Renegade Public Forums
C&C: Renegade --> Dying since 2003™, resurrected in 2024!
Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » OT: Political IQ Test
OT: Political IQ Test [message #65514] Sat, 07 February 2004 20:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
SuperFlyingEngi is currently offline  SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Nodbugger

Id reply to this, but its just a bunch of non-sense.


Is it just me, or did you actually reply to his post?

Hell, I was gonna say the same thing about your crap arguments except I knew you'd come back with the little kid response of something like: "Oh yeah? Well, you just know I'm right and you're trying to back out of something you started."

Funny, thing is, you're calling his arguments stupid because [I'm going out on a limb here] he didn't use as many facts as you're accustomed to from [I'm trying to be modest, I really am] me. While in fact, you really don't have anything to show for what you say except for that stupid book that for all anyone knows you typed yourself, printed the pages and bound them in to what you probably thought was a good argumental piece.

Crimson: Wow, your dad spent about 450 hours working on that piece of trash poster? I'm afraid that I cannot restrain myself when I say "Ha Ha!". He really needs to get a life.


"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)

"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)

The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
OT: Political IQ Test [message #65515] Sat, 07 February 2004 20:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Crimson is currently offline  Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR
You need to grow up.

I'm the bawss.
OT: Political IQ Test [message #65517] Sat, 07 February 2004 20:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nodbugger is currently offline  Nodbugger
Messages: 976
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
Colonel
SuperFlyingEngi

Nodbugger

Id reply to this, but its just a bunch of non-sense.


Is it just me, or did you actually reply to his post?

Hell, I was gonna say the same thing about your crap arguments except I knew you'd come back with the little kid response of something like: "Oh yeah? Well, you just know I'm right and you're trying to back out of something you started."

Funny, thing is, you're calling his arguments stupid because [I'm going out on a limb here] he didn't use as many facts as you're accustomed to from [I'm trying to be modest, I really am] me. While in fact, you really don't have anything to show for what you say except for that stupid book that for all anyone knows you typed yourself, printed the pages and bound them in to what you probably thought was a good argumental piece.

Crimson: Wow, your dad spent about 450 hours working on that piece of trash poster? I'm afraid that I cannot restrain myself when I say "Ha Ha!". He really needs to get a life.



Reply as in give a response to what "information" in his post.

And why were my arguments crap? Because they totally ripped apart your half-assed "argument"?

And what book are you talking about? That page I scanned was the only part of this book I have ever seen. Like I said before. It was part of a reading comprehension test we had to do in ROTC (prepearing for SAT)

And I found it interesting becuase it made sense and proved you wrong. And whn have I ever given a "Oh yeah? Well, you just know I'm right and you're trying to back out of something you started." statement about anyhting. From what Ive seen Youve said bullshit, I presented facts and you kep digging in deeper until you no longer made sense.


http://www.n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1129285834
OT: Political IQ Test [message #65518] Sat, 07 February 2004 20:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
U927 is currently offline  U927
Messages: 709
Registered: February 2003
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Karma: 0
Colonel
pimp boy joe

you fucking republican bitches!!!!! whyd you fuck up our government!!! god, its not clinton fauly he go serviced, but it is george bushes fault that he snorted too much crack and that his dad was so damn rich that he got to go to yale, evn though he fucking flunked out he still got to go, good job destroying the enviornment and ruining everyhting the deomcrats have ever done for us!!! you guys are probably all catholics!!!!! catholicism sucks!!1 your stupid popes rape children you sick bastards, i bet your all duke fans!! well you know what duke can suck my balls!!!!!! i fucking hat duke!!! FUK THEM GODDAM THEMM I HATE THEM SOO MUCH THEY RUINED MY LIFE !!!!!! fuck republicans!!!!! fcuk all you republican bastards that post stuff on here i fucking hate and go to hell!!! . . .. BITCH ILL BE BACK


Jesus Christ, this is so funny I'm going to have to wait a few minutes so I can stop laughing before responding.

