Home » Renegade Discussions » Tactics and Strategies » Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable? [message #317562 is a reply to message #313030] |
Sun, 17 February 2008 11:39 |
|
R315r4z0r
Messages: 3836 Registered: March 2005 Location: New York
Karma:
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
I don't see a problem with Harvester blocking, but using the Ramjet to get a point boost in my book is unfair and I call it exploiting or cheating.
The Ramjet is an anti-infantry weapon and it should be used as such. The Railgun and the PIC are the anti-vehicle weapons.. and the Ramjet should not take their place.
They all cost 1000 creds for a reason. They are supposed to make the player think about what they want to buy. "Should I get anti-infantry... or anti-vehicle"
Making the Ramjet a god weapon that is good against infantry, light vehicles, and giving people a massive point/credit boost just eclipses the roll of the other weapons and makes them pointless.
[Updated on: Sun, 17 February 2008 11:41] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
By: Veyrdite on Wed, 23 January 2008 03:01
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
By: Dover on Wed, 23 January 2008 05:30
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
By: Spoony on Wed, 23 January 2008 08:25
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
By: Dover on Wed, 23 January 2008 16:50
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
By: BlueThen on Wed, 23 January 2008 18:34
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
By: Starbuzz on Thu, 24 January 2008 06:35
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
By: Dover on Thu, 24 January 2008 20:19
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
By: Goztow on Thu, 24 January 2008 09:35
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
By: Spoony on Thu, 24 January 2008 10:09
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
By: Ethenal on Sat, 16 February 2008 11:10
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
By: Veyrdite on Fri, 22 February 2008 20:44
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
By: Spoony on Fri, 22 February 2008 22:08
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
By: Veyrdite on Sat, 23 February 2008 17:30
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
By: Spoony on Sun, 24 February 2008 10:30
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
By: JPNOD on Sun, 24 February 2008 03:52
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
By: Goztow on Mon, 25 February 2008 06:08
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
By: JPNOD on Fri, 04 April 2008 11:02
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
By: Sir Kane on Thu, 10 April 2008 03:03
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
By: Spoony on Thu, 10 April 2008 03:08
|
|
|
Re: Old things that pro's used to do, no longer viable?
By: Homey on Sat, 12 April 2008 23:36
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Nov 12 12:31:10 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01082 seconds
|