Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » Archived Forums » Core Patches » Should the maps we are making available be optional or not?
Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #91948] Wed, 02 June 2004 18:05 Go to next message
jonwil is currently offline  jonwil
Messages: 3557
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)


Should the maps go into core patch 1?[ 58 votes ]
1. The maps should go into core patch 1 45 / 78%
2. The maps should be an optional download 13 / 22%

Blackhand Studios is hard at work on Core Patch 1.
Core patch 1 is going to include several new maps (as of now, they are going to be (C&C_Mutation,C&C_Siege,C&C_FieldTS,C&C_Snow,C&C_Gobi,C&C_Sand).
More maps will be added in the future.

However, some team members have suggested that we should make the map downloads optional to be more kind to dialup users.

The downside to this is that it would likely result in far less people downloading the maps (which then means server owners are less likely to run the maps and etc).

So,we want to find out what you, the Renegade Community think.
Post here in this poll if you think the maps should be optional downloads or included in core patch 1 itself.

Another thing to bear in mind is that optional downloads would require extra functionality in the downloader to let you select which, if any, to download which means the downloader thingo would take more time to code.

I personally think they should be in core patch 1 itself (some team members aggree with me, some dont). The results of this poll will determine what Blackhand Studios does on this issue.

If you say "put them into core patch 1", all maps will be downloaded as part of the core patches.
if you say "make them optional", then maps will be made optional and only fixes and such will be in the patches.


Jonathan Wilson aka Jonwil
Creator and Lead Coder of the Custom scripts.dll
Renegade Engine Guru
Creator and Lead Coder of TT.DLL
Official member of Tiberian Technologies
Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #91978] Wed, 02 June 2004 19:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
npsmith82 is currently offline  npsmith82
Messages: 525
Registered: February 2003
Location: England, UK
Karma: 0
Colonel
"The maps should go into core patch 1"

I'm a "56k" dialup user that usually connects @ 31.2kbps, and i believe you should put the maps as a required download to RenGuard users. These maps you suggest, in total will come to roughly 20MB, which to be honest, is no biggie for anyone (2 hours of downloading).

I've absolutely no problem with downloading 20MB every now and then for new maps, but i must insist that you make the download resumeable with plenty of mirrors.

Go for it, i wanna play some new maps with plenty of people alongside me!


WOL: npsmith82

For RenAutoComplete, RenSkirmish, RenBuddyList and RenWOLstatus please visit (IE) TheCodeSmith.com
Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #91983] Wed, 02 June 2004 19:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Creed3020 is currently offline  Creed3020
Messages: 1438
Registered: February 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
This is a definate yes. It is important to make sure that this is downloaded just as if it were an actual patch from WW.
Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #91986] Wed, 02 June 2004 19:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Majiin Vegeta is currently offline  Majiin Vegeta
Messages: 2186
Registered: February 2003
Location: London
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
ouch npsmith still on the 56k Sad



is it possible to get RG to check if they already have that map.. somepeople might be redownloading maps they already have

i voted for required thingy
Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #91996] Wed, 02 June 2004 19:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
gibberish
Messages: 366
Registered: May 2003
Karma: 0
Commander
What else is currently scheduled to go into core patch 1 ?
Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #91998] Wed, 02 June 2004 19:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
YSLMuffins is currently offline  YSLMuffins
Messages: 1144
Registered: February 2003
Location: Moved a long time ago (it...
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Moderator - Mod Forum
All those maps together can't possibly amount to less than 20 megs...

I think it all just comes down to how much that needs to be downloaded. Like npsmith said, 20 megs seems reasonable. 30 pushes it, but I'm up for integrated maps within the patches. Best way imo to get maps to the players.

And edit: this should be on the general forum.


-YSLMuffins
The goddess of all (bread products)
See me online as yslcheeze
Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #91999] Wed, 02 June 2004 19:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
xptek_disabled is currently offline  xptek_disabled
Messages: 1308
Registered: September 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Core patch, I want to run them on my server.

Local oper-irc.ugin.net - A Scrumfy free IRC.
Jonwil > SK
http://www.byterush.net/
Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #92001] Wed, 02 June 2004 19:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Renx is currently offline  Renx
Messages: 2321
Registered: April 2003
Location: Canada
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
Category Moderator
Instead of taking them away from the patch completely, could you put 2 options up before you install? One you could check off "install core updates" and another you could check off "install maps", or something like that....?

