Home » Renegade Discussions » Tactics and Strategies » LT is shit
Re: LT is shit [message #351796 is a reply to message #351743] |
Mon, 22 September 2008 15:22 |
|
NukeIt15
Messages: 987 Registered: February 2003 Location: Out to lunch
Karma:
|
Colonel |
|
|
Because it is faster and harder to hit than an Arty, can actually hit targets at close range, and is pretty much "sniper" proof because it has heavy armor instead of light? Because the Flame Tank and Stealth Tank both have shit for range, the STank also has shit for armor, and the APC can't do enough damage to stand a chance against a Med? Because it has an extremely low profile and can hide behind low walls in addition to using the same "drive backwards, hide behind cover" tactics that also work for the Arty? Because it is fast and agile enough to evade most of the enemy's return fire?
The answer is "all of the above." Lights kick ass. A group of Arties is made far, far stronger by the addition of one or two Lights in support. Rushes get through the field with more of their strength intact if a Light is around to pick off or suppress midfield threats. Lights can operate independent of repair support because they combine a respectable amount of firepower with both the armor to survive and the speed to run away. That little tank is butter to the bread of any successful Nod team.
"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived of the use of them." - Thomas Paine
Remember, kids: illiteracy is cool. If you took the time to read this, you are clearly a loser who will never get laid. You've been warned.
|
|
|
|
|
LT is shit
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
By: bisen11 on Mon, 22 September 2008 10:38
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
By: sadukar09 on Mon, 22 September 2008 12:26
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
By: NukeIt15 on Mon, 22 September 2008 15:22
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
By: Goztow on Tue, 23 September 2008 05:14
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
By: liquidv2 on Sun, 12 October 2008 22:14
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
By: Xpert on Tue, 23 September 2008 10:28
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
By: NukeIt15 on Tue, 23 September 2008 12:03
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
By: Lone0001 on Tue, 23 September 2008 18:35
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
By: w0dka on Wed, 24 September 2008 09:27
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
By: CarrierII on Thu, 25 September 2008 10:26
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
By: samous on Fri, 10 October 2008 19:16
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
By: rrutk on Sat, 11 October 2008 01:58
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
By: Spoony on Sat, 11 October 2008 08:53
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
By: ErroR on Tue, 14 October 2008 11:25
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
By: liquidv2 on Wed, 15 October 2008 19:07
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
By: ErroR on Thu, 16 October 2008 06:08
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
By: NukeIt15 on Wed, 15 October 2008 20:37
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
By: Ma1kel on Mon, 18 May 2009 10:39
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
By: ErroR on Mon, 18 May 2009 10:52
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
By: Ma1kel on Mon, 18 May 2009 11:08
|
|
|
Re: LT is shit
By: ErroR on Mon, 18 May 2009 11:15
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed Nov 06 11:03:25 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01558 seconds
|