| The banning of 'pimp boy joe' [message #66067] |
Wed, 11 February 2004 18:08   |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma:
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
| da_shiz |
no self-respecting adult would post all caps posts.
|
Why not? Because you wouldn't? You can't speak for everyone, you know.
| da_shiz |
The more you bitch about the idea of you and pimp boy joe being one in the same, the more obvious it becomes that you two ARE one in the same.
|
You want to know why he keeps complaining at everyone? Because all of your arguements are stupid. All of the people against PBJ in the thread are just building off of what each other say without applying any rational thinking.
| da_shiz |
Just admit it, it's over...you two are one in the same.
|
Just because a majority believes something doesn't make it true.
| da_shiz |
Keep fighting it all you want, just going to make it harder on yourself.
|
No, the only thing that could possibly be making it any harder on him is you people and your B.S. claims.
How about all you people just drop it? You can't prove that those two accounts are the same person, and he already gave a story against everything you've said, but you all just keep coming back and being loud trying to prove something that you can't know.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
