These crappy debates... [message #116840] |
Mon, 27 September 2004 12:22 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/theme/Renegade_Forums/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to previous message](/theme/Renegade_Forums/images/down.png) |
![](http://renegadeforums.com/images/custom_avatars/1779.jpg) |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma:
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
liberator | I mean the way the Lefties(dems, commies, ect) have successfully divided the country, it seems like we're on the verge of civil war sometimes.
|
How have liberals been dividing the country? Or is that just your FOX-brand force-fed opinion of the day? An *actual* way Republicans divide the country is through their many wedge issues like gay marriage.
Moving on, NHJ, from what I've heard the debates now have a 32-page rulebook, with debaters not being allowed to address each other, and just taking questions from the audience that have to be ratified by the director. It's just a system for George Bush to be able to recite his talking points by never taking any hardball questions.
Well, we'll see how the debates go, but they're not going to be what they used to be.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|