Mammoth Tank improvements - "Making that thing worth it [message #83735] |
Tue, 27 April 2004 07:40 |
Homey
Messages: 1084 Registered: February 2003 Location: Canada
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Increasing it to that much is fuckin stupid, maybe 50m or 55m, either that or have them turn much sharper so u can aim straight up. Also light tanks just don't do enough damage, a little more would benefit them.
Homey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mammoth Tank improvements - "Making that thing worth it [message #83810] |
Tue, 27 April 2004 14:27 |
|
YSLMuffins
Messages: 1144 Registered: February 2003 Location: Moved a long time ago (it...
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) Moderator - Mod Forum |
|
|
I don't know, I can't remember the last time that a mammoth tank rush on Under has failed.
Besides, I don't understand why the tusks have to be the better weapon, but they are, and they have such HUGE splash damage! I thought they idea was to lay down suppression fire with the cannons until the Mammy can get close enough to deal the real damage with the missiles.
But if the cannons must be improved, why not have them fire in a rapid 1-2 succession, reload, and then repeat. It would more closely resemble the way they worked in RA/C&C and at the same time increase ROF without having to affect cannon damage.
-YSLMuffins
The goddess of all (bread products)
See me online as yslcheeze
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|