Home » Archived Forums » RenGuard Network Bans » what would
| Re: what would [message #206668 is a reply to message #202384] |
Wed, 05 July 2006 13:55   |
 |
DreamWraith
Messages: 130
Registered: November 2005
Karma:
|
Recruit |
|
|
Just because certain persons do not choose to use cheats in single player, does not mean that anyone who uses cheats in single player are "cheating themselves" or doing some great wrong. To say that is just stupid.
Just because a person doesn't care about saying "i beat the game on legendary w/o cheaing lolk", or being able to claim "dewd ive never cheated in sp" doesn't mean they are cheating themselves.
It is all a matter of choice. Maybe your life, and your self worth, depends on not cheating in a single player game. Maybe that is what is all important to you.
I think for most people, there are far more important things. Sometimes people don't CARE about "being skilled". I know i sure in the hell could care less.
When I have played renegade online on the rare occasion, i have gotten utterly slaughtered. Do I care? No, because *gasp* I do not live my life to be good at games. Games are merely a form of entertainment to pass the time.
For you to say someone cheating in single player is cheating themselves, is only taking your personal feelings and applying them to every human being.
Some people could care less about "epenis" and would rather have fun in games (such as the GTA example mentioned earlier).
Games are intended to be fun. If a person lacks gaming skill, and thus chooses to "cheat" in single player in order to actually be able to experience the game, who are you to discount that?
If a person could care less about completing the game, and just wants to run around doing funny shit, in *gasp* a game, meant for entertainment, who are you to say they should do otherwise?
A person cheating in single player is no different than a person who only watches the last couple episodes of a series like american idol.
Not everyone cares about the "big picture" or "pure experience". And they don't and shouldn't have to, they are just GAMES.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
what would
|
|
|
Re: what would
By: Kanezor on Sat, 03 June 2006 16:26 |
|
|
Re: what would
|
|
|
Re: what would
|
|
|
Re: what would
|
|
|
Re: what would
|
|
|
Re: what would
By: light on Mon, 12 June 2006 00:52 |
|
|
Re: what would
By: Kanezor on Wed, 07 June 2006 19:39 |
|
|
Re: what would
By: Dover on Thu, 08 June 2006 01:03 |
|
|
Re: what would
|
|
|
Re: what would
By: Dover on Thu, 08 June 2006 11:38 |
|
|
Re: what would
|
|
|
Re: what would
By: xtaro on Sun, 11 June 2006 13:25 |
|
|
Re: what would
By: Goztow on Sun, 11 June 2006 02:13 |
|
|
Re: what would
By: Ma1kel on Fri, 16 June 2006 16:46 |
|
|
Re: what would
By: Ma1kel on Sun, 11 June 2006 11:08 |
|
|
Re: what would
By: Goztow on Mon, 12 June 2006 00:08 |
|
|
Re: what would
|
|
|
Re: what would
|
|
|
Re: what would
|
|
|
Re: what would
By: dead6re on Wed, 14 June 2006 11:04 |
|
|
Re: what would
|
|
|
Re: what would
|
|
|
Re: what would
By: Goztow on Fri, 16 June 2006 22:49 |
|
|
Re: what would
|
|
|
Re: what would
By: Berkut on Wed, 05 July 2006 21:47 |
|
|
Re: what would
By: Goztow on Wed, 05 July 2006 23:55 |
|
|
Re: what would
By: Renx on Thu, 06 July 2006 11:47 |
|
|
Re: what would
|
|
|
Re: what would
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed May 14 01:01:07 MST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02357 seconds
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
