|
|
| Question.. [message #99846] |
Tue, 06 July 2004 07:07   |
spoonyrat
Messages: 406
Registered: December 2003
Location: England
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
|
and when did I re-create CE? Oh yeah, 2 days ago :rolleyes: Where was LT before I killed it? Oh yeah, 1st, and I was 1st in the warrior rankings too
|
|
|
|
| Question.. [message #99849] |
Tue, 06 July 2004 07:12 |
KIRBY098
Messages: 1546
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Sigh, all the good clans are gone now.............
Remember the good old days when clan warfare was hot for Renegade?
Hard to beleive this is all that's left...
Deleted
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Question.. [message #99854] |
Tue, 06 July 2004 07:39 |
spoonyrat
Messages: 406
Registered: December 2003
Location: England
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
|
It's true there aren't many competitive clans any more, but the best clans now would probably surprise you. I highly doubt a team outside CW could beat +B.R+, +FE+, Fizzle or -*CE*-
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Question.. [message #99881] |
Tue, 06 July 2004 09:11 |
spoonyrat
Messages: 406
Registered: December 2003
Location: England
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
|
I would've liked to have been around at that time to play them, actually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Question.. [message #99942] |
Tue, 06 July 2004 14:23 |
mahkra
Messages: 219
Registered: April 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| spoonyrat |
You're speaking as if you actually said "CEspoony, infantry only!" And I said "No." That wasn't the case though, was it? Forgive me if I'm not telepathic. I wonder if I joined halfway and myself with nothing but, say, the airstrip left and no money. Would I say "Don't kill it! Shotgun fight only!" No, I'd actually let you kill it so we could get another game going.
|
That's the whole point though. I didn't want to "get another game going." In my opinion, killing bases 1v1 is a boring waste of time. I'd rather be playing minesweeper than killing someone's base 1v1.
I wanted to just have infantry wars until more people joined. And I DID actually tell you that. You didn't say "no," but you did ignore me and continue to use your arty. (Maybe you ignored me because you didn't know I was the host, but ignorance is no excuse.)
meh... I've already explained all this to you once, and you didn't understand it then, so I'm probably just wasting my time trying to explain it again.
|
|
|
|
| Question.. [message #99950] |
Tue, 06 July 2004 14:57 |
spoonyrat
Messages: 406
Registered: December 2003
Location: England
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
| mahkra |
I wanted to just have infantry wars until more people joined. And I DID actually tell you that.
|
Try f2 next time smart guy :rolleyes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Question.. [message #99957] |
Tue, 06 July 2004 15:12 |
mahkra
Messages: 219
Registered: April 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| spoonyrat |
| mahkra |
I wanted to just have infantry wars until more people joined. And I DID actually tell you that.
|
Try f2 next time smart guy :rolleyes:
|
Actually, "smart guy," I remapped the chat commands to enter and backspace. I don't use F2 or F3 or whatever they originally were. And in addition to saying things on all-chat, I paged you and told you to stop. It's not my fault if you weren't paying attention.
|
|
|
|
| Question.. [message #99959] |
Tue, 06 July 2004 15:19 |
spoonyrat
Messages: 406
Registered: December 2003
Location: England
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
|
Do you mind if we discuss things which ACTUALLY HAPPENED? :rolleyes:
|
|
|
|
| Question.. [message #99981] |
Tue, 06 July 2004 18:04 |
mahkra
Messages: 219
Registered: April 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| spoonyrat |
Do you mind if we discuss things which ACTUALLY HAPPENED? :rolleyes:
|
Actually, yes, I do mind. I've already discussed them with you twice, which is two times to many. You're a stupid fuck who isn't worth my time, so I'm done talking to you. Say whatever you want about the time I banned you. It won't change the facts. And it won't make me care.
|
|
|
|
| Question.. [message #99986] |
Tue, 06 July 2004 18:34 |
spoonyrat
Messages: 406
Registered: December 2003
Location: England
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
|
If you're so indifferent, why feel the need to lie about it to validate your arguments? It's also ironic how you call me a "stupid fuck" and that you "don't care" at the end of an argument you've clearly lost :rolleyes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Question.. [message #100217] |
Wed, 07 July 2004 12:46 |
KIRBY098
Messages: 1546
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| snipesimo |
| Umbral_DelaFlare |
Ah, the good ol' days of -WL- and DOM.
DOM by far was the largest Renegade clan ever. Too bad it disbanded when Trey died. 
|
Its a shame you don't realize that DG is still around. Its also a shame that you don't realize the EoE (which is made up of many former DOM members) has far surpassed the Dom-Guild member count.
|
It's a shame they aren't top ranked.
Deleted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Question.. [message #100313] |
Wed, 07 July 2004 22:36 |
spoonyrat
Messages: 406
Registered: December 2003
Location: England
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
| Javaxcx |
| spoonyrat |
If you're so indifferent, why feel the need to lie about it to validate your arguments? It's also ironic how you call me a "stupid fuck" and that you "don't care" at the end of an argument you've clearly lost :rolleyes:
|
I don't understand how you draw that conclusion. It's your word against his. Furthermore, where is the irony? Do you even know why irony is?
Again, your logic is flawed.
|
Can't help but notice you and Mahkra have a rather similar method of avoiding the fact you're totally wrong about something
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Question.. [message #100385] |
Thu, 08 July 2004 09:07 |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Because there were 5 pages of stuff to talk about.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
