Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums: Heated Discussions and Debates

Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » This should start an arguement.

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: This should start an arguement. [message #281547 is a reply to message #281542]

Wed, 29 August 2007 19:35

nikki6ixx
Messages: 2545
Registered: August 2007

Karma:

General (2 Stars)

Jecht wrote on Wed, 29 August 2007 20:21

He's calling some of these people 'stupid' because even though they were given warning of an impending siege of water wind and whatever earthly hell a hurricane can conjure, many of them made naught an effort to seek better refuge and blatantly disregarded warning that their life was at risk.

Right... except that many had no means of leaving the city.

The FEMA shelters that were offered were subpar, and the processes were grossly mismanaged. Hell, the people were treated like crap in many cases. With all that, of course they'd rather try and stick it out through the storm. All they had to their name was their property, and maybe not even that.

Remember, these people had little or no insurance. So even if they left, they'd come back to nothing. I find it disgusting that people from New Orleans are relying on Red Cross donations, even though they live in the wealthiest nation on Earth.

Quote:

You're incapable of seeing things through the long lens of history, the way our enemies do.

History?... maybe instead of looking to the past, YOU SHOULD BE LOOKING TOWARD THE FUTURE FOR CHRISSAKE!

Quote:

This statement is one of the biggest piles of literary bullshit I've ever seen. Anyone who has ever been to High School History class could tell you what the consequences are for disregarding the past, even though the author didn't intend the message to deliver that type of message.

The Author likely meant that this process takes time, and most people are so caught up on deadlines that they believe nothing is getting done, just because they're not getting done now.

Can you blame people for thinking like that? Wasn't it George Bush who donned a flight suit, and held a press conference on the USS Abraham Lincoln with a massive banner behind him that read, "Mission Accomplished" ... on May 1st, 2003... which was like, four years ago? Sarcasm

Talk about 'deadlines' . Seeing as the war began on March 20th, 2003, it would be hypocritical of Bush to even lecture people on 'deadlines' . The White House certainly thought they could win in a few short months... which is the opposite of taking a long time.

As for the 'looking to the past' comment... well, this administration certainly didn't do their homework in Middle East History 101. If they had looked to the past, and critically evaluated it, there'd likely be no Iraq war. That's because the Middle East was a powderkeg, filled to the brim with religious hostility, big ego's, burning sun, and hot sand; not exactly a great place to cause a scuffle.

Quote:

I really want to know who the author is. Probably some idiot in a Klan clubhouse, or in some shanty in Utah.

Quote:

This quote made me laugh, simply because probably not five minutes prior to typing this little gem, you made reference to the problems that generalizing displays:

Quote:

Calling some of America's poorest 'stupid' just goes to show what an ignorant fucktard the author is.

You kicked Mr. Irony right in the crown jewels there.

I take issue with him calling some of America's poorest 'stupid' because my life wasn't always peaches and 'Super Nintendo-after-school'.

I'm not sure about yours...

...but I doubt you've ever collected bottles for anything other than a school bottle drive. I guess I used to be 'stupid' .

Calling poor people, 'stupid' , is ignorant. I guess all those people in Bangladesh are 'stupid'. China must be full of 'stupid' people too. Hell, Africa must be a whole continent of 'stupid'. I guess all those homeless people on our streets suffering from Schizophrenia and Depression are 'stupid' too, huh?

Renegade:

Aircraftkiller wrote on Fri, 10 January 2014 16:56

The only game where everyone competes to be an e-janitor.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		This should start an arguement. By: DarkDemin on Mon, 27 August 2007 22:45
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: Rocko on Mon, 27 August 2007 23:14
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: Renerage on Mon, 27 August 2007 23:15
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: DarkDemin on Mon, 27 August 2007 23:24
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: Canadacdn on Tue, 28 August 2007 00:15
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: Rocko on Tue, 28 August 2007 16:31
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: Jecht on Tue, 28 August 2007 01:09
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: Starbuzz on Tue, 28 August 2007 01:58
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: Deamond11 on Tue, 28 August 2007 02:31
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: DarkDemin on Tue, 28 August 2007 11:38
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: Starbuzz on Tue, 28 August 2007 12:59
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: argathol3 on Tue, 28 August 2007 07:38
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: Memphis on Tue, 28 August 2007 09:33
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: nikki6ixx on Tue, 28 August 2007 12:18
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: z310 on Tue, 28 August 2007 13:52
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: cheesesoda on Tue, 28 August 2007 14:14
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: nikki6ixx on Tue, 28 August 2007 14:34
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: cheesesoda on Tue, 28 August 2007 14:44
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: sadukar09 on Tue, 28 August 2007 17:13
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: nikki6ixx on Tue, 28 August 2007 18:40
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: Jecht on Wed, 29 August 2007 18:21
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: nikki6ixx on Wed, 29 August 2007 19:35
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: Jecht on Wed, 29 August 2007 21:03
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: puddle_splasher on Thu, 30 August 2007 01:57
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: DarkDemin on Fri, 31 August 2007 00:17
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: Canadacdn on Tue, 28 August 2007 19:25
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: Starbuzz on Tue, 28 August 2007 21:22
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: prasp on Wed, 29 August 2007 13:57
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: cheesesoda on Wed, 29 August 2007 20:00
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: nikki6ixx on Wed, 29 August 2007 20:53
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: nikki6ixx on Wed, 29 August 2007 21:34
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: Rocko on Wed, 29 August 2007 22:29
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: nikki6ixx on Wed, 29 August 2007 23:29
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: Jecht on Thu, 30 August 2007 01:43
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: qwertwert125 on Thu, 27 September 2007 16:49
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: Muad Dib15 on Thu, 27 September 2007 18:37
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: Jerad2142 on Tue, 02 October 2007 11:25
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: nikki6ixx on Thu, 27 September 2007 21:54
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: ron paul on Wed, 03 October 2007 10:06
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: Jecht on Wed, 03 October 2007 10:39
		Re: This should start an arguement. By: ron paul on Wed, 03 October 2007 14:10

Previous Topic:	Who's got the accent?
Next Topic:	Michigan is in a swirling-eddie of despair

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Dec 02 02:12:51 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01229 seconds