Home » General Discussions » Heated Discussions and Debates » OT: Political IQ Test
| OT: Political IQ Test [message #65256] |
Thu, 05 February 2004 20:23   |
 |
U927
Messages: 709
Registered: February 2003
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| Javaxcx |
Actually, I didn't want the news when Saddam was captured. I've learned that the on-the-spot news has revealed half-truths and biased propaganda. I'm completely serious, so