Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » An Objective Look at Media Bias
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias [message #191801 is a reply to message #191662] |
Fri, 03 March 2006 21:24 |
|
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma:
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
NeoSaber wrote on Thu, 02 March 2006 17:27 |
SuperFlyingEngi wrote on Tue, 28 February 2006 16:56 | NeoSaber...
An organization being biased does not mean that they can conduct an unbiased survey.
|
I agree, an organization being biased doesn't mean they can be unbiased.
I assume you actually meant to write they "does not mean that they can't conduct an unbiased survey".
|
My mistake. Thanks for the correction.
Neosaber | To which I have to ask, then what was the point of the survey? If people who are biased can give us objective information, then who cares if there is a media bias? If there are more republicans than democrats on Sunday morning talk shows, what prevents them from being as objective in their analysis as you claim this group to be? The republican party is an organization, despite having certain views on issues, so they can be objective too.
|
The point isn't whether party affiliates can be objective, but whether they will be or not.
Neosaber | According to that, we don't even need to listen to democrats or progressives. Any republican or conservative can give us an unbiased, objective analysis of a situation. If an organization that represents a left/right bias of 100/0 can be objective, then certainly a media that offers a 40/60 bias can be objective as well. It doesn't matter if "Sunday is conservative", it can be just as objective if it was "Sunday is 50/50", or "Sunday is progressive".
|
Again, just because there is a possibility that a slanted guest representation on the media can still deliver perfect objectivity doesn't mean that it's a chance worth relying on. The odds of such a situation are very, very small. And since there is such a consistency of a major slant in guests, I'm thinking that objectivity and balance isn't what the media networks have in mind. At least on Sunday.
msgtpain: You do know I wasn't always so sour, right? Those comments are in reaction to the cursing and slander emanating from my opposition on this forum towards myself. I didn't bring polar politics here. But when I'm faced with it in such astounding amounts, what would you do? Should I avoid the term Republican, or accurately typecast the majority on these forums? You think I'd be happier without that? Sure I would. But few here are willing to budge from party politics, which is more than a bit upsetting. I typecast individuals as a result of slander. There is no other meaningful way to talk to those who have no other political vocabulary. But I still think that this quote is pretty funny:
SuperFlyingEngi | I saw the impossible today. A Republican Texas Represenative [Ron Paul] taking an anti-war stance on C-SPAN. Guess his mind drugs wore off.
|
And you, I can only assume, didn't look up who David Brock was (among other things)...
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
An Objective Look at Media Bias
|
|
|
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias
|
|
|
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias
By: Ryan3k on Sun, 26 February 2006 14:59
|
|
|
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias
By: runewood on Sun, 26 February 2006 15:10
|
|
|
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias
By: Crimson on Sun, 26 February 2006 16:21
|
|
|
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias
By: NeoSaber on Sun, 26 February 2006 18:11
|
|
|
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias
By: Jecht on Sun, 26 February 2006 19:40
|
|
|
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias
By: msgtpain on Sun, 26 February 2006 21:39
|
|
|
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias
|
|
|
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias
By: Jecht on Tue, 28 February 2006 05:43
|
|
|
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias
|
|
|
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias
By: msgtpain on Wed, 01 March 2006 20:18
|
|
|
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias
By: NeoSaber on Thu, 02 March 2006 15:27
|
|
|
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias
|
|
|
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias
By: NeoSaber on Sat, 04 March 2006 23:50
|
|
|
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias
|
|
|
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias
|
|
|
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias
By: msgtpain on Thu, 02 March 2006 07:57
|
|
|
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias
|
|
|
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias
By: msgtpain on Thu, 02 March 2006 20:11
|
|
|
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias
|
|
|
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias
By: NukeIt15 on Thu, 02 March 2006 21:45
|
|
|
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias
|
|
|
Re: An Objective Look at Media Bias
By: NeoSaber on Sun, 05 March 2006 14:22
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu Nov 28 09:07:39 MST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00922 seconds
|