Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » Visual Basics
Re: Visual Basics [message #230002 is a reply to message #229992] |
Sat, 11 November 2006 10:37 |
|
Dave Anderson
Messages: 1953 Registered: December 2004 Location: United States
Karma:
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Silent Kane wrote on Sat, 11 November 2006 08:47 |
Dave Anderson wrote on Thu, 09 November 2006 20:48 | You're right. It has horrible syntax and is an unstable language. However, a lot of people are attracted to it because of its "English like" syntax.
|
And C++ and such don't have ""English like" syntax"?
Also, Java and VisualBullshit are NOT a good language to start with. About all languages are "easy" to learn, difference is that VB and Java are slow and are rather limited.
|
Not like Visual Basic does. For example, the simple if-then-else statement.
Visual Basic:
If condition Then
action
Else
action
End If
C#, C++, J#..
if (condition)
{
action
}
else
{
action
}
The difference is that beginner programmers do not like the syntax of having brackets and other interesting characters in their code. A poll was taken on the Microsoft Forums a while back and some 70% or more of the beginner programmers who voted had voted for Visual Basic for that reason.
Quote: | Also, Java and VisualBullshit are NOT a good language to start with. About all languages are "easy" to learn, difference is that VB and Java are slow and are rather limited.
|
Visual Basic is a good language to start with despite it being slow and unstable. A lot of the syntax for things such as creating arrays are more simple in VB. The language being limited has no bearing on whether it is a good language to start with or not. When you first learn a language, you're not going to care whether you have the fine tuned control like you do in C++ or C#, you want to learn the basics and learn the logic.
David Anderson
Founder, Software Consultant
DCOM Productions
Microsoft Partner (MSP)
[Updated on: Sat, 11 November 2006 10:41] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Visual Basics
By: BlueThen on Thu, 09 November 2006 14:30
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: cmatt42 on Thu, 09 November 2006 14:37
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: Viking on Thu, 09 November 2006 15:10
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: bandie63 on Thu, 09 November 2006 15:30
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: bandie63 on Thu, 09 November 2006 18:11
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: icedog90 on Thu, 09 November 2006 15:30
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: Sir Kane on Thu, 09 November 2006 19:42
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: Sir Kane on Sat, 11 November 2006 08:47
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: icedog90 on Sat, 11 November 2006 14:57
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: icedog90 on Thu, 09 November 2006 21:53
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: light on Fri, 10 November 2006 19:29
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: light on Sat, 11 November 2006 12:39
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: icedog90 on Thu, 09 November 2006 23:25
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: bandie63 on Fri, 10 November 2006 15:13
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: icedog90 on Fri, 10 November 2006 19:56
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: Ma1kel on Sat, 11 November 2006 09:26
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: fl00d3d on Sat, 11 November 2006 15:06
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: Sir Kane on Sun, 12 November 2006 03:46
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: Jonty on Sun, 12 November 2006 05:57
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: icedog90 on Sat, 11 November 2006 15:16
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: fl00d3d on Sat, 11 November 2006 15:20
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: icedog90 on Sat, 11 November 2006 15:29
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: bandie63 on Sat, 11 November 2006 15:39
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: Sanada78 on Sat, 11 November 2006 15:54
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: BlueThen on Sat, 11 November 2006 16:50
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
|
|
|
Re: Visual Basics
By: fl00d3d on Sat, 11 November 2006 19:12
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Nov 25 05:30:53 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01606 seconds
|