|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should we fix jumping on barracks on Canyon? [message #98315] |
Wed, 30 June 2004 09:24   |
flyingfox
Messages: 1612
Registered: February 2003
Location: scotland, uk
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
From what I understand the level author intended the signboard to have an infantry blocker but forgot to add it in or something. I've used it to beacon before but it's unarguably an exploit and therefore needs to be fixed. The only people who would argue not to fix it would be people used to doing it, which are invalid points because they're only used to doing something which is already an exploit. It's the same thing like wall jumping, people argue not to fix walljumping because they are used to using it and errorneously consider it a tactic.
If the author of any level didn't intend for something to be done, then it sohuldn't be done, regardless of how many people think it's valid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should we fix jumping on barracks on Canyon? [message #98354] |
Wed, 30 June 2004 11:36 |
[HLOW]Tomten
Messages: 164
Registered: May 2003
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
| Blazer |
I would be fine with it being fixed, although I like to get on the barracks roof with a mobius...great for fending off Flame Tanks.
More importantly, we should fix the exploit that allows anyone to jump onto the WF roof from the bridge on that same map. Beacons planted there are all but impossible to find in time, I know some people who plant them there regularly and they *always* go off.
|
I agree, fix the WF and leave barracks alone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
28 / 44%
