Home » Archived Forums » Core Patches » Reloading of Flying vehicles.
Reloading of Flying vehicles. [message #84342] |
Fri, 30 April 2004 06:37 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fa4c/4fa4c45c77288328f54dbc1905282e765682314e" alt="Go to next message Go to next message" |
KIRBY098
Messages: 1546 Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Will the rockets be the only thing needing reloading, or will the minigun need it too? If you decide to go with this option, I would suggest a default load of 1000 rounds.
Deleted
|
|
|
|
|
Reloading of Flying vehicles. [message #84403] |
Fri, 30 April 2004 12:04 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4c00/d4c00c5bc5e1339668eda9f53e4e3eeb6f57a9d6" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fa4c/4fa4c45c77288328f54dbc1905282e765682314e" alt="Go to next message Go to next message" |
KIRBY098
Messages: 1546 Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
I can burn through 1,000 rounds in no time. 150 is untenable. You would never be in combat, you would have to make 20 pitstops.
I assume that you thinking about modifying the cannon on the Apache then. Considering both the Orca, and the Apache currently have unnoticeable differences in armament, you are planning on deleting the Hellfires from the Apache, upgrading with a DU cannon, and making the Orca dependent on the TOW missiles while deleting the Gatling gun?
I wouldn't mess with the armaments. Just make them refill for missiles, and compromise with 500 rounds chain gun ammo.
Deleted
|
|
|
|
Reloading of Flying vehicles. [message #84410] |
Fri, 30 April 2004 12:21 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4c00/d4c00c5bc5e1339668eda9f53e4e3eeb6f57a9d6" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fa4c/4fa4c45c77288328f54dbc1905282e765682314e" alt="Go to next message Go to next message" |
KIRBY098
Messages: 1546 Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Post whatever stats you want, but the fact remains that in this game currently, they both fire the same missiles, and both have miniguns that fire at the same rate.
They are essentially equal in battle, and rely on piloting skills to determine the victor in a one on one.
Deleted
|
|
|
Reloading of Flying vehicles. [message #84412] |
Fri, 30 April 2004 12:26 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4c00/d4c00c5bc5e1339668eda9f53e4e3eeb6f57a9d6" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fa4c/4fa4c45c77288328f54dbc1905282e765682314e" alt="Go to next message Go to next message" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9e97/c9e97199c8b05e8a8d1372a1d8f2d237e0a525ef" alt="" |
Aircraftkiller
Messages: 8213 Registered: February 2003
Karma: 1
|
General (5 Stars) |
|
|
The Orca can't carry a fucking GAU-8/A, the damn thing is bigger than a Volkswagen car! Only the A-10A is meant to be fitted with that cannon.
Please stop posting bullshit spam in the forum, Seaman.
The Apache's cannon range is 50 meters shorter than the Orca's - that's a huge difference in combat and puts the Apache at a disadvantage. I should know because I've been the victim of being hit from a large distance away by Orca cannon fire while I'm not close enough to do anything about it except get hammered.
Making the Orca and Apache different in air combat and in ground support will make the game feel different, at the very least, including balancing it out better so you're not forced to have the same exact unit on both teams, just with a different look.
[Updated on: Fri, 30 April 2004 14:42] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Reloading of Flying vehicles. [message #84419] |
Fri, 30 April 2004 12:51 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4c00/d4c00c5bc5e1339668eda9f53e4e3eeb6f57a9d6" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fa4c/4fa4c45c77288328f54dbc1905282e765682314e" alt="Go to next message Go to next message" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf12c/bf12cd2a6ffcb32f75cfa17505903662ed1fbc93" alt="" |
Deathgod
Messages: 504 Registered: February 2003 Location: The House of B
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65ede/65ede4c1c30ddc3c2b639f103dadf391a314fd22" alt="priestofb"
|
|
So the Apache doesn't actually use the CnC_Ammo_Apache_Rocket?
