Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums: Renegade Global Community Tournament

Home » Archived Forums » Renegade Global Community Tournament » NE vs SoQ Results

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: NE vs SoQ Results [message #413969 is a reply to message #413953]

Sun, 13 December 2009 22:03

blitzkey
Messages: 53
Registered: August 2009

Karma:

Recruit

TD wrote on Sun, 13 December 2009 19:19

blitzkey wrote on Mon, 14 December 2009 02:11

i find the building points stupid, the fact that they won both games but still lose because of 1 building dying i find dumb.

It's a style of gameplay we wanted to try out, and basically C&C is about destroying the enemy and their base.

Yeah but Renegade itself doesnt count building kills, games like these should be won by either basekill by time or points.

They killed one building and decide to camp and LOSE so they can win?

They killed a building, congrats, they got a point lead and should be able to hold on to it to show that they are the better team. They killed the hand, so Nod is low on techs and should slowly kill them all and their base if they were good enough or win by points.

Were they GDI first map? killed the hand, then all fell back to base and camped, then next map they camped again with atleast 1 tech in each building? Fun games!

[Updated on: Sun, 13 December 2009 22:05]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		NE vs SoQ Results By: [NE]Fobby[GEN] on Sun, 13 December 2009 15:06
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: TD on Sun, 13 December 2009 15:08
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: [NE]Fobby[GEN] on Sun, 13 December 2009 15:13
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: Herr Surth on Sun, 13 December 2009 15:13
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: RadioactiveHell on Sun, 13 December 2009 15:19
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: Herr Surth on Sun, 13 December 2009 15:21
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: F1r3st0rm on Sun, 13 December 2009 15:22
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: -SoQ-Warlock on Sun, 13 December 2009 15:23
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: RadioactiveHell on Sun, 13 December 2009 15:25
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: Herr Surth on Sun, 13 December 2009 15:35
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: Vasatron1 on Sun, 13 December 2009 15:30
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: Trojan on Sun, 13 December 2009 15:31
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: RadioactiveHell on Sun, 13 December 2009 15:50
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: TD on Sun, 13 December 2009 16:08
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: blitzkey on Sun, 13 December 2009 18:11
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: TD on Sun, 13 December 2009 18:19
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: blitzkey on Sun, 13 December 2009 22:03
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: [NE]Fobby[GEN] on Sun, 13 December 2009 19:23
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: blitzkey on Sun, 13 December 2009 22:07
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: karmai on Sun, 13 December 2009 22:43
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: [NE]Fobby[GEN] on Sun, 13 December 2009 23:40
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: -SoQ-Warlock on Mon, 14 December 2009 00:22
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: RadioactiveHell on Mon, 14 December 2009 00:08
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: [NE]Fobby[GEN] on Mon, 14 December 2009 00:21
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: Goztow on Mon, 14 December 2009 04:39
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: RadioactiveHell on Tue, 15 December 2009 03:23
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: Goztow on Tue, 15 December 2009 07:37
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: [NE]Fobby[GEN] on Mon, 14 December 2009 11:11
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: blitzkey on Mon, 14 December 2009 13:35
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: [NE]Fobby[GEN] on Mon, 14 December 2009 13:54
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: blitzkey on Mon, 14 December 2009 19:36
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: Herr Surth on Mon, 14 December 2009 13:57
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: Sccrscorer on Mon, 14 December 2009 14:35
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: Wiener on Tue, 15 December 2009 01:59
		Re: NE vs SoQ Results By: [NE]Fobby[GEN] on Tue, 15 December 2009 11:46

Previous Topic:	So why...
Next Topic:	Jelly vs CW.cc results

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Feb 12 10:12:57 MST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01040 seconds