| Re: How fair is the media? [message #160137 is a reply to message #160027] |
Wed, 15 June 2005 21:20   |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma:
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
UPDATE
Already, the Schiavo autopsy release has moved to story #11 on FOXNews' site, after
1) Australian Hostage Released
2) Home Investigated
3) Pushing Privacy
4) Senate Holds Gitmo Hearing
5) Ariz. Harrier Crash Forces 1,300 to Evacuate
6) Courthouse Shootings Hostage Writing Book
7) Parents to Blame for Girl's Cancer, Doctor Says
 Discovery Back at Launch Pad
9) Opening Statements Heard in '64 Civil Rights Murders Trial
10) Official: Chemical Plant Protections Inadequate
11) Schiavo Autopsy Released
It's already the thirid headline on CNN, after
1) Real-life brothers in arms
2) Was race a factor in Aruba arrests?
3) Autopsy: No sign Schiavo was abused
It's already the 7th headling on MSNBC, after
1) Iraqi commander describes dramatic hostage rescue
2) Senators clash on Gitmo prisoners
3) Aruba teen suspect’s home searched
4) Michael ‘at peace,’ Jermaine says
5) House curtails Patriot Act provision | Vote
6) Cancer-stricken girl’s mom has change of heart
7) Schiavo autopsy backs husband | Video
Is the mainstream media still fair after it tries to cover up for loudmouth Republicans?
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
