Home » Renegade Discussions » Tactics and Strategies » Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??) [message #234362 is a reply to message #234360] |
Fri, 15 December 2006 12:39 |
|
Sniper_De7
Messages: 866 Registered: April 2004 Location: Wisconsin
Karma:
|
Colonel |
|
|
crazfulla wrote on Fri, 15 December 2006 13:06 | Re: Sniper_De7, A little FYI, point whoring does not always get you the win. You think, if GDI has been point whoring all game, that they deserve the win? If they leave the ped unguarded adn Nod is sneaky enough to nuke it, I laugh in GDi's face.
Re: Goztow, I agree completely. I play for fun, and for the win. Not for points or kills or recs or ladders like some people. Larger games where people pointwhore for half an hour aren't exactly my idea of 'fun'.
|
First thanks for editing your post
second, Quote: | I don't mind if someone else nukes the pedistal and gets a cheap win when versing me in like a 1v1, if I've killed 3/4 of thier buildings I still get the MVP rec at the start of the next round.
|
Kinda goes against what you're saying doesn't it.
as for the rest of your post, i already explained it - Pointwhoring is a term made up by public server morons who complain that people buy tanks and win the game for their team. But in the case you mentioned, if GDI managed to shoot at their buildings all game and Nod did nothing to stop it, hell yeah they deserved it. Obviously Nod wasn't a good enough team to stop GDI. They had to resort to a pedestal nuke to win. Something that takes absolutely NO teamwork for a team to win by. Now if you say something like GDI was shooting at building the entire time, didn't try to go and nuke, and Nod being the good team, managed to buy 6 stanks without GDI knowing and managed to either sneak attack or whatever and kill GDI's base. Then yeah. But if all Nod did was sit on their pinkys repairing the base because GDI were too powerful, and only got a win off a setting that doesn't even make sense in the realm of C&C and completely goes against any idea of needing teamwork to win a game, I just don't agree. There is at some point where shooting at a building over and over becomes unneccesary if the lead is big enough and I don't really see a point in it, but I don't see why Nod least of all should deserve a win by a single person sneaking a nuke in. It's more that GDI deserved the win but didn't do all that was necessary. Like I said though, Nod sure as hell didn't deserve to win if they didn't even try to kill their tanks.
Oderint, dum metuant.
It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat. - Theodore "Teddy" Roosevelt
|
|
|
|
|
Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: Goztow on Wed, 13 December 2006 05:56
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: Goztow on Tue, 31 July 2007 23:45
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: Tunaman on Tue, 31 July 2007 23:59
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: Renerage on Thu, 02 August 2007 16:43
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: fl00d3d on Wed, 13 December 2006 14:32
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: Goztow on Wed, 13 December 2006 15:11
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: Nglegs on Wed, 13 December 2006 17:15
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: fl00d3d on Wed, 13 December 2006 20:21
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: Dover on Sun, 17 December 2006 17:58
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: Dover on Mon, 18 December 2006 00:51
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: fl00d3d on Wed, 13 December 2006 22:40
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: Goztow on Thu, 14 December 2006 01:07
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: fl00d3d on Thu, 14 December 2006 12:45
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: Spoony on Sat, 16 December 2006 17:53
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: fl00d3d on Thu, 14 December 2006 13:55
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: Spoony on Fri, 15 December 2006 03:14
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: Goztow on Fri, 15 December 2006 00:43
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: Goztow on Sat, 16 December 2006 01:25
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: JPNOD on Sun, 17 December 2006 07:16
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: fl00d3d on Sun, 17 December 2006 23:38
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: Jzinsky on Fri, 29 December 2006 09:41
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: Jzinsky on Wed, 25 July 2007 03:15
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: Homey on Sat, 28 July 2007 23:43
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: Spoony on Mon, 30 July 2007 04:05
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: Homey on Thu, 02 August 2007 17:05
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: blly on Thu, 02 August 2007 17:43
|
|
|
Re: Ped Beacons (n00by or teh pwn??)
By: T0RN on Tue, 07 August 2007 06:58
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Nov 05 01:08:52 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01571 seconds
|