Re: Question about server lists [message #406532 is a reply to message #406346] |
Sat, 10 October 2009 18:42   |
 |
EvilWhiteDragon
Messages: 3751 Registered: October 2005 Location: The Netherlands
Karma:
|
General (3 Stars) |

|
|
Jerad Gray wrote on Fri, 09 October 2009 19:37 |
StealthEye wrote on Fri, 09 October 2009 10:51 | It's true that servers with a 126 max player count will end up on top though. Don't really think that's desirable. However, I don't think there's something better to sort on... Perhaps just random.
|
Goztow wrote on Fri, 09 October 2009 11:35 | your point being?
|
Goztow wrote on Fri, 09 October 2009 09:07 | Passworded never need to be shown on top, nor need non dedicated serevr to be: people that want to join those are looking for them. So what Seye says makes sense .
|
Organize by population, have the people that are looking for you send you an invite. I'd much rather not look at Renegade's bounty of empty servers.
I'd think it made a lot more sense to sort empty servers by ping.
|
It's pretty easy, things like clan,non dedicated, passworded servers are generally not intended for everyone so are moved down on the list. so on top you have the servers you're most probable to join. At the very top you'll have servers which are your favorite. After that you'll get the servers sorted by playercount.

BlackIntel admin/founder/PR dude (not a coder)
Please visit http://www.blackintel.org/
V, V for Vendetta | People should not be afraid of their governments.
Governments should be afraid of their people.
|
|
|
|