Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003â„¢, resurrected in 2024!
Home » Renegade Discussions » Mod Forum » Back to topic
Re: Back to topic [message #31452] Tue, 15 July 2003 21:09 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Captkurt
Messages: 488
Registered: February 2003
Karma:
Commander
Sir Phoenixx

Captkurt

Since the other thread got so Ack’ed up, let me say this, if you have a tutorial and want to have it expanded to more then one place, so more people get it, and why not have it that way? It’s only smarter to have your product in more then one place. And it is your call, not Ack’s, so if this be the case, just send it on over to killer_bee@cox-internet.com, or just email him letting him know it’s ok for him to get it off one of the other sites and/or mirror it. Believe me. If you’re an author of a tutorial in most cases you’re going to do better having it spread out. This whole thing started because Ack does not like Killer_Bee, so he has to start a flame war and ruin his thread. Bottom line.


1. The first reply to turn the discussion personal:
xSeth2k2x

can you ever be positive about anything?


This was said in reply to ACK's "Well, as you just outlined, other sites are already well-known. This is rather pointless, and would serve only to make finding things more difficult.". What ACK said in his first reply to that thread was neither an insult or a "flame". It was just to point out the fact that there are many different sites with tutorials, and it would be almost pointless to do another one. Although it wouldn't make finding things more difficult, it would be pointless to make a new tutorial site that would have the same tutorials that every other site has.

2. The first reply to insult, or attack was made by you.
Captkurt

Aircraftkiller

Well, as you just outlined, other sites are already well-known. This is rather pointless, and would serve only to make finding things more difficult.

I guess you’re the voice for all? (NOT). Only if you have a habit of easily being confused, oh, yea, I forgot this is Ack. LOL Well; in this case you’re probably right. You’re easily confused. Obviously, you admit it. To most people Having more stores to find something in, makes it easier to find that something, but Ack, in your case it’s more difficult, No doubt.
Imdgr8one

He's realistic.

Well in your case, I have to say since you have the same mentality as Ack, I understand why you say he’s realistic. But you both are not in the real world; you’re in your own little micro, bitter worlds. And I think the explanation above will suffice here too. You’re little brains are easily confused. Boo Hoohoo.
Aircraftkiller

xSeth2k2x

can you ever be positive about anything? :rolleyes:

Of course I can, but your post wasn't necessarily the epitome of positive thinking, though.

Like yours are? Come on Ack, you’re the epitome of narcissism and disgust yourself, and the sad thing is, you’re proud of that title, but you just don’t see it. You’ll turn any thread into a flame war, and you’re little minded followers will come and help you. Oooooooohhhhhhhh!

Ack, you’re an idiot. plane and simple.

And now, to the normal people of this forum, it only makes since to me to have more stores to shop at. It’s not going to hurt anything, it will only make it better, you never know when one of the other places will be un-available, so I ask you “send you’re tutorials to Killer_Bee? He’s got all of mine.
Even if you don’t post it here just send them to killer_bee@cox-internet.com


Oh yeah, I see where AircraftKiller "Ack'ed" everything up, lol.

The "flame war" was started by you, CaptKurt.

You crack-a-me up Laughing Laughing Laughing Very Happy Very Happy
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Looking for artists
Next Topic: Multiplayer in single player
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Jul 26 00:25:05 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00782 seconds