Command and Conquer: Renegade Official Forums: General Discussion » BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion

Home » General Discussions » General Discussion » BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion (

) 4 Votes

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion [message #171346 is a reply to message #170466]

Mon, 12 September 2005 15:49

Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Karma:

General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR

Wow... "Hypocrit" has had a brilliant revelation. Apparently, get this, n00bstories is not always helpful to newcomers. Wow. Who would have THUNK it? A site dedicated to MAKING FUN OF N00BS sometimes bashes idiots. That is, wow, amazing. I learned something new today. Wow... who would have imagined that a community based on making fun of idiots makes fun of idiots.

The idiocy we're seeing here is relating BHS to n00bstories.

Let's look at the BHS team, shall we?
mac - Director of BHS, lead of RenGuard, not a member or participant in n00bstories.
Blazer - Director of BHS, heavily involved in n00bstories (and oh yeah, he's my boyfriend)
Crimson - Director of BHS, owner of n00bstories

Scorpio9a - At one point helped with some of the coding of n00bstories, no longer involved.
jonwil - Never involved with n00bstories
v00d00 - Never involved with n00bstories
Silent_Kane - operator in #n00bstories IRC, other than that not involved with n00bstories
Laeubi, Minax - never involved with n00bstories
zunnie - never involved with n00bstories

So, let's see, between BHS and n00bstories we have two members who overlap in both, then we have one director not involved, 5 people never associated as staff for n00bstories, 1 person involved for a short time in the past, and 1 person who has a relatively small staff role.

So yeah, I can see why you'd think n00bstories and BHS are one and the same. I mean, 2 out of 10 members are n00bstories staff!

I'm the bawss.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Blazer on Sat, 10 September 2005 01:57
		Re: Open Appeal to Adad from Blackhand Studios By: Xtrm2Matt on Sat, 10 September 2005 02:25
		Re: Open Appeal to Adad from Blackhand Studios By: YSLMuffins on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:00
		Re: Open Appeal to Adad from Blackhand Studios By: Xtrm2Matt on Sun, 11 September 2005 02:54
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sat, 10 September 2005 02:53
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Ma1kel on Sat, 10 September 2005 05:20
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: greb on Sat, 10 September 2005 10:40
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sat, 10 September 2005 12:41
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Nightma12 on Sat, 10 September 2005 14:37
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: cmatt42 on Sat, 10 September 2005 11:03
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: xptek on Sat, 10 September 2005 14:22
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: mac on Sat, 10 September 2005 14:58
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Parad0x on Sat, 10 September 2005 16:20
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Nightma12 on Sat, 10 September 2005 15:02
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sat, 10 September 2005 20:57
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: snipgod on Sat, 10 September 2005 20:59
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:05
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: snipgod on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:11
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:12
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:13
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: snipgod on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:15
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:17
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:19
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: snipgod on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:21
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:22
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:24
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: DarkDemin on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:24
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: mac on Sun, 11 September 2005 09:34
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Aircraftkiller on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:41
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:42
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: DarkDemin on Sat, 10 September 2005 21:48
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sat, 10 September 2005 22:01
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: grnfusion on Sat, 10 September 2005 22:40
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sat, 10 September 2005 22:41
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: grnfusion on Sat, 10 September 2005 22:47
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sat, 10 September 2005 22:51
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: =HT=T-Bird on Sun, 11 September 2005 07:33
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sun, 11 September 2005 09:51
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: mac on Sun, 11 September 2005 09:57
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: NukeIt15 on Sun, 11 September 2005 10:28
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sun, 11 September 2005 11:37
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: msgtpain on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:05
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: mac on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:08
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:11
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: cmatt42 on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:14
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:23
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Dave Mason on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:25
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:34
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Jecht on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:36
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ben5015se on Sun, 11 September 2005 12:37
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: luv2pb on Sun, 11 September 2005 14:49
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Jecht on Sun, 11 September 2005 14:50
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Jecht on Mon, 12 September 2005 11:40
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Sun, 11 September 2005 17:06
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: =HT=T-Bird on Sun, 11 September 2005 17:24
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Blazer on Sun, 11 September 2005 19:49
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: =HT=T-Bird on Mon, 12 September 2005 05:12
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Weirdo on Sun, 11 September 2005 23:54
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: light on Mon, 12 September 2005 03:19
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Belski on Mon, 12 September 2005 04:26
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: luv2pb on Mon, 12 September 2005 10:20
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Spoony_old on Mon, 12 September 2005 13:20
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: luv2pb on Mon, 12 September 2005 14:49
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Spoony_old on Tue, 13 September 2005 00:36
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: cmatt42 on Mon, 12 September 2005 13:18
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: spreegem on Mon, 12 September 2005 14:54
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:04
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:07
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: warranto on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:13
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Jecht on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:23
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Dave Mason on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:09
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:10
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:25
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: warranto on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:29
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:26
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:28
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Renx on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:28
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:29
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:38
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:38
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:38
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:40
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:43
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:45
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:47
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:57
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:49
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:51
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:53
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:57
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 15:59
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Mon, 12 September 2005 16:03
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 16:08
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 16:12
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 16:22
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 16:32
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 16:39
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:06
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:10
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Kanezor on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:12
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:14
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:16
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:24
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Chronojam on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:26
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:28
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Hypocrits on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:42
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:43
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: warranto on Mon, 12 September 2005 17:54
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ssptweek on Tue, 13 September 2005 01:48
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Tue, 13 September 2005 03:14
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Belski on Tue, 13 September 2005 04:30
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ssptweek on Tue, 13 September 2005 12:03
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: dead6re on Tue, 13 September 2005 12:58
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Tue, 13 September 2005 06:22
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: mac on Tue, 13 September 2005 07:34
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: ssptweek on Tue, 13 September 2005 13:41
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Aircraftkiller on Tue, 13 September 2005 13:56
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: luv2pb on Tue, 13 September 2005 14:38
		Re: BHS "has proven themselves in the past" Discussion By: Crimson on Tue, 13 September 2005 17:32

Previous Topic:	ATTENTION
Next Topic:	best hoting ever

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Dec 03 00:17:25 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02085 seconds