Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums: Tactics and Strategies

Home » Renegade Discussions » Tactics and Strategies » n00bjet-no

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: n00bjet-no [message #196806 is a reply to message #196804]

Mon, 17 April 2006 20:37

nukchebi0
Messages: 58
Registered: April 2006

Karma:

Recruit

Sniper_De7 wrote on Mon, 17 April 2006 22:03

nukchebi0 wrote on Mon, 17 April 2006 21:07

Sniper_De7 wrote on Mon, 17 April 2006 18:42

nukchebi0 wrote on Mon, 17 April 2006 20:33

Considering Nod has artillery which can distract Havocs or easily kill them at long ranges, I think that any Apache driver who doesn't support, but goes commando, should get blown out of the air. If the U.S. had initially bombed Iraq with B-52 and a lack of jamming at the beginning of our wars with them, then the U.S. Army would be sitting in their bases right now, and Sadam Hussein would be in one of his 394 palaces, as the casualty rate for the bomber crews would have been at least 80% and the public opinion of the war would drop down the roof. But we removed the air defense with jamming, F-117's and cruise missile, so when our susceptible aircraft arrived, they would blow the crud out of Iraq while having a casualty rate of 0%.

Uh.... thanks for that information?

Artilleries can easily kill havocs at long range? are you serious? Either the havoc is entirely stupid all-together or... well the havoc is entirely too stupid. (Which goes with my point that it's normally someone who sucks buying n00bjets)

I also fail to see how going out into the middle of city flying where my teammates are and getting shot by like 5 n00bjets constitutes as "going commnado" and it still doesn't address the fact that ramjets do insane damage. I'd have no problem if there was some kind of limit on the number of n00bjets you could buy. I can honestly handle probably 2-3 pretty easily on a map say city fly. But when you've got like a band of 5 n00bjets on the bridge and you die in less than 2 seconds, that it isn't fair at all.

And still just because it's light armoured doesn't mean it should do insane amount of damage, i don't care what the fuck it would do in a realistic event, if it's going to do damage at least make it reasonable, not 5 hits and a copter is dead or i believe it's 7 and an arty is. A rocket soldier should be more effective at killing light armoured vehicles no matter what, as would railguns/pics, so yeah, why would the ramjet do the most damage out of all of these

1. I said distract. If the Havoc is trying to gun a copter down, an artillery can easily massacre them.

2. If they are on the bridge then you can buy a flamer and run them over.

3. Rocket soldiers do more damage to heavily armoured vehicles than Havocs, and the PIC/Railgun does too. However the ramjet is a instant hit owning to the muzzle velocity of a mile per second, while the rocket can't hit anything but heavily armored vehicles without much trouble.

Since the PIC/Railgun does the same amount of damage to infantry, but still annoys/destroys vehicles at long ranges, then it really is a better buy than the ramjet, but people can buy what they choose. Personally, I buy the sniper rifle to snipe, since I will be getting headshots, the ramjet to defend a base, since engineers die with a body shot, and a PIC/Railgun to drive away vehicles. I never buy the Volt-Auto Rifle, due to its range (what range?).

and no, an artillery can't "massacre" an infantry because of many things.
1. IT doesn't even hit where you tell you it to hit often times
2. the artillery shells travel so slow that you can often times dodge them if you see them.
3. A havoc should be able to get off about 7 shots before an artillery could kill him.
4. You can easily run away even if you did have low health. Since they're so slow

this all doesn't tell me the exact principle of the fairness of copters being able to get killed in 5 hits, 5 hits takes around 6 seconds and probably 3-4 if you had two 1000 dollar characters. how in god's name can you call that fair? A 900 dollar unit shouldn't be able to be killed with a gun that already shoots instantly and capacity to shoot 4 rounds, not to mention its UNLIMITED range. I'd bet you if it took an ounce of skill for snipers to shoot copters (say the bullet didn't travel instantly) They'd probably give up entirely and probably quit city flying. Because I've seen it plenty of times before where people flat out QUIT after losing the barracks even after I kill their n00bjets multiple times. Which makes me believe that the only units they can do good in is a n00bjet, which means that it is overpowered and too easy to use.

Like I said, even on field people use snipers to kill artilleries/mrls. They don't even TRY to use a tank. Often times it's usually their first unit they buy and even if you kill them they'll still come back again and again probably not once buying a med tank - why? because it takes no skill what-so-ever to shoot light armoured vehicles with a gun that does massive damage and has unlimited range

If copters are that susceptible to ground fire (they get pawned by any machine gun), wouldn't that be a minor hint that they are a waste of money, which should be spend on ramjet infantry to eliminate theirs.