~Canucck

http://www.sloganizer.net/en/style7,Espion.png

Blazer

...RG made me ugly
Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #92023] Wed, 02 June 2004 20:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Crimson is currently offline  Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR
That what optional means. Razz

I'm the bawss.
Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #92025] Wed, 02 June 2004 20:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jonwil is currently offline  jonwil
Messages: 3557
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)

Rest assured that whatever download client we make will be as good as we can make it.

And we are going to be mindfull of how large the core patch ends up being, we may pull one or more of the maps if we decide its too large.

I am going to look into doing the download client myself (Slient_Kane was going to do it but he seems to have done nothing on it as yet)

The plan is this:
If you have core patches turned on, the server checks your current core patch version, if its not the latest, it sends a command (much like the renguard auto-update command) to download & run a small exe.
This small exe will check your core patch version.
If it is "no core patch", it will download an "all-in-one" patch that contains everything needed to go up to the latest.
Otherwise it will download, in order, a set of patches.
If you are at patch 3 and patch 5 is the latest, it updates from 3 to 4 then from 4 to 5.
The patches themselves will be RTPatch patches (same as what Renegade and I think RenAlert uses) amd will probobly use the same patchw32.dll file that comes with Renegade itself.

There will be (hopefully) download resume support for this to enable the download to start from where it left off if there is a network dropout or a program crash or a power falure or whatever (or even if you just want to cancel it and resume later)


Jonathan Wilson aka Jonwil
Creator and Lead Coder of the Custom scripts.dll
Renegade Engine Guru
Creator and Lead Coder of TT.DLL
Official member of Tiberian Technologies
Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #92085] Thu, 03 June 2004 04:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Phoenix - Aeon is currently offline  Phoenix - Aeon
Messages: 221
Registered: April 2004
Karma: 0
Recruit
How about setting up each map as an individual update, that way you can let them all run at once or interupt half way through if needed and still have some of the maps.
Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #92086] Thu, 03 June 2004 05:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deactivated is currently offline  Deactivated
Messages: 1503
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Just a question, is it possible to release the exe patch as seperate download so they can be used in mods with their own copy of the game exe?
Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #92097] Thu, 03 June 2004 05:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
OnfireUK is currently offline  OnfireUK
Messages: 144
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
Recruit
How about having a core patch 1 with everything included, and then in tiny writing (so that hardly anyone can see it) a core patch 1 without the maps hehehe

Moderator @ Dethserv2: Moonlightshakers
WOL Nick : PHxOnfire
"Oh mortal man, is there anything you cannot be made to believe?" - Adam Weishaupt
"Sapere Aude- Dare to be wise"
Http://www.hyousaf.plus.com/WinDoze.gif
Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #92099] Thu, 03 June 2004 06:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Sir Kane
Messages: 1701
Registered: March 2003
Location: Angerville
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Forcing people to download stuff = bad.

Proud N9500 and proud N6270 user. Creator of the IEE libraries (original bhs.dll) and the RB series software.
http://n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1189992501http://www.n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1257492907
Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #92179] Thu, 03 June 2004 10:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
JPNOD is currently offline  JPNOD
Messages: 807
Registered: April 2004
Location: Area 51
Karma: 0
Colonel
I have got a couple of questions.
Before ile download a corepatch will there be a readme in it of what is fixed?
and whats in it?
I think u guys should just put the maps in corepatch, as long as the maps are well tested and are fair, for both sides to play.
Patching sounds like sbhs, dieing obelisks charging, bugs ecta is great and awsome Very Happy Very Happy .
But plz dont change the game like it is. i know it sucks to fly a orca and get n00bjetted down in 3 sec but thats the game that im used to and. when playing a server with about 10 people, u can fly a orca/apahc all the way without many sak/havo.

I voted yes since new maps are cool to play Smile
Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #92182] Thu, 03 June 2004 11:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mac is currently offline  mac
Messages: 1018
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Administrator/General
Yes, there will be a readme for everything that has changed.

No game changes are planned at this stage.

JP

I have got a couple of questions.
Before ile download a corepatch will there be a readme in it of what is fixed?
and whats in it?
I think u guys should just put the maps in corepatch, as long as the maps are well tested and are fair, for both sides to play.
Patching sounds like sbhs, dieing obelisks charging, bugs ecta is great and awsome Very Happy Very Happy .
But plz dont change the game like it is. i know it sucks to fly a orca and get n00bjetted down in 3 sec but thats the game that im used to and. when playing a server with about 10 people, u can fly a orca/apahc all the way without many sak/havo.