OK, your post has not one hint of evidence to say "republicans suck". Hell, your entire paragraph is nothing but insults, as with every other post you made after this one. While I'm not a Republican, I can safely say that both Republicans AND Democrats alike in this thread would call you a retard. This thread is for logical discussion and debating over things that can actually be debated, not over "goerge bush snorting too much crack".

You father doesn't happen to be your brother too, does he?


We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence then, is not an act but a habit. - Aristotle

8-Bit Theatre. The power of evil compels you!
OT: Political IQ Test [message #65522] Sat, 07 February 2004 20:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
SuperFlyingEngi is currently offline  SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Nodbugger

From what Ive seen Youve said bullshit, I presented facts and you kep digging in deeper until you no longer made sense.


What's the matter? Did you get a sudden memory lapse and forget about the whole rest of this thread? So, you've presented facts...like? Like nothing. Re-read this whole thread. You'll notice a pattern of me putting up facts and YOU calling me stupid and what-not because of reasons only known to yourself. A couple pages ago you said that you were beating me with "common sense" [which you really weren't, since opinions don't equal facts.] And now, without really adding anything, you're saying that you're shutting down my B.S. arguments with your "facts". Re-read the thread. Show me what "facts" you've presented thus far.

Nodbugger

And why were my arguments crap?


Because they were. Now sit down and shut up until you get something to back up what you're saying. And saying that you already have doesn't count. Because quite frankly, you haven't.


"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)

"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)

The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
OT: Political IQ Test [message #65525] Sat, 07 February 2004 21:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Llama Man 451 is currently offline  Llama Man 451
Messages: 79
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
Recruit
damn pmp boy you laid down the line so badly that even crimson cant come up with another poster hher dad threw his life away for for 700 hours.

my response to your last post nodbugger (there are two)

1. holy shit you can read!!!!!

2.you have not presented any reliable facts this entire thread . . . all you do is talk about how stupid someone is after they something that proves you wrong. im surprisede ou republicans always make up lies about some incorrect reading or some document when it seems you don read very thouroughly at all . . .
OT: Political IQ Test [message #65527] Sat, 07 February 2004 22:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
U927 is currently offline  U927
Messages: 709
Registered: February 2003
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Karma: 0
Colonel
Llama Man 451

damn pmp boy you laid down the line so badly that even crimson cant come up with another poster hher dad threw his life away for for 700 hours.

my response to your last post nodbugger (there are two)

1. holy shit you can read!!!!!

2.you have not presented any reliable facts this entire thread . . . all you do is talk about how stupid someone is after they something that proves you wrong. im surprisede ou republicans always make up lies about some incorrect reading or some document when it seems you don read very thouroughly at all . . .


He didn't "lay down the line". He's a retarded fuck who thinks that insulting a side in the argument will make him look cool, even though this debate is solely based on legit and valid arguments, not incoherent ad hominem.

He's a fucktard, and if you praise him because of his posts, you are no better than he is.


We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence then, is not an act but a habit. - Aristotle

8-Bit Theatre. The power of evil compels you!
OT: Political IQ Test [message #65540] Sun, 08 February 2004 01:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Crimson is currently offline  Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR
OK, retard. I said 450 hours, not 700. And 450 OR 700 hours does not constitute "laying down one's life".

That said, here's something he put together for you all... since you all ignored me last time I said it, now I post his words for you to once again ignore:

---------------

To the person debating the integrity of former President Clinton... I have this to say...


