| Vice Presidential Debate [message #118575] |
Wed, 06 October 2004 03:27   |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma:
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| Nodbugger |
Cheney answered the question by actually saying what will fix it, not making up some plan that will will never be explained.
|
I don't think you know what you're talking about at all. You said this about the first debate, and it made no sense. You said it about this debate, and it doesn't make much sense, either. How did Cheney explain his plans while Edwards did not?
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
