Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » The Ultimate Iraq War thread
The Ultimate Iraq War thread [message #112171] Tue, 31 August 2004 05:27 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
ViperFUD is currently offline  ViperFUD
Messages: 69
Registered: April 2003
Karma:
Recruit
Nodbugger

Never was Iraq's severity taken away. They were always 'self governed' and never did the US take that away from them. We simply changed their leader. Which is no way violating that. Iraq is still Iraq and it will now be run by the Iraqi people. We in no way took away their sovereignty.

Hold on. I just want to quote two specific parts of this again, cause I'm laughing so damn hard.

Nodbugger


... never did the US take [their sovereignty] away from them.
We simply changed their leader.



I'm going to put this very simply for you, cause you seem to have difficulty understanding.

The definition of sovereignty, according to Merriam-Webster, definistion 2a is:
The Mother-Fuckin Dictionary

2a. supreme power especially over a body politic


By changing who ran their government (read:"body politic") we took away their supreme power over it.

By definition, we took AWAY THEIR SOVEREIGNTY.



Nodbugger

I am not evil for not caring if an evil person died. I would not care if Saddam died or if Osama dies. I wouldn't have cared when Hitler died or when Stalin died. They were all evil people that made the world a worse place to live. There is no reason not to kill them.


I totally agree. However, there is a right way and a wrong way to do things. Doing the right things in the wrong way (do I sound like a broken record) is still WRONG.


Nodbugger

About the Iranian mother. If she lived there for twenty years, I'm assuming she was born there then yes she is brainwashed. Iran has a closed media and they brainwash people from the beginning. She has passed that on to you. Take some asshole out of the anti-bush protests in New York and set them down in Iran and they will never say the same things about the US as they were not so long ago. Same with China, Saddam's Iraq, North Korea, Cuba and the countless other shit holes that you fuck tards want to stay.


Ahh, but you get upset when SuperFlyingLiberal (sorry, I just think that's a cool nick for ya) says you're brainwashed by Fox News. If the Iranian media is capable of brainwashing people, isn't the American media, also?

Or do you just think you're the only one in the world who sees the truth?


Nodbugger


ViperFud, you are the biggest retard ever.

Really? More on this later ....


Nodbugger

And no New Yorkers never said that. I can show you a video of them saying the complete opposite. They are all pissed at the protesters taking up tax money and all their security forces. Plus all the streets they are taking up.

And now you call me a liar.

It was on the news; and in fact, as I stated before, Fox News.

I think you've been brainwashed.



Nodbugger

No I never said it is legal f you don't get caught. No where ever have I said that.


Oh really? Let's look at that:
Nodbugger

OF COURSE IT MEANS IT IS LEGAL! I cop doesn't pull you over to tell you that you are abiding the law.

Looks to me like you said there that, even if you were speeding, it's only illegal if you get pulled over.

It's your fucking words bitch. You said them; and now you can't take them back.


Nodbugger

You analogy doesn't work dumb ass. Why the fuck would you be pressing charges if I was the one killed? It doesn't work to begin with because it isn't even a similar situation. You are just pulling shit out of your ass.


Actually, my analogy works perfectly well. See, anyone who witnesses (or knows about) a murder can go to the police. Just because I don't,l does that make it legal?

Nice tactic, by the way; rather than answer the questions that prove you wrong, you avoid them altogether. But it doesn't fool anyone else; we all know you're a dumbshit anyway.


Nodbugger

Bush never said we are returning Sovereignty to Iraq. He said something that your little mind may have turned into that. Because all of you are so fucking stupid you cannot even understand what someone says, the funny part is you all call him an idiot yes you cannot understand what he says.

From CNN.com
CNN.com


... the newly sovereign nation now belongs to the people of Iraq ...
... Along with the transfer of sovereignty, the interim government ...



Now, how can they be "newly" sovereign if they always were? And how can we transfer it back to them if we never took it in the first place?

And in case you won't accept CNN news, here's some stuf from FOXNews.com:
President Bush


On June the 30th, full sovereignty will be transferred to the interim government.



So apparently, he DID say we were returning it.

What now, bitch?


Nodbugger

BTW Java you keep contradicting yourself with that is garble you keep posting.


"Hey Sun; this is the pot. You're black." See, I couldn't say "pot" and "kettle," cause java isn't doing the shit you're accusing him of. But you sure as fuck are.

Nodbugger

If the UN isn't taking away our sovereignty by taking away what we can and can't do how come we are taking away Iraq's sovereignty?


We voluntarily surrendered some of our rights when we joined the UN; nothing was "taken away." Iraq didn't ASK us to invade (and it woulda been a LOT better if they had) we just went in. Completely different story.


Now. As I promised, we'll get back to your comment about our relative intellects.

I am smarter than you. And now I will prove it. I am posting two questions from tests for one of the classes I took at MIT. The first one I got right; the second I got wrong. If you can answer both correctly, then you can say you're smarter than me. If not, then shut the fuck up.

the first question, which is so easy that it shouldn't even really be considered a challenge:
Let {x_n} be a sequence of positive real numbers such that (x_n)^3 > n. Show that
1/x_n −► 0 as n −► ∞ with respect to the usual metric on R.



And the second, which is decently harder:
Consider the function α : [0, 1] −► R defined by

            ½x          0 ≤ x ≤ ½
α(x) = {
            ½(x + 1)    ½ ≤ x ≤1

Show carefully, using results from class, that any monotonic increasing function
f : [0, 1] −► R which is continuous at x = ½ is Riemann-Stieltjes integrable with respect to α.


Good luck, bitch.

~ViperFUD

And shepherds we shall be,
For thee, my Lord, for thee.
Power hath descended forth from thy hand;
That our feet may swiftly carry out thy command.
And we shall flow a river forth to thee,
And teeming with souls shall it ever be.

[Updated on: Tue, 31 August 2004 09:45]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: HAHAHA
Next Topic: URL Hijacking
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Nov 13 05:33:05 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01182 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 420.69.
Copyright ©2001-2023 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software