Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums: General Discussion

Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » Xptek

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: Xptek [message #368624 is a reply to message #368493]

Fri, 23 January 2009 22:55

luv2pb
Messages: 1489
Registered: February 2004

Karma:

General (1 Star)
Not everything is as it appears
Untouchable

EvilWhiteDragon wrote on Fri, 23 January 2009 06:29

Crimson wrote on Thu, 22 January 2009 22:54

If the idea of creating an alternative to XWIS was at all feasible, we'd already be doing it. It's not.

Crimson, the main reason you seem to disagree is because you like XWIS (perhaps because you're an admin there?). Technically we could code an XWIS server, and put the new ip/url in the TT client. Perhaps with an option to MANUALLY switch back to XWIS.
So it is certainly feasible.
Question is more how much time would it take to create such server, and would that delay TT in any way?

If the answer on the first is fast, and the answer on the second is little to nothing then we should at least consider it.

The last possible problem could be that setting up our own XWIS server would be that it would damage our (much needed) relations with EA. This would probably be the biggest problem, because we need EA to ship out the TT patch.

andr3w282 wrote on Fri, 23 January 2009 07:00

DarkDemin wrote on Thu, 22 January 2009 23:56

Crimson wrote on Thu, 22 January 2009 16:54

If the idea of creating an alternative to XWIS was at all feasible, we'd already be doing it. It's not.

Who are you to say something like that? Why are you being such a defeatist about this? Someone like you should either whole-heartedly support this or just stay out of it. Even though developing this system so late in the games life is pretty much pointless why would you come out and be like that?

Maybe because she has a greater foundation and understanding of the current state of renegade, xwis, striketeam, and EA along with the rest of TT then you or majority of the people in this thread ( myself included )?

Well , I will agree that she knows more about Striketeam and EA than me, but I do know she's wrong when she says it's not feasible. It certainly is possible, question is, at what cost?

I have to say the option (though taking it away would be better) included in TT would be huge. Taking it away from strike-team would greatly increase the sucess of TT and prolong the life span of Ren.

N00bstories Director Of Operations

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Xptek By: Spoony on Sun, 21 December 2008 09:11
		Re: Xptek By: Goztow on Sun, 21 December 2008 09:54
		Re: Xptek By: GEORGE ZIMMER on Sun, 21 December 2008 09:59
		Re: Xptek By: Spoony on Sun, 21 December 2008 11:04
		Re: Xptek By: reborn on Sun, 21 December 2008 11:03
		Re: Xptek By: Hitman on Sun, 21 December 2008 11:31
		Re: Xptek By: R315r4z0r on Sun, 21 December 2008 12:03
		Re: Xptek By: GEORGE ZIMMER on Sun, 21 December 2008 13:06
		Re: Xptek By: Spoony on Sun, 21 December 2008 13:46
		Re: Xptek By: Ma1kel on Sun, 21 December 2008 17:01
		Re: Xptek By: spigot on Mon, 22 December 2008 12:52
		Re: Xptek By: Genesis2001 on Mon, 22 December 2008 14:50
		Re: Xptek By: Spoony on Mon, 22 December 2008 15:24
		Re: Xptek By: spigot on Mon, 22 December 2008 15:33
		Re: Xptek By: Genesis2001 on Wed, 21 January 2009 11:21
		Re: Xptek By: Hitman on Wed, 21 January 2009 11:19
		Re: Xptek By: pvtschlag on Wed, 21 January 2009 16:19
		Re: Xptek By: Canadacdn on Wed, 21 January 2009 20:40
		Re: Xptek By: reborn on Thu, 22 January 2009 03:45
		Re: Xptek By: EvilWhiteDragon on Thu, 22 January 2009 08:15
		Re: Xptek By: Goztow on Thu, 22 January 2009 08:21
		Re: Xptek By: reborn on Thu, 22 January 2009 10:35
		Re: Xptek By: pvtschlag on Thu, 22 January 2009 10:50
		Re: Xptek By: Goztow on Thu, 22 January 2009 11:52
		Re: Xptek By: reborn on Thu, 22 January 2009 12:01
		Re: Xptek By: Goztow on Thu, 22 January 2009 12:48
		Re: Xptek By: pvtschlag on Thu, 22 January 2009 14:47
		Re: Xptek By: Crimson on Thu, 22 January 2009 14:54
		Re: Xptek By: GEORGE ZIMMER on Thu, 22 January 2009 15:02
		Re: Xptek By: Canadacdn on Thu, 22 January 2009 18:19
		Re: Xptek By: Ethenal on Thu, 22 January 2009 22:02
		Re: Xptek By: DarkDemin on Thu, 22 January 2009 22:56
		Re: Xptek By: dr3w2 on Thu, 22 January 2009 23:00
		Re: Xptek By: EvilWhiteDragon on Fri, 23 January 2009 04:29
		Re: Xptek By: Genesis2001 on Fri, 23 January 2009 07:44
		Re: Xptek By: luv2pb on Fri, 23 January 2009 22:55
		Re: Xptek By: Goztow on Fri, 23 January 2009 00:44
		Re: Xptek By: Goztow on Fri, 23 January 2009 06:51
		Re: Xptek By: EvilWhiteDragon on Fri, 23 January 2009 07:10
		Re: Xptek By: reborn on Fri, 23 January 2009 12:04
		Re: Xptek By: Memphis on Fri, 23 January 2009 13:51
		Re: Xptek By: Crimson on Sat, 24 January 2009 09:47
		Re: Xptek By: Genesis2001 on Sat, 24 January 2009 11:23
		Re: Xptek By: Goztow on Sat, 24 January 2009 10:48
		Re: Xptek By: CarrierII on Sat, 24 January 2009 11:11
		Re: Xptek By: Crimson on Sat, 24 January 2009 13:22
		Re: Xptek By: Genesis2001 on Sat, 24 January 2009 13:56
		Re: Xptek By: Ethenal on Sat, 24 January 2009 15:17
		Re: Xptek By: EvilWhiteDragon on Sat, 24 January 2009 15:29
		Re: Xptek By: Aprime on Sat, 24 January 2009 23:43
		Re: Xptek By: pvtschlag on Sun, 25 January 2009 01:26
		Re: Xptek By: Ma1kel on Sun, 25 January 2009 10:13
		Re: Xptek By: u6795 on Sun, 25 January 2009 10:20
		Re: Xptek By: CarrierII on Sun, 25 January 2009 14:13
		Re: Xptek By: luv2pb on Sun, 25 January 2009 14:18
		Re: Xptek By: Goztow on Sun, 25 January 2009 14:33
		Re: Xptek By: luv2pb on Mon, 26 January 2009 12:00
		Re: Xptek By: Crimson on Thu, 29 January 2009 02:28
		Re: Xptek By: Crimson on Mon, 26 January 2009 06:34
		Re: Xptek By: CarrierII on Mon, 26 January 2009 16:02
		Re: Xptek By: reborn on Thu, 29 January 2009 03:23

Previous Topic:	.rar
Next Topic:	Rick flair in the new red alert 3 uprising

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Feb 20 11:40:55 MST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01545 seconds