Also, they standard sniper rifle is almost as quick of a destruction for helicopters. Why don't you complain concerning that?

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Mon, 17 April 2006 17:50
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Mon, 17 April 2006 18:06
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Mon, 17 April 2006 18:18
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Mon, 17 April 2006 18:26
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Mon, 17 April 2006 18:33
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Mon, 17 April 2006 18:42
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Mon, 17 April 2006 19:07
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Mon, 17 April 2006 20:03
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Mon, 17 April 2006 20:37
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Mon, 17 April 2006 21:15
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Mon, 17 April 2006 22:12
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Mon, 17 April 2006 18:36
		Re: n00bjet-no By: jnz on Wed, 19 July 2006 11:10
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PlastoJoe on Mon, 17 April 2006 20:43
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Mon, 17 April 2006 22:13
		Re: n00bjet-no By: terminator 101 on Mon, 17 April 2006 21:08
		Re: n00bjet-no By: terminator 101 on Mon, 17 April 2006 22:45
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PlastoJoe on Mon, 17 April 2006 22:49
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Goztow on Mon, 17 April 2006 23:36
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Tue, 18 April 2006 11:22
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Dave Mason on Tue, 18 April 2006 05:14
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Tue, 18 April 2006 05:41
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Tue, 18 April 2006 11:20
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mrpirate on Tue, 18 April 2006 12:48
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Lijitsu on Tue, 18 April 2006 13:43
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Tunaman on Tue, 18 April 2006 21:33
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Wed, 19 April 2006 09:24
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mrpirate on Wed, 19 April 2006 10:05
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Wed, 19 April 2006 12:29
		Re: n00bjet-no By: TFL Lord PhantomBMAN on Wed, 19 April 2006 12:35
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PlastoJoe on Tue, 18 April 2006 15:13
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Wed, 19 April 2006 09:26
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Dover on Tue, 18 April 2006 16:41
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PlastoJoe on Wed, 19 April 2006 09:39
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Wed, 19 April 2006 09:40
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PlastoJoe on Wed, 19 April 2006 13:53
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Lijitsu on Wed, 19 April 2006 14:07
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mrpirate on Wed, 19 April 2006 15:16
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Wed, 19 April 2006 18:14
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Feetseek on Wed, 19 April 2006 18:19
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Wed, 19 April 2006 18:21
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Feetseek on Wed, 19 April 2006 18:27
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Wed, 19 April 2006 18:34
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Feetseek on Wed, 19 April 2006 18:40
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Wed, 19 April 2006 18:44
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Wed, 19 April 2006 18:44
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Wed, 19 April 2006 18:47
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Tunaman on Wed, 19 April 2006 19:23
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Wed, 19 April 2006 19:37
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Tunaman on Wed, 19 April 2006 20:11
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Wed, 19 April 2006 20:31
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Wed, 19 April 2006 18:56
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Wed, 19 April 2006 19:08
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PlastoJoe on Thu, 20 April 2006 10:45
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Thu, 20 April 2006 11:27
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Dover on Thu, 20 April 2006 11:35
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Thu, 20 April 2006 11:52
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mrpirate on Wed, 19 April 2006 18:58
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Wed, 19 April 2006 19:16
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Wed, 19 April 2006 19:39
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Wed, 19 April 2006 19:48
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Wed, 19 April 2006 20:27
		Re: n00bjet-no By: havoc9826 on Wed, 19 April 2006 21:11
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Feetseek on Wed, 19 April 2006 21:35
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mrpirate on Wed, 19 April 2006 21:54
		Re: n00bjet-no By: havoc9826 on Wed, 19 April 2006 23:03
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Aircraftkiller on Fri, 21 April 2006 09:27
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Dover on Wed, 19 April 2006 21:17
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Thu, 20 April 2006 05:25
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Thu, 20 April 2006 11:30
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mrpirate on Thu, 20 April 2006 05:51
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Kamuix on Thu, 20 April 2006 10:25
