuix on Thu, 17 December 2009 01:48
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: Sean on Thu, 17 December 2009 02:11
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: kadoosh on Thu, 17 December 2009 08:57
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: nope.avi on Thu, 17 December 2009 05:32
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: luv2pb on Thu, 17 December 2009 15:40
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: zeratul on Thu, 17 December 2009 20:10
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: Homey on Thu, 17 December 2009 23:38
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: zeratul on Sat, 19 December 2009 12:55
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: jnz on Sun, 20 December 2009 01:57
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: Dover on Wed, 23 December 2009 12:31
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: luv2pb on Tue, 22 December 2009 10:39
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: luv2pb on Sat, 19 December 2009 17:02
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: slosha on Sat, 19 December 2009 17:41
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: ChewML on Sat, 19 December 2009 17:45
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: slosha on Sat, 19 December 2009 17:49
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: jnz on Sun, 20 December 2009 02:49
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: SSADMVR on Sun, 20 December 2009 02:47
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: SSADMVR on Sun, 20 December 2009 10:43
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: Renx on Sun, 20 December 2009 12:55
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: SSADMVR on Mon, 21 December 2009 08:20
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: Renx on Sun, 20 December 2009 12:45
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: SSADMVR on Mon, 21 December 2009 09:10
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: Renx on Mon, 21 December 2009 19:22
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: Renx on Sat, 02 January 2010 08:49
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: Shark on Tue, 05 January 2010 16:16
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: zeratul on Sat, 09 January 2010 09:26
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: SSADMVR on Mon, 21 December 2009 09:31
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: SSADMVR on Wed, 23 December 2009 08:23
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: TD on Mon, 21 December 2009 11:09
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: Dover on Thu, 24 December 2009 03:21
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: SPIKDUM on Thu, 24 December 2009 10:15
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: SPIKDUM on Fri, 25 December 2009 06:36
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
|
|
|
Re: Global Warming: Real or Fraud
By: SPIKDUM on Fri, 25 December 2009 07:45
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Nov 30 13:37:28 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01434 seconds
|