Re: How fair is the media? [message #160086 is a reply to message #160027] |
Wed, 15 June 2005 15:56 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4c00/d4c00c5bc5e1339668eda9f53e4e3eeb6f57a9d6" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fa4c/4fa4c45c77288328f54dbc1905282e765682314e" alt="Go to next message Go to previous message" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ba97/9ba978375d930553588e21949300738f55d8abdb" alt="" |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma:
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Because about 5 FOX readers were actually interested in reading about the autopsy. They know their readers aren't going to try to educate themselves, so they can do that all they want. I bet tomorrow there will be almost nothing, if not nothing] linking to the Schiavo autopsy.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|