| Re: Bring back Westwood file. [message #361582 is a reply to message #361576] |
Fri, 05 December 2008 17:21   |
 |
Starbuzzz
Messages: 1637
Registered: June 2008
Karma:
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Cabal8616 wrote on Fri, 05 December 2008 17:45 |
| R315r4z0r wrote on Fri, 05 December 2008 15:41 |
They know the most about it and how it's current fans are.
|
Bullshit. C&C3 was shameful. The directing was just way over the top. I don't mind for RA3, that's kind of what RA2 was, and RA3 wasn't meant to be super serious and tie in with the series. But, C&C3 should have been a little bit better. If I recall, Joe Kucan directed the previous C&C games. C&C3, however, he didn't.
I could go in depth as to why C&C3 just isn't very C&C at all, but that should be incredibly obvious when you play it.
| R315r4z0r wrote on Fri, 05 December 2008 15:41 |
And of all companies, Petro would be the WORST one to give rights of the C&C universe to.
|
Lies. Petroglyph is known for making good RTS's. It's mostly because they're not a super duper huge company that they haven't been top notch quality. However, if EA allowed Petroglyph to develop, and EA simply produced, then it would be amazing.
|
Completely agree with you...very valid points. C&C 3 was not good and RA3 is basically C&C 3 but with different units/different universe.
Not to mention the shamelessly uninnovative RTS formula that's been beaten to death hundreds of times before.
Plus RA3 went flying through the ceiling for it's overuse/abuse of female characters and too much comedy. RA2 was fun and humorous too but I always felt it had that sort of dark war tone hanging in there.
Unless EA is given an insanely huge buyout, they are not gonna give up C&C rights.
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