		Re: n00bjet-no By: flyingfox on Thu, 20 April 2006 11:54
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Thu, 20 April 2006 19:30
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PlastoJoe on Thu, 20 April 2006 13:41
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Dover on Fri, 21 April 2006 09:17
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PlastoJoe on Fri, 21 April 2006 09:31
		Re: n00bjet-no By: terminator 101 on Fri, 21 April 2006 10:18
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Dover on Fri, 21 April 2006 12:07
		Re: n00bjet-no By: ripred999 on Fri, 19 May 2006 09:25
		Re: n00bjet-no By: ripred999 on Fri, 19 May 2006 09:27
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Fri, 19 May 2006 11:22
		Re: n00bjet-no By: w0dka on Sat, 20 May 2006 00:11
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Alexraptor on Sat, 20 May 2006 06:09
		Re: n00bjet-no By: superj69 on Sat, 20 May 2006 16:49
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Alexraptor on Sat, 20 May 2006 17:25
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Sat, 20 May 2006 17:42
		Re: n00bjet-no By: ripred999 on Sun, 21 May 2006 14:53
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Sun, 21 May 2006 15:24
		Re: n00bjet-no By: w0dka on Mon, 22 May 2006 00:32
		Re: n00bjet-no By: MexPirate on Mon, 22 May 2006 05:43
		Re: n00bjet-no By: ripred999 on Mon, 22 May 2006 06:21
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Mon, 22 May 2006 06:28
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Goztow on Mon, 22 May 2006 06:54
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Mon, 22 May 2006 07:05
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Goztow on Mon, 22 May 2006 07:40
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Mon, 22 May 2006 07:51
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Goztow on Mon, 22 May 2006 11:45
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Alexraptor on Mon, 22 May 2006 08:16
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Mon, 22 May 2006 08:25
		Re: n00bjet-no By: ripred999 on Tue, 23 May 2006 08:39
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Mon, 22 May 2006 12:39
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Mon, 22 May 2006 13:48
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Alexraptor on Mon, 22 May 2006 13:55
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Tue, 23 May 2006 09:11
		Re: n00bjet-no By: ripred999 on Tue, 23 May 2006 14:23
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Alexraptor on Tue, 23 May 2006 12:00
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Spoony on Wed, 24 May 2006 07:07
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Tue, 23 May 2006 12:03
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Tue, 23 May 2006 12:20
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Tue, 23 May 2006 15:01
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mrpirate on Tue, 23 May 2006 15:02
		Re: n00bjet-no By: MexPirate on Tue, 23 May 2006 15:27
		Re: n00bjet-no By: ripred999 on Tue, 23 May 2006 16:39
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Tue, 23 May 2006 16:41
		Re: n00bjet-no By: ripred999 on Tue, 23 May 2006 16:54
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Wed, 24 May 2006 03:51
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Tue, 23 May 2006 17:08
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Aircraftkiller on Tue, 23 May 2006 19:52
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Alexraptor on Wed, 24 May 2006 03:35
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Daze on Wed, 24 May 2006 04:40
		Re: n00bjet-no By: ripred999 on Wed, 24 May 2006 05:54
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Wed, 24 May 2006 06:40
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Alexraptor on Wed, 24 May 2006 05:19
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Wed, 24 May 2006 05:29
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Wed, 24 May 2006 05:36
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Wed, 24 May 2006 06:09
		Re: n00bjet-no By: ripred999 on Wed, 24 May 2006 06:11
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Spoony on Wed, 24 May 2006 07:00
		Re: n00bjet-no By: ripred999 on Wed, 24 May 2006 07:09
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Wed, 24 May 2006 07:16
		Re: n00bjet-no By: ripred999 on Wed, 24 May 2006 07:43
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PlastoJoe on Wed, 24 May 2006 06:41
		Re: n00bjet-no By: ripred999 on Wed, 24 May 2006 06:50
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Wed, 24 May 2006 06:59
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Goztow on Wed, 24 May 2006 07:47
		Re: n00bjet-no By: ripred999 on Wed, 24 May 2006 07:48
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Spoony on Wed, 24 May 2006 15:57
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PackHunter on Thu, 25 May 2006 02:55
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Wed, 24 May 2006 07:53
		Re: n00bjet-no By: ripred999 on Wed, 24 May 2006 07:54
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Wed, 24 May 2006 07:59
		Re: n00bjet-no By: ripred999 on Wed, 24 May 2006 08:02
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Wed, 24 May 2006 08:11
		Re: n00bjet-no By: ripred999 on Wed, 24 May 2006 08:35
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mision08 on Wed, 24 May 2006 11:49
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Aircraftkiller on Wed, 24 May 2006 16:15
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Wed, 24 May 2006 16:46
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Thu, 25 May 2006 03:09
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Spoony on Thu, 25 May 2006 03:49
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PackHunter on Thu, 25 May 2006 04:00
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Spoony on Thu, 25 May 2006 06:00
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Aircraftkiller on Thu, 25 May 2006 05:42