I voted yes since new maps are cool to play Smile


Quote:


danpaul88: buggy bugs brenbot because buggy befriends brainlessness

Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #92186] Thu, 03 June 2004 11:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
JPNOD is currently offline  JPNOD
Messages: 807
Registered: April 2004
Location: Area 51
Karma: 0
Colonel
Okey thanks ile turn core updates on now,i used to have it on but was a bit unsure about any real game changes like faster mammy, ore mods in a map Confused .

Thanks for all the effort u guys putted in this Rg, and patching this game.
Keep up the good work Surprised Smile
Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #92407] Fri, 04 June 2004 02:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Phil162 is currently offline  Phil162
Messages: 23
Registered: May 2004
Karma: 0
Recruit
Put the maps in, it would be great to see some of these maps in Rengaurd servers instead of the standard Westwood ones all the time because people dont download other maps. Although i already have all those maps others dont so include them in the update.
Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #92568] Fri, 04 June 2004 15:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
IRON FART
Messages: 1989
Registered: September 2003
Location: LOS ANGELES
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
If the patch has a sumple GUI etc., I think the decision to download the map should be made individually.

Download the patch > it shows you there is also a map available which can be downloaded while the patch is in progress.

Once the game is patched etc., the patch will place the file in the apropriate place.

Similar to a download manager, but only used for BHS downloads/updates.


http://www.baclan.org/albums/album05/dasmodell.jpg
Quote:


Quote from IRC
<[Digital]> get man_fucking_a_car.mpg
<[Digital]> ah fuck wrong window

Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #92743] Sat, 05 June 2004 09:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Hav0c is currently offline  Hav0c
Messages: 305
Registered: August 2003
Location: England, UK
Karma: 0
Recruit
Will the Siege map be Siege_Rebirth?

Thats the one with the fixed doors :S

I dont think the updated map has a different name so it should just overwrite the original if its installed Smile

[Updated on: Sat, 05 June 2004 09:23]

Report message to a moderator

Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #92747] Sat, 05 June 2004 09:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cowmisfit is currently offline  cowmisfit
Messages: 2035
Registered: May 2003
Karma: 0
General (2 Stars)
people always ask were to install maps, so if this auto instals them for them, it will be eaiser than having to tell them how to install them when they want in a server running them Smile, and it will allow servers running renguard to run those maps with out worring if people will have them or not and there server will be empty becuase everyone playing there say on complex has renguard, so if they have renguar when the map switchs they will have those maps as well Smile

http://img299.echo.cx/img299/7085/philly1ge.jpg
Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #94131] Thu, 10 June 2004 06:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
WNxTilly is currently offline  WNxTilly
Messages: 113
Registered: February 2003
Location: Sheffield, UK
Karma: 0
Recruit
I think that this is a good thing.
I know SK doesn't like this but think about it. Did we have a choice about getting Glacier in the very last WW patch? I think not!
We just had to download it.

I know that there are stories for both sides that all have very good arguments. If it makes you download it maybe people wont get the patch and this will thin out the Ren people even more in RG servers or it will allow servers to have more maps and stay much more full.

Also BHS people you need to check out C&C_Deth_Islands map
This solves the problem of base camping with MRLS from behind the barracks. Most people in the Euro WOL have this and so I think it would be a popular map if included.

Tilly


Warrior Nation Number One Gaming Clan In The World Very Happy
http://www.warriornation.net
XWIS Nick : WNxTilly

CABAL did steal my sig Razz
Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #94133] Thu, 10 June 2004 06:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
KIRBY098 is currently offline  KIRBY098
Messages: 1546
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Do it.

If it becomes a disaster I can always purge, and reload.

New auto-loading maps are about the only thing that will keep a real interest in Renegade. 98 % of people don't know how to put a downloaded file into their directories, mainly because they have never done it before.

Do it.


Deleted
Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #94150] Thu, 10 June 2004 09:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NHJ BV is currently offline  NHJ BV
Messages: 712
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
Colonel
I say make them compulsory (vote has ended Crying or Very Sad ), but you'll have to make sure the download can be resumed to help 56k'ers.
Should the maps we are making available be optional or not? [message #94161] Thu, 10 June 2004 10:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
sum41freaky is currently offline  sum41freaky
Messages: 44
Registered: April 2004
Location: netherlands
Karma: 0
Recruit
http://download.com.com/3000-2071-10279280.html?tag=lst-0-3

this a link to a program that can help 56k users
you can pause the download and resume it
and you can download movies from the EA web site with this program normal you have to watch movies on the site by it self but with that program you can simple download it to your pc
i use this program for a few days and i think it is realy good
Previous Topic: I dont see....
Next Topic: Here's a bug that could stand to be fixed.
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Nov 18 17:34:40 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01431 seconds