Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » Is it really Michael Jackson?
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson? [message #402242 is a reply to message #402216] |
Wed, 09 September 2009 12:05 |
|
u6795
Messages: 1261 Registered: March 2006 Location: Maryland
Karma:
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
T0RN wrote on Wed, 09 September 2009 10:43 |
u6795 wrote on Tue, 08 September 2009 18:48 |
T0RN wrote on Tue, 08 September 2009 11:38 | Thanks,I was looking for that hat.
Sorry but he's still a guilty pos.
I can play post a link too,but it dosen't mean anything.
Did you see the interview where that boy was holding hands with him and putting his head on MJs shoulder?Saying they loved each other and nothing wrong with that?
Sick shit.
You probably believe OJ was innocent too. LOL
|
Posting a link means a lot when it contains facts you dipshit, and the facts in this case are he was acquitted and is innocent of the charges. Move on with your life.
Durrp hurr de duurrrrf I bet you think the moon landings were fake also. LOL
|
Just because he was found not guilty dosen't mean he's not guilty.If you're so smart,then you should know our court system fails. ALOT
durrrr durrrrrr
Believe everything you read and take it as fact?
No, but of course, because it's your personal opinion, that means the courts in this case were wrong? Right.
The court does fuck up quite a bit, but in a high profile case such as Michael Goddamn Jackson, the guy who sold the best selling album in world history, do you really think anyone would have let it slide if he faked his way out or in some way WAS guilty?
What's with the insecurity about intelligence, by the way? I never touted myself as smarter than you, but twice in this thread you've made references to Cabal & I as well informed. Thanks?
P.S.
I like how all you "smart" and "well informed" people go straight to the name calling.
Dosen't make you look good.
And you can shove whatever "facts" and the not guilty shit in my face all you want.
He was a sick fuck,and for some reason you fags want to stick up for him.
What you're saying here is that "I believe something is true, therefore it must be true and everyone else is wrong." My bullshit detector is going wild.
P.S. You got to the name calling before I entered this thread. I understand Cabal told you to shut the fuck up, but I wasn't involved in that. Don't try and turn it on me.
And saying OJ is a different story.How so?
He was a guilty prick and found not guilty just like MJ.
OJ was obviously guilty, but the reason he wasn't convicted was because of the racial tensions that were created. MJ's case had NOTHING to do with race. He was never convicted because the overwhelming evidence is he was innocent.
|
And fucking lol @pawky. TIN FOIL HATS & GUVMINT CONSPIRACY!!! MEDIA IS LIES!
Durr. You need to learn to take what the media says with a grain of salt regardless becuase everyone has a tendency to sensationalize the news. That doesn't mean you're a mindless drone for paying attention to it.
yeah
[Updated on: Wed, 09 September 2009 12:07] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Is it really Michael Jackson?
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: slosha on Tue, 30 June 2009 13:05
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: Ryan3k on Wed, 01 July 2009 11:30
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: IAmFenix on Thu, 27 August 2009 12:05
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: T0RN on Sat, 29 August 2009 05:10
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: EaZiE on Fri, 04 September 2009 11:57
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: raven on Fri, 04 September 2009 18:21
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: T0RN on Fri, 04 September 2009 22:55
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: u6795 on Sat, 05 September 2009 09:07
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: T0RN on Fri, 04 September 2009 22:57
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: T0RN on Tue, 08 September 2009 08:38
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: u6795 on Tue, 08 September 2009 15:48
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: Starbuzzz on Tue, 08 September 2009 22:50
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: T0RN on Wed, 09 September 2009 07:43
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: Starbuzzz on Wed, 09 September 2009 09:21
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: u6795 on Wed, 09 September 2009 12:05
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: Kimb on Sun, 13 September 2009 12:04
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: Ryan3k on Tue, 08 September 2009 12:57
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: T0RN on Thu, 10 September 2009 02:58
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: Ryan3k on Thu, 10 September 2009 08:15
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: tellsson on Thu, 10 September 2009 06:10
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: archerman on Tue, 15 September 2009 11:49
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: Iran on Mon, 05 October 2009 14:23
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: Iran on Mon, 05 October 2009 15:24
|
|
|
Re: Is it really Michael Jackson?
By: IAmFenix on Sat, 07 November 2009 12:48
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu Jan 30 14:38:48 MST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00956 seconds
|