Re: Have you noticed this? [message #162066 is a reply to message #162061] |
Tue, 28 June 2005 23:30 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/theme/Renegade_Forums/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to previous message](/theme/Renegade_Forums/images/down.png) |
![](http://renegadeforums.com/images/custom_avatars/19461.gif) |
Lijitsu
Messages: 1575 Registered: April 2005 Location: Georgia, USA
Karma:
|
General (1 Star) |
![Drow38](/theme/Renegade_Forums/images/yahoo.png)
|
|
deadfive wrote on Wed, 29 June 2005 02:07 | Take Doom 3 for example. I have all the settings on low because I only have 256MB of Ram and a ATI Radeon 9200 SE PCI. The graphics still look outstanding. Compared to Renegade, with all the graphics on low, it is butt ugly. The difference? As Icedog said, the game engines. ID had implemented a brand new 3d game engine into the game. I do not know what engine Renegade is using, but I am sure it is lightyears away from the game engine ID used for Doom 3.
|
Did you ever think that it might also have something to do with the fact that, oh i dont know, RENEGADE IS OVER THREE YEARS OLD AND DOOM 3 WAS MADE LAST YEAR!?!
Quote: | Unreal Tournament 2003 on lowest details looks worse than Doom 2
|
Yeah, but Doom 2 doesnt have "Graphics Settings" on it, plus its a really good game anyway. Hell, ive had games that the Game play distracted me from the poor Graphics. Example: Oni, PS2. Doom 1. Doom 2. Half-Life. Empire Earth(Zoom in on the people). Generals.
Just kidding about Half-Life, ive never played it.
![http://img235.imageshack.us/img235/6192/campfiresigred7rb.png](http://img235.imageshack.us/img235/6192/campfiresigred7rb.png)
![http://img74.imageshack.us/img74/2544/hmminiinferno9sb.jpg](http://img74.imageshack.us/img74/2544/hmminiinferno9sb.jpg)
Aircraftkiller wrote on Wed, 31 May 2006 22:30 | I've been Nodbuggered. =( =( =(
|
|
|
|