Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » Politics - double split
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock [message #400581 is a reply to message #400469] |
Sat, 29 August 2009 07:56 |
spotelmo
Messages: 273 Registered: February 2003 Location: nebraska
Karma:
|
Recruit |
|
|
darkdragon wrote on Fri, 28 August 2009 18:31 |
spotelmo wrote on Fri, 28 August 2009 14:07 | i'd appreciate you sending me a link to what you'd like me to read about dana corporation. from a quick browsing, it seems their a parts supplier that went into bankruptcy and reorganized things including retirement plans.
|
Well most of what they did isn't exactly documented anywhere where I can find anyway. Mainly what they did was cut their dam pensions and take away their health insurance. here's the thing that pisses me off the most. They moved all their assets overseas before they went bankrupt went bankrupt brought the shit back and went on operating like nothing ever happened.
how do I know this my grandpa worked their my Father worked there my uncle worked their and so on. I would have more then likely have gotten a job there if it wasn't for my personal problems and the shit they pulled afew years ago.
Personally I don't prescribe to the class war that you seem to think I do I want to abandon the hole concept of classes and have everyone be = like our country was founded to be.
Dover I suggest you read our constitution and figure out what our government is allowed to do and what they aren't it doesn't give us rights it limits the governments power.
|
if you had proof of any of that, i'm sure the courts and regulators would have loved to see it.
i know it sucks "knowing" something but not being able to prove it. for example, i "know" that the former CEO and senior vice president of the company i work for worked a shady underhanded deal to split up and then sell off the company in order to make themselves millions of dollars out of the deal. i can't prove it, but it was quite obvious in my opinion. you'll never catch me saying that people in corporations are all good people. people are people. whether they be in government, business or wherever. they are nearly always looking out for how they can gain something for themselves or make more money or position themself into more power. that's why SOME government regulation is necessary. however, there is a difference between government regulating things out of necessity and government taking over things that it has no business taking over. it is excessive government regulation and the reaching of government into aspects of our life that it has no business being in that i have a problem with.
as for your statment Quote: | Personally I don't prescribe to the class war that you seem to think I do I want to abandon the hole concept of classes and have everyone be = like our country was founded to be.
|
our country wasn't founded for everyone to be equal, it was founded with the idea that everyone is equal under the law. people aren't equal, some are smarter, some are luckier, some are prettier, some have messed up psychological problems, some are born with more than others. we aren't equal, but under the law we're supposed to be treated equally. most of us know that it often doesn't seem like we're treated equally under the law. a rich white man who steals millions of dollars from his company's pension plan may get 5 years in a minimum security prison while a poor black man who steals a car might get 12 years in a med - max security prison. but the thing is, that has nothing really to do with the law or the constitution that has to do with PEOPLE. it is people (judges, lawyers,jurors, probation office workers, correction officials) who decided to put one in a minimum security country club while putting the other away for hard time. when the PEOPLE start educating themselves about what is going on and start holding those in charge responsible for their actions, that is when we'll see the country being run the way it's supposed to be.
|
|
|
|
|
Politics - double split
By: spotelmo on Thu, 27 August 2009 13:54
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: spotelmo on Thu, 27 August 2009 14:18
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: Romaner on Thu, 27 August 2009 16:43
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: Dover on Thu, 27 August 2009 21:26
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: spotelmo on Thu, 27 August 2009 21:59
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: Dover on Thu, 27 August 2009 22:02
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: spotelmo on Thu, 27 August 2009 22:10
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: Dover on Thu, 27 August 2009 22:26
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: Crimson on Thu, 27 August 2009 23:27
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: Dover on Thu, 27 August 2009 23:47
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: Goztow on Thu, 27 August 2009 23:49
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: spotelmo on Fri, 28 August 2009 02:13
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: Dover on Fri, 28 August 2009 02:41
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: spotelmo on Fri, 28 August 2009 06:02
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: spotelmo on Fri, 28 August 2009 02:18
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: Dover on Fri, 28 August 2009 02:46
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: kadoosh on Fri, 28 August 2009 05:26
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: spotelmo on Fri, 28 August 2009 06:32
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: Dover on Fri, 28 August 2009 14:14
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: Prulez on Sat, 29 August 2009 00:51
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: Dover on Sat, 29 August 2009 01:14
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: Ethenal on Sat, 29 August 2009 08:40
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: Ethenal on Fri, 28 August 2009 08:49
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: kadoosh on Fri, 28 August 2009 10:27
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: spotelmo on Fri, 28 August 2009 11:51
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: spotelmo on Fri, 28 August 2009 14:04
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: Ethenal on Fri, 28 August 2009 12:36
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: spotelmo on Fri, 28 August 2009 14:07
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: spotelmo on Sat, 29 August 2009 07:56
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: liquidv2 on Sat, 29 August 2009 01:15
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: c4onyou8 on Sat, 29 August 2009 01:21
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: liquidv2 on Sat, 29 August 2009 01:24
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: Ryan3k on Sun, 30 August 2009 10:13
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: spotelmo on Sun, 30 August 2009 20:18
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: Ryan3k on Mon, 31 August 2009 12:25
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: kadoosh on Mon, 31 August 2009 18:31
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: Dover on Mon, 31 August 2009 18:40
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: Dover on Sat, 29 August 2009 13:45
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: spotelmo on Sun, 30 August 2009 05:51
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: spotelmo on Sun, 30 August 2009 21:06
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: kadoosh on Mon, 31 August 2009 09:36
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: spotelmo on Mon, 31 August 2009 14:42
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: spotelmo on Mon, 31 August 2009 20:42
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: Dover on Mon, 31 August 2009 20:59
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: spotelmo on Mon, 31 August 2009 21:32
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: Dover on Mon, 31 August 2009 21:49
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
|
|
|
Re: Splitting the record - about the virtual lock
By: Ryan3k on Tue, 01 September 2009 09:19
|
|
|
Re: Politics - double split
|
|
|
Re: Politics - double split
By: Dover on Sun, 30 August 2009 21:34
|
|
|
Re: Politics - double split
By: spotelmo on Sun, 30 August 2009 21:53
|
|
|
Re: Politics - double split
By: Dover on Mon, 31 August 2009 03:39
|
|
|
Re: Politics - double split
By: IAmFenix on Mon, 31 August 2009 18:32
|
|
|
Re: Politics - double split
|
|
|
Re: Politics - double split
By: spotelmo on Mon, 31 August 2009 20:47
|
|
|
Re: Politics - double split
By: spotelmo on Mon, 31 August 2009 22:02
|
|
|
Re: Politics - double split
|
|
|
Re: Politics - double split
By: spotelmo on Tue, 01 September 2009 02:06
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Nov 25 14:00:33 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01592 seconds
|