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Thu, 25 May 2006 05:43
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PackHunter on Thu, 25 May 2006 06:27
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Spoony on Thu, 25 May 2006 17:23
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Goztow on Fri, 26 May 2006 00:44
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Thu, 25 May 2006 06:31
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PackHunter on Thu, 25 May 2006 06:34
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Aircraftkiller on Thu, 25 May 2006 06:40
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Thu, 25 May 2006 06:44
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PackHunter on Thu, 25 May 2006 07:24
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mrpirate on Thu, 25 May 2006 08:08
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Thu, 25 May 2006 07:32
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PackHunter on Thu, 25 May 2006 07:40
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Thu, 25 May 2006 07:35
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Thu, 25 May 2006 08:00
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Dover on Thu, 25 May 2006 08:10
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PackHunter on Thu, 25 May 2006 09:00
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Aircraftkiller on Thu, 25 May 2006 09:31
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PackHunter on Thu, 25 May 2006 09:48
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Thu, 25 May 2006 10:04
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PackHunter on Thu, 25 May 2006 10:10
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mrpirate on Thu, 25 May 2006 10:35
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PackHunter on Thu, 25 May 2006 11:02
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Aircraftkiller on Thu, 25 May 2006 10:16
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PackHunter on Thu, 25 May 2006 10:54
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Thu, 25 May 2006 11:08
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Aircraftkiller on Thu, 25 May 2006 11:08
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PackHunter on Thu, 25 May 2006 11:14
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Aircraftkiller on Thu, 25 May 2006 11:18
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PackHunter on Thu, 25 May 2006 11:20
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Thu, 25 May 2006 11:38
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PackHunter on Thu, 25 May 2006 11:41
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mrpirate on Thu, 25 May 2006 11:09
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Thu, 25 May 2006 11:10
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mrpirate on Thu, 25 May 2006 11:11
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Thu, 25 May 2006 11:20
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Goztow on Thu, 25 May 2006 11:28
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Alexraptor on Thu, 25 May 2006 16:09
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Dover on Thu, 25 May 2006 11:43
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Thu, 25 May 2006 12:17
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Spoony on Fri, 26 May 2006 05:09
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Dover on Fri, 26 May 2006 11:12
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PackHunter on Fri, 26 May 2006 13:58
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Fri, 26 May 2006 16:06
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Aircraftkiller on Fri, 26 May 2006 17:55
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Spoony on Fri, 26 May 2006 17:56
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Aircraftkiller on Fri, 26 May 2006 18:04
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Kamuix on Fri, 26 May 2006 18:22
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PackHunter on Fri, 26 May 2006 23:04
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Goztow on Sat, 27 May 2006 02:59
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PackHunter on Sat, 27 May 2006 03:03
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Sun, 28 May 2006 15:12
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Aircraftkiller on Sun, 28 May 2006 15:24
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Dover on Sun, 28 May 2006 19:24
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Sun, 28 May 2006 19:35
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Sun, 28 May 2006 19:48
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Sun, 28 May 2006 20:47
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Aircraftkiller on Sun, 28 May 2006 20:55
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Sun, 28 May 2006 22:17
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Aircraftkiller on Sun, 28 May 2006 22:44
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Mon, 29 May 2006 00:03
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PlastoJoe on Mon, 29 May 2006 08:54
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Aircraftkiller on Mon, 29 May 2006 10:19
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Kamuix on Mon, 29 May 2006 11:58
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Mortus Est on Mon, 29 May 2006 14:56
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Aircraftkiller on Mon, 29 May 2006 15:16
		Re: n00bjet-no By: MexPirate on Tue, 30 May 2006 05:42
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Goztow on Tue, 30 May 2006 05:45
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Wyld1USA on Sat, 03 June 2006 10:06
		Re: n00bjet-no By: OWA on Sat, 03 June 2006 10:25
		Re: n00bjet-no By: MexPirate on Tue, 30 May 2006 08:49
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mrpirate on Tue, 30 May 2006 10:46
