| Question for ACK [message #95820] |
Thu, 17 June 2004 14:46  |
spoonyrat
Messages: 406
Registered: December 2003
Location: England
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
Re: the limited ammo for orca and apache
If there was an orca vs apache fight and no other units were involved, would either of them actually have enough ammo to kill the other?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Question for ACK [message #95989] |
Fri, 18 June 2004 11:08  |
|
|
OMGWTF LE HARTEY HAS LE BAD NAMEE?!!?!?
I suck cock and love it... absolutely love it. And I just got banned for being too immature to be allowed to post here.
|
|
|
|
| Question for ACK [message #95995] |
Fri, 18 June 2004 11:47 |
spoonyrat
Messages: 406
Registered: December 2003
Location: England
Karma: 0
|
Commander |
|
|
|
Yes, as a pointwhore tool that's only good for shooting buildings to rack up MVP, instead of the awesome anti-tank and anti-infantry weapon it actually is
|
|
|
|
| Question for ACK [message #95998] |
Fri, 18 June 2004 11:56 |
 |
smwScott
Messages: 225
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
The artillery is primarily used for attacking structures, there are better anti-unit alternatives. Attacking a structure is not point whoring, it's winning. I've destroyed quite a few structures from the top of the hill on hourglass, simply because the enemy didn't realize it until it was too late. However, if I realize that it is impossible to destroy because there are too many engineers repairing it then I leave, because it's boring. However, I admire the people who keep shooting it. They are gaining points for the team and keeping at least on person totally occupied, which is an advantage for your team, even if they think they're doing it for themselves.
-smwScott
47% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