There exists a need for any organization to rally its followers, members, the unwashed to join together in a common cause. The Nazis used the Jews for this purpose. We can see pep rallies in high schools to whip up support for the team to beat a rival school in a sports game. We see it in the Olympics when we cheer for the team representing the country.
We see the "Ford" vs. "Chevy" fight as to which company makes the best pick-up truck. The negative side of this is when we see a group of minorities being used as the scapegoat. I'm sure you have heard others blame white men, blacks, Mexicans, gays, people in the north, the south, east/west coasts, Christians, Jews, Muslim or atheists for the problems in the world. What you are doing is the same thing...blaming Bush or the Republicans for the problems. Let me ask you this...when a pick pocket thief wants to take your money, what does he have to do first?.....He has to create a distraction!! What is happening in today's America is this infighting among the population. The results of this is the US Government is picking the pockets of Americans for $3,000,000,000,000.00 a year. The federal government was given 19 functions and those functions not given to the Feds was to be left to the individual states. Example of these functions include "provide for the common defense", "mint the money", and "mediate between the states". To fund these functions requires, according to Economics Professor Walter E. Williams, about $700 billion. Instead we have empowered the fed to become "Robin Hoods" and take from the rich and give to the poor about $2.3 trillion!!! Our country has divided into those who suckle from the public mammary and those who have become the mammary. The US Government has "dumbed down" our population. You can hear candidates back to Windrow Wilson speaking about more money for education. The present Democratic candidates are screaming about health care and the public has forgotten that Clinton tried and failed to correct health care issues in his first year in office and did NOT touch it during the rest of his seven years. ALL candidates only use the buzz words to fool the electorate to vote for them. It rare to see a promise kept by either party. There never seems to be a shortage of new "programs" to keep the idiots coming back for more. A few years ago there was a million dollars set aside to restore the boyhood home of Lawence Welk. You mean that I have to give up my money for that? An unwed woman has unprotected sex and gets pregnant and the US Govvernment wants me to pay for it? A kid throws spit balls in class and doesn't learn his lessons and as an adult is not able to get a better than minimum wage job and wants me to pay to improve his life! A former KKK member in the US Senate becomes so powerful that his state gets 59% more than they contribute, http://www.ppinys.org/nybalpayments.htm#table , and they end up with highways to nowhere! A Harvard buddy helps another to molest a girlfriend and then is rewarded with contract for $600 toilet seat and $300 hammers and I'm to pay for this! I'm to pay for some "artist" to piss in a bottle with a picture of the Pope! I'm to pay for internet for the poor! Damn look how thick the federal budget in book form is! You will NOT convince me that half of the spending is the responsibility of the federal government. So as far as I'm concerned the left and the right are screwing ALL of us. We need to stop fighting amongst ourselves and unite to stop our government from the "pick pocketing" of the people. Look at your paycheck and then try to convince me that you need to PAY MORE TAXES!!!

-------------


I'm the bawss.
OT: Political IQ Test [message #65569] Sun, 08 February 2004 07:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Llama Man 451 is currently offline  Llama Man 451
Messages: 79
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
Recruit
even though you act as though you are conservative mr. crimson, it seems you are definately blasting clinton waaaay more thatn bush, and bush is the one with the 91 IQ. you blast clinton for health care . . . bush probably doesnt even know how to spell that let alone deal with it. all of bush's claims that he ran for as president have not been fulfilled. he had talks of the enviornment and social security. shit, his plan of "social security" was friggin duct tape!!!!! DUCT TAPE!!!!! also i feel that it was hypocritical of you to start off the letter as to those who think clinto was a good president (not exact quote) when at the end you sad we should get over our differences and stop fighting about political parties that sorta doesnt make any sense at all. also, if clinton was the bad president why are you calling the government bush appointed a thief? i think your speech is slightly flawed . . . but in some aspects true . . . but mostly just flawed. tell me to look at my paycheck and see if i cant pay (laughs) if every person paid $5 to help out poror/uneducated/etc. that would add up to approximately $1,375,000,000 . . . that is assuming there are exxactly 275,000,000 which there may be more or less . . . but still that is over a billion dollars well over as a matter of fact. it is ridiculous to say if you get a paycheck that you cannot put up five dollars!!!

and crimson i knew it was 450, i was just havin a little fun, but i forgot when it comes to politics NO FUN IS ALLOWED AT ALL.