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Dover on Tue, 30 May 2006 10:31
		Re: n00bjet-no By: MexPirate on Wed, 31 May 2006 05:35
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Aircraftkiller on Wed, 31 May 2006 06:52
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Spoony on Wed, 31 May 2006 07:48
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Aircraftkiller on Wed, 31 May 2006 08:33
		Re: n00bjet-no By: nukchebi0 on Fri, 02 June 2006 16:11
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Phazon87 on Sat, 10 June 2006 05:44
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Lijitsu on Sat, 10 June 2006 06:06
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Aircraftkiller on Sat, 10 June 2006 09:31
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Phazon87 on Sun, 11 June 2006 02:09
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Ma1kel on Sat, 10 June 2006 12:11
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Aircraftkiller on Sat, 10 June 2006 13:15
		Re: n00bjet-no By: OWA on Sat, 10 June 2006 16:08
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mrpirate on Sun, 11 June 2006 07:40
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Kamuix on Mon, 12 June 2006 04:12
		Re: n00bjet-no By: OWA on Mon, 12 June 2006 09:58
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mision08 on Sun, 11 June 2006 14:23
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Aircraftkiller on Sun, 11 June 2006 22:23
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Titan_HQ on Mon, 12 June 2006 13:29
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Mon, 12 June 2006 14:07
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Titan_HQ on Mon, 12 June 2006 23:45
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Tue, 13 June 2006 02:07
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Lijitsu on Tue, 13 June 2006 02:13
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Tue, 13 June 2006 02:53
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Aircraftkiller on Tue, 13 June 2006 11:07
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sensitive on Tue, 13 June 2006 11:43
		Re: n00bjet-no By: OWA on Tue, 13 June 2006 12:38
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PlastoJoe on Tue, 13 June 2006 14:57
		Re: n00bjet-no By: m1a1_abrams on Thu, 15 June 2006 05:18
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Thu, 15 June 2006 05:36
		Re: n00bjet-no By: m1a1_abrams on Thu, 15 June 2006 06:48
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Thu, 15 June 2006 07:37
		Re: n00bjet-no By: MexPirate on Thu, 15 June 2006 08:15
		Re: n00bjet-no By: m1a1_abrams on Thu, 15 June 2006 08:18
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Thu, 15 June 2006 11:40
		Re: n00bjet-no By: m1a1_abrams on Thu, 15 June 2006 13:23
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Thu, 15 June 2006 14:06
		Re: n00bjet-no By: MexPirate on Thu, 15 June 2006 13:50
		Re: n00bjet-no By: MexPirate on Thu, 15 June 2006 14:59
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mision08 on Thu, 15 June 2006 17:11
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Thu, 15 June 2006 15:29
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mrpirate on Thu, 15 June 2006 16:18
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Thu, 15 June 2006 17:39
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mision08 on Thu, 15 June 2006 18:46
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Aircraftkiller on Thu, 15 June 2006 22:22
		Re: n00bjet-no By: MexPirate on Fri, 16 June 2006 01:28
		Re: n00bjet-no By: OWA on Fri, 16 June 2006 03:16
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Fri, 16 June 2006 03:27
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mrpirate on Fri, 16 June 2006 04:58
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Fri, 16 June 2006 05:00
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mrpirate on Fri, 16 June 2006 14:56
		Re: n00bjet-no By: OWA on Fri, 16 June 2006 15:51
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Fri, 16 June 2006 17:06
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Kamuix on Wed, 19 July 2006 13:12
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Wed, 19 July 2006 15:44
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Berkut on Wed, 19 July 2006 21:08
		Re: n00bjet-no By: F15pilotXP on Mon, 24 July 2006 19:42
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Dover on Thu, 20 July 2006 08:43
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mision08 on Thu, 20 July 2006 14:20
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mrpirate on Thu, 20 July 2006 11:17
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Dover on Thu, 20 July 2006 11:21
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mrpirate on Thu, 20 July 2006 14:59
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Dover on Thu, 20 July 2006 22:04
		Re: n00bjet-no By: T0RN on Fri, 21 July 2006 10:43
		Re: n00bjet-no By: IronWarrior on Fri, 21 July 2006 16:05
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Fri, 21 July 2006 16:44
		Re: n00bjet-no By: PlastoJoe on Fri, 21 July 2006 18:47
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Sniper_De7 on Tue, 25 July 2006 04:36
		Re: n00bjet-no By: m1a1_abrams on Tue, 25 July 2006 07:42
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Wed, 26 July 2006 03:57
		Re: n00bjet-no By: mrpirate on Wed, 26 July 2006 15:37
		Re: n00bjet-no By: JohnDoe on Thu, 27 July 2006 01:02
		Re: n00bjet-no By: MexPirate on Thu, 27 July 2006 00:59
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Dover on Thu, 27 July 2006 23:08
		Re: n00bjet-no By: Feetseek on Sat, 29 July 2006 00:10

Previous Topic:	Here is a fun stratigy for GDI!
Next Topic:	Flying vehicle weapons

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Nov 25 15:02:13 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04075 seconds