Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » ty crimson for renguard
Re: ty crimson for renguard [message #291785 is a reply to message #291706] |
Sun, 21 October 2007 02:29 |
Cunin
Messages: 87 Registered: April 2007
Karma:
|
Recruit |
|
|
Crimson wrote on Sat, 20 October 2007 18:37 | Yeah, zilia is so blatantly lying. In fact she reminds me of Kristin...
|
lol, crime-son
CarrierII wrote on Sat, 20 October 2007 20:11 | Lol...
The simple fact of the matter is, if you haven't released it, we really don't care. Without public access to your Anti-Cheat Software, we (obviously) cannot benefit, and therefore will rely on something else, because we can't use yours.
|
and
Goztow wrote on Sat, 20 October 2007 15:42 | It is technically impossible to block all cheats server side. The best they could do is pur lagreduction completely off but that would only lead to incredible lag, damage not registering, ...
Even with lagreduction off, some cheats would still be possible.
If (s)he comes to tell me ere that they blocked all cheats server side, then I'd prefer them to put their money where their mouth is and show me, or rather the people of BlackIntel who'd be very intrested.
|
Can you please both stop? You'll make zillia laugh so hard that she'll risk a collapse (i need to stop too tbh )
[Updated on: Sun, 21 October 2007 02:33] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
ty crimson for renguard
By: Rocko on Wed, 17 October 2007 14:24
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: zillia on Thu, 18 October 2007 11:40
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: dr3w2 on Thu, 18 October 2007 20:45
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: luv2pb on Thu, 18 October 2007 20:14
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: zillia on Thu, 18 October 2007 22:18
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: luv2pb on Fri, 19 October 2007 07:12
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: Cunin on Fri, 19 October 2007 08:35
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: zillia on Fri, 19 October 2007 14:13
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: zillia on Fri, 19 October 2007 14:50
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: zillia on Fri, 19 October 2007 16:34
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: Cunin on Fri, 19 October 2007 17:39
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: zillia on Fri, 19 October 2007 18:37
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: Starbuzz on Fri, 19 October 2007 22:23
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: Cunin on Sat, 20 October 2007 04:33
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: zillia on Sat, 20 October 2007 17:26
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: Goztow on Sat, 20 October 2007 01:49
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: Goztow on Sat, 20 October 2007 10:10
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: zillia on Sat, 20 October 2007 10:35
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: Goztow on Sat, 20 October 2007 13:42
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: Crimson on Sat, 20 October 2007 16:37
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: Cunin on Sun, 21 October 2007 02:29
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: Tunaman on Sat, 20 October 2007 17:43
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: GsXr1400 on Sat, 20 October 2007 20:14
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: Tunaman on Sat, 20 October 2007 21:06
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: GsXr1400 on Sat, 20 October 2007 22:05
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: BlueThen on Sat, 20 October 2007 22:27
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: Crimson on Sun, 21 October 2007 03:47
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: Ethenal on Sun, 21 October 2007 11:37
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: Starbuzz on Sun, 21 October 2007 17:55
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: Cunin on Sun, 21 October 2007 20:41
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: Crimson on Mon, 22 October 2007 05:20
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
|
|
|
Re: ty crimson for renguard
By: Starbuzz on Mon, 22 October 2007 16:19
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Feb 03 09:03:37 MST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01151 seconds
|