"You all stare but you'll never see/ There's someting inside me" - Corey Taylor

Life is strange when you must lock your door in fear of your cat

Sometimes when I'm all alone I stare at my goldfish, and think about how much I hate fishticks, then I realize that I don't have a goldfish.

There is a fair chance that at this moment I am being hunted by a demonic monkey from Central America. Please don't tell him I've been here. Please. I don't know what he wants.
OT: Political IQ Test [message #65599] Sun, 08 February 2004 11:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
NukeIt15 is currently offline  NukeIt15
Messages: 987
Registered: February 2003
Location: Out to lunch
Karma: 0
Colonel
wait..."mr" crimson? Shocked Laughing

"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived of the use of them." - Thomas Paine

Remember, kids: illiteracy is cool. If you took the time to read this, you are clearly a loser who will never get laid. You've been warned.
OT: Political IQ Test [message #65601] Sun, 08 February 2004 12:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Llama Man 451 is currently offline  Llama Man 451
Messages: 79
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
Recruit
ummm yeah "mr" crimson those were her dads words maybe you should learn to read

umbral- not that it has anything to do with anything but your icon thing is cool looking
OT: Political IQ Test [message #65602] Sun, 08 February 2004 12:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Crimson is currently offline  Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR
You're inferring things that I didn't say. Read the note again, then read your reply, and see if you can find your errors.

I'm the bawss.
OT: Political IQ Test [message #65662] Mon, 09 February 2004 03:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
exnyte is currently offline  exnyte
Messages: 746
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
Colonel
Llama Man 451

i think your speech is slightly flawed . . . but in some aspects true . . . but mostly just flawed.


... Huh? So you're saying that the speech is slightly flawed, with some true aspects, but mostly flawed... Read that again and tell me you don't go... huh? You might as well as said that you can talk, but really you can't.

Llama Man 451

tell me to look at my paycheck and see if i cant pay (laughs) if every person paid $5 to help out poror/uneducated/etc. that would add up to approximately $1,375,000,000 . . . that is assuming there are exxactly 275,000,000 which there may be more or less . . .


Two things.. First, your formula would only work if all (roughly) 275,000,000 were making an income. If all 275,000,000 were making an income, everyone wouldn't need to give $5 to help out the poor. Second, there is well more than $5 taken out of each and every one of my checks. If this isn't going to help the "poror/uneducated/etc.", where the hell is it going, and why do they keep taking it?


OT: Political IQ Test [message #65700] Mon, 09 February 2004 14:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
SuperFlyingEngi is currently offline  SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Where does all of that money go?

Well, the biggest single expenditure by the U.S.A. right now is the War in Iraq. Hurray! Your tax money gets to go in to a war that was started on false pretexts (WMDs)! Funny thing is, Bush didn't include the cost of the War in Iraq in the budget he submitted to Congress a month or two ago. He classified it as a "special expenditure". Special enough that it would make his budget look really bad. Another thing that would make his budget look bad is the tax cuts he passed. The money the government no longer gets in the form of taxes because of those cuts is still included in Bush's budget. He's basing his spending on money that isn't there. Oh, don't worry. He can cut health care to get all the money that he needs!

Why do they keep taking your money?

Because that's how governments work. They tax citizens so that they can have money to pay salaries of civil servants and maintain the country to the best of their ability.


"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)

"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)

The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
OT: Political IQ Test [message #65717] Mon, 09 February 2004 16:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Llama Man 451 is currently offline  Llama Man 451
Messages: 79
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
Recruit
Llama Man 451 wrote:
i think your speech is slightly flawed . . . but in some aspects true . . . but mostly just flawed.