That one fires in a 2 round spread it looks like, like the STank or the recon bikes... too bad it doesn't get used.
WOL: priestofb
FUD Online for Renegade character details
The preceding post was sponsored by FUD.
We are the way, you are in the way.â„¢
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reloading of Flying vehicles. [message #85318] |
Mon, 03 May 2004 17:50 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4c00/d4c00c5bc5e1339668eda9f53e4e3eeb6f57a9d6" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fa4c/4fa4c45c77288328f54dbc1905282e765682314e" alt="Go to next message Go to next message" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ba97/9ba978375d930553588e21949300738f55d8abdb" alt="" |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
I know! For the orca, how about you fit it with a modiied vulcan cannon on the front that basically consists of six of the U.S.S. North Carolina's 19 inch guns put together into minigun form! It would shoot about 100 tons of lead and explosives a second!
But moving on, I like the idea of snipers no longer hurting aircraft, aircraft not needing to refuel (a tank of gas lasts a chopper hours) and the Orca and Apache having different weapons.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
Reloading of Flying vehicles. [message #85346] |
Mon, 03 May 2004 20:48 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4c00/d4c00c5bc5e1339668eda9f53e4e3eeb6f57a9d6" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fa4c/4fa4c45c77288328f54dbc1905282e765682314e" alt="Go to next message Go to next message" |
Phoenix - Aeon
Messages: 221 Registered: April 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
No. No. No. No. NOOOOO!!!
Simlpe fact, just because a piece of hardware is this way in real life does not mean it has to be that way in game. If it was then AK's "buy it, fire once, game over" weapon would be the MRLS. Incase you didn't know the MRLS is a british artillery system capable of devestating a 1*1km square of land using a system of 16 missiles launched simultaneously across the landscap. Hey won't that be fun kids? Whilst we're at it we can limit the mammoth to one round because guess what? Twin barrels would rip the turret off. Oh, and btw GDI, you know the U.N made that Ion cannon of yours illeagel, guess that's out of the picture. The black hand had better not shoot anything red or those lasers will just bounce right back, nit that it makes a difference anyway; red light's at too low a frequency to do damage. Come back when you learn how to use microwaves boys. Finally, news just in for Nod artillery gunners, your cannon has a range of 27 km, but tough shit GDI will still rip you to pieces, MRLS has got 32km.
Now perhaps all of that crap I wrote above hasn't got the point across (it probably hasn't: I rely more on tone of voice than actual words) so I'll say things plainly, if Renegade was realistic it wouldn't be fun, or have half the shit in it that it does. Also, AK's right, the game should be based on C&C, anyone who can't understand that an FPS version of C&C chould be like C&C is... well, you can think up of an insult,mainly because I can't be arsed starting a flame-war (though I suppose it may be too late now).
BTW, you'll have to excuse me if I seem a little off, ot's 4:48 in the morning here in England.
|
|
|
Reloading of Flying vehicles. [message #85685] |
Wed, 05 May 2004 17:07 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4c00/d4c00c5bc5e1339668eda9f53e4e3eeb6f57a9d6" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fa4c/4fa4c45c77288328f54dbc1905282e765682314e" alt="Go to next message Go to next message" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ba97/9ba978375d930553588e21949300738f55d8abdb" alt="" |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756 Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Uh, lol, we were talking about HELICOPTERS and FLYING VEHICLES, not ARTILLERY. lol.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reloading of Flying vehicles. [message #86034] |
Fri, 07 May 2004 16:14 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4c00/d4c00c5bc5e1339668eda9f53e4e3eeb6f57a9d6" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" |
Phoenix - Aeon
Messages: 221 Registered: April 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Your right about it being based off of the M-2 Bradley, but we were the first to stick the mrls turret on it. General dynamics built their version because ours was really just a couple of different things thrown together, though it can carry a bigger payload. So it's was a joint venture really, I'm just used to thinking of it in British terms, my bad.
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Feb 22 03:41:51 MST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01465 seconds
|