Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » The WMD and terrorist ties that didn't exist...or did they?
The WMD and terrorist ties that didn't exist...or did they? [message #119315] Sat, 09 October 2004 18:26 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
warranto is currently offline  warranto
Messages: 2584
Registered: February 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Karma:
General (2 Stars)
hydra1945

Everything in your last post; just to save space


Only one thing wrong with the first part. International Law was broken. If you search, you can find mulitple threads where this was proven.

In the event that the reason of America enforing the law, that as well is just as bad. Regardless of the UNs inaction, it is not up to America to produce the world.

As for the stuff thats "not like me", I'm well aware of that, but I was trying to prove a point, and through those other threads that I mentioned above, this type of posting was a last resort in explaining it.

The point I was tring to make is that future action, because they are not known, can not be used to explain the actions of someone. The ONLY way that something can be acted on before the act occurs is if actions are taken by the suspected to ensure the act is completed. According to the UN, Iraq was, albeit slowely, getting rid of the weapons it was told to get rid of.

In the event that what Blazer posted was true, until they actually made attempts to follow through with those acts, (ex. Building up its weapons again) nothing could 'legally' be done. Anything prior to that is conspiracy, and is a lesser charge.

In keeping with this out-of-character point, that definition of a threat, and it involving China, Israel, Canada, in fact every nation in the world could be a potential threat. This is exactly the point I was trying to make about future actions not being able to be considered. It turns into ludicrous reasoning such as this.

Anf that "You being in charge comment" was a bit out of line, but I was getting frusterated in trying to get my point across. I appologise.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Canadian News: Lol, not again.
Next Topic: WTF ... Prison is supposed to be PUNISHMENT
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Sep 10 01:28:07 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01517 seconds