... Huh? So you're saying that the speech is slightly flawed, with some true aspects, but mostly flawed... Read that again and tell me you don't go... huh? You might as well as said that you can talk, but really you can't.


this statement is useless and idiotic on your part, i hope you werent trying to make a point because you failed miserably. ill try to express myself monosylabically next time cuz i know you have problems sometimes. in other words

most of the speech was bullshit. some of it had some truth in it. but it was mostly bullshit. it is NOT hard to understand.

also, if more is getiting taken out from each person who makes money that would help make up for lost money from people who have no income. even so it would still easily exceed the 1,000,000,000 dollar point.


"You all stare but you'll never see/ There's someting inside me" - Corey Taylor

Life is strange when you must lock your door in fear of your cat

Sometimes when I'm all alone I stare at my goldfish, and think about how much I hate fishticks, then I realize that I don't have a goldfish.

There is a fair chance that at this moment I am being hunted by a demonic monkey from Central America. Please don't tell him I've been here. Please. I don't know what he wants.
OT: Political IQ Test [message #65718] Mon, 09 February 2004 17:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
pimp boy joe
Messages: 12
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
Recruit
hey you bitch-ass republicans da pimp is back in the motherfuckin hizzouse. i know you worthless bitches me talkin bout suckin my balls. (crimson last night was crappy by the way, you should try ahrder) but anyway after my fuckin brilliant masterpiece song i felt i should holler back at youz guyz and remind you that you fucking suck michael jacksons balls when you arent smoking crack with g dubya jackass. now you republican fuckers in the hizzie know me, i wanna end on good notes for shizzie. crimson, you suck, and so do you nodbugg-ass bitch (you like that asshole, you want somma dis? bitch bring your gay ass swastika you jew hating bastard!!!). any of you motherfuckers who say i suck SUCK balls. whenever you see a fine pimp such as myself walk by you say oooooooh i wanna suck his balls to bad i got an appointment with micheal jackson tonight. well homies i gots to go rub some whore ass so fuck you bitch ass republicans!!!!! as always i hate you . . . and you suck donkey balls

Catholics = racist stuck in the past child child molestors

Republicans = mother fucking retards that are ignorant.

Duke fans = duesh bags

Since all duke fans are republican, and allrepublicans are catholic:

You republicans are racist stuck in the past child molesting ignorant mother fucking retard duesh bags

Fuck yeah you guys suck
OT: Political IQ Test [message #65728] Mon, 09 February 2004 17:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
U927 is currently offline  U927
Messages: 709
Registered: February 2003
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Karma: 0
Colonel
pimp boy joe

hey you bitch-ass republicans da pimp is back in the motherfuckin hizzouse. i know you worthless bitches me talkin bout suckin my balls. (crimson last night was crappy by the way, you should try ahrder) but anyway after my fuckin brilliant masterpiece song i felt i should holler back at youz guyz and remind you that you fucking suck michael jacksons balls when you arent smoking crack with g dubya jackass. now you republican fuckers in the hizzie know me, i wanna end on good notes for shizzie. crimson, you suck, and so do you nodbugg-ass bitch (you like that asshole, you want somma dis? bitch bring your gay ass swastika you jew hating bastard!!!). any of you motherfuckers who say i suck SUCK balls. whenever you see a fine pimp such as myself walk by you say oooooooh i wanna suck his balls to bad i got an appointment with micheal jackson tonight. well homies i gots to go rub some whore ass so fuck you bitch ass republicans!!!!! as always i hate you . . . and you suck donkey balls


Once again, I have to ask, is your father your brother as well?

Crimson, please ban this fuckhead from this forum. He is providing no productive input whatsoever in this arguement.


