Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums: Renegade Global Community Tournament

Home » Archived Forums » Renegade Global Community Tournament » {Os} Vs. SoQ (Round 2 )

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: {Os} Vs. SoQ (Round 2 ) [message #405279 is a reply to message #405257]

Sun, 04 October 2009 12:21

Hitman
Messages: 878
Registered: November 2005
Location: Belgium

Karma:

Colonel

liquidv2 wrote on Sun, 04 October 2009 13:03

it's like they took their 4 best players and only used them so you were forced to play them with your 4 best and it worked out for them because of it

it's a legit strategy; cw.cc could just send h20 in to play and have them 2v2 every community and win if that's how you look at it

if that's what it comes down to then by all means play empty handed, it just makes the whole 10v10 thing seem pointless

i look forward to playing OS, and have no idea which 4 players we will use Razz

dont mention h2o, just say kill lol... h2o would NEVER be that great of a clan if it wasnt for kill

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		{Os} Vs. SoQ (Round 2 ) By: MoMo on Sun, 04 October 2009 08:01
		Re: {Os} Vs. SoQ (Round 2 ) By: -SoQ-Warlock on Sun, 04 October 2009 08:13
		Re: {Os} Vs. SoQ (Round 2 ) By: RadioactiveHell on Sun, 04 October 2009 08:54
		Re: {Os} Vs. SoQ (Round 2 ) By: liquidv2 on Sun, 04 October 2009 10:13
		Re: {Os} Vs. SoQ (Round 2 ) By: -SoQ-Warlock on Sun, 04 October 2009 10:59
		Re: {Os} Vs. SoQ (Round 2 ) By: liquidv2 on Sun, 04 October 2009 11:03
		Re: {Os} Vs. SoQ (Round 2 ) By: Hitman on Sun, 04 October 2009 12:21
		Re: {Os} Vs. SoQ (Round 2 ) By: Tiesto on Sun, 04 October 2009 12:18
		Re: {Os} Vs. SoQ (Round 2 ) By: jakerz on Sun, 04 October 2009 12:59
		Re: {Os} Vs. SoQ (Round 2 ) By: MoMo on Mon, 05 October 2009 12:18

Previous Topic:	Clanwars vs. Atomix (round 2)
Next Topic:	RGCT Round 2/3 & Updates

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Dec 18 06:52:17 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01272 seconds