Re: New Energy Bill - Relief? [message #164995 is a reply to message #164942] |
Mon, 01 August 2005 11:16 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/theme/Renegade_Forums/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to previous message](/theme/Renegade_Forums/images/down.png) |
![](http://renegadeforums.com/images/custom_avatars/1779.jpg) |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma:
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
msgtpain wrote on Sun, 31 July 2005 19:43 | who's determination of "need" are we supposed to be bowing to, environmentalists? Your opinion of need may be completely different from mine.
|
Well, what's yours?
And, you know, the U.S. throws away money at such incredible speed compared to the rest of the world on gasoline that if we, say doubled fuel efficieny, even this crappy economy we have now would skyrocket.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|