We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence then, is not an act but a habit. - Aristotle

8-Bit Theatre. The power of evil compels you!
OT: Political IQ Test [message #65732] Mon, 09 February 2004 18:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
MrBob is currently offline  MrBob
Messages: 474
Registered: February 2003
Location: Virginia, USA
Karma: 0
Commander

pimp boy joe

hey you bitch-ass republicans da pimp is back in the motherfuckin hizzouse. i know you worthless bitches me talkin bout suckin my balls. (crimson last night was crappy by the way, you should try ahrder) but anyway after my fuckin brilliant masterpiece song i felt i should holler back at youz guyz and remind you that you fucking suck michael jacksons balls when you arent smoking crack with g dubya jackass. now you republican fuckers in the hizzie know me, i wanna end on good notes for shizzie. crimson, you suck, and so do you nodbugg-ass bitch (you like that asshole, you want somma dis? bitch bring your gay ass swastika you jew hating bastard!!!). any of you motherfuckers who say i suck SUCK balls. whenever you see a fine pimp such as myself walk by you say oooooooh i wanna suck his balls to bad i got an appointment with micheal jackson tonight. well homies i gots to go rub some whore ass so fuck you bitch ass republicans!!!!! as always i hate you . . . and you suck donkey balls


Are you serious? Or, I should say trying to be serious? Because you can't possibly be.

I agree, "pimp boy joe" needs a bannin'


God is the "0wnage". Plain and Simple.

Visit http://www.theoriginalmrbob.com

"If there's one freak to be, it's a Jesus freak"

All your base are belong to us.
OT: Political IQ Test [message #65735] Mon, 09 February 2004 18:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
pimp boy joe
Messages: 12
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
Recruit
yo you censorist motherfuckers i cant believe dis shit, just cuz im trying to speak the word and you aint got no comebacks you gonna ban me??? dats almost as whacka g dubya, and it is typically republican which is why i hate you assholes. go ahead ban me and prove the stereotype right about you assholes.

if you let me stay on, you communist republican assholes, i swear ill tone it down a little, but i only said the things i did cuz you suckahs deserved it


Catholics = racist stuck in the past child child molestors

Republicans = mother fucking retards that are ignorant.

Duke fans = duesh bags

Since all duke fans are republican, and allrepublicans are catholic:

You republicans are racist stuck in the past child molesting ignorant mother fucking retard duesh bags

Fuck yeah you guys suck
OT: Political IQ Test [message #65738] Mon, 09 February 2004 19:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
U927 is currently offline  U927
Messages: 709
Registered: February 2003
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Karma: 0
Colonel
pimp boy joe

yo you censorist motherfuckers i cant believe dis shit, just cuz im trying to speak the word and you aint got no comebacks you gonna ban me??? dats almost as whacka g dubya, and it is typically republican which is why i hate you assholes. go ahead ban me and prove the stereotype right about you assholes.

if you let me stay on, you communist republican assholes, i swear ill tone it down a little, but i only said the things i did cuz you suckahs deserved it


This is not a forum for you to take a dump on. Children visit these threads, and you WILL censor your language and act like a decent person with actual arguments, instead of spewing out insults which you think actually affect us.

Also, what stereotype? If you really want to know, I am a Democrat. So because I tell you to shut the hell up you automatically think I'm a Republican? You have some serious issues, my friend. Resolve them first, then come back to these forums and make your posts actually understandable and legit, not that name-calling crap you posted above.


We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence then, is not an act but a habit. - Aristotle

8-Bit Theatre. The power of evil compels you!
OT: Political IQ Test [message #65749] Mon, 09 February 2004 20:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Javaxcx
Messages: 1943
Registered: February 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)

Speaking of steriotypes, did you know that all your "homies" are probably republican by association?


http://n00bstories.com/image.fetch.php?id=1144717496


Sniper Extraordinaire
Read the FUD Rules before you come in and make an ass of yourself.

All your base are belong to us.
You have no chance to survive make your time.
OT: Political IQ Test [message #65751] Mon, 09 February 2004 20:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Crimson is currently offline  Crimson
Messages: 7429
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR
My main concern is his obsession with sucking balls.

He needs a banning.


I'm the bawss.
OT: Political IQ Test [message #65753] Mon, 09 February 2004 20:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
SuperFlyingEngi is currently offline  SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
General (1 Star)
Instead of just sitting here and complaining about pimp boy joe, can we get back to the issue at hand? There's a nice little thread in General Discussion concerning said person, and this thread is losing what it was meant for.

So, to start everyone off again, here's some stuff about Bush being bad:

Bush said 2 of the Army's 10 active divisions were not ready for combat. However, he did not furnish the real reason for that circumstance. According to Steven Lee Myers in Monday's issue of the NYT, the two divisions in question, "the 10th Mountain and the 1st Mechanized Infantry, were briefly classified as unready for war last fall, not because they suffered from budget cuts and low morale, as Mr. Bush suggested, but rather because large parts of the divisions were keeping peace in Bosnia and Kosovo."

During his fifth year as a guardsman, Bush's records show no sign he appeared for duty.
May 24, 1972: Bush, who has moved to Alabama to work on a US Senate race, gets permission to serve with a reserve unit in Alabama. But headquarters decided Bush must serve with a more active unit.
Sept. 5, 1972: Bush is granted permission to do his Guard duty at the 187th Tactical Recon Group in Montgomery. But Bush's record shows no evidence he did the duty, and the unit commander says he never showed up.
November 1972 to April 30, 1973: Bush returns to Houston, but apparently not to his Air Force unit.
May 2, 1973: The two lieutenant colonels in charge of Bush's unit in Houston cannot rate him for the prior 12 months, saying he has not been at the unit in that period.

Have fun!


"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)

"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)

The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
OT: Political IQ Test [message #65784] Tue, 10 February 2004 00:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
exnyte is currently offline  exnyte
Messages: 746
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
Colonel
SuperFlyingEngi

Where does all of that money go?

Well, the biggest single expenditure by the U.S.A. right now is the War in Iraq. Hurray! Your tax money gets to go in to a war that was started on false pretexts (WMDs)!


That's just fine! I'm happy to help pay for this. Why? It's simple! I don't want my money to goto those who aren't trying to help themselves. The Iraqi people couldn't do it alone and I'm happy that we were able to assist them. Even if you believe that the reasons for going into Iraq were false, doesn't make them less of a threat. You have to remember that you don't speak for everyone and you screaming it everytime the opportunity arises doesn't make your claims any more true. I'm glad my money is going to help the Iraqi people start a better life with out Saddam's rule. I'd rather it go there than to help someone on welfare because they decided welfare is easier than getting a job.

Llama Man 451

this statement is useless and idiotic on your part...


Acually, all your statements are useless and idiotic. You have yet to say anything productive. All you've done is mimic everything SuperFlyingEngi has said.

Llama Man 451

"i think your speech is slightly flawed . . . but in some aspects true . . . but mostly just flawed."

"most of the speech was bullshit. some of it had some truth in it. but it was mostly bullshit. it is NOT hard to understand."


These two statements are completely different. Your first statement first states the speech was slightly flawed, then immediately stated that it's mostly flawed. That's called contradiction. This is the reason it makes no sense. Your second statement, on the other hand, does make sense. It says it's bullshit, then states it does have some truths, then reiterates that it's mostly bullshit. A structurally valid statement, even if the premises of it are false. I hope you understand that now, and at least learn from your mistakes. Now if only you'd just stop posting. Or at least start posting with what most others would call grammar and sentence structure. Also, if you're going to use big words like "monosyllabically", you might want to make sure you spell them right first.


OT: Political IQ Test [message #65792] Tue, 10 February 2004 02:14 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Blazer is currently offline  Blazer
Messages: 3322
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
General (3 Stars)
Administrator/General

pimp boy joe

yo you censorist motherfuckers i cant believe dis shit, just cuz im trying to speak the word and you aint got no comebacks you gonna ban me???


I can't believe that the IP you have been posting from is the same as Llama man Razz

http://www.n00bstories.com/hosted_files/ownt.gif
Previous Topic: Bush in 30 Seconds
Next Topic: What happened with Saddam?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Jul 16 14:40:06 MST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01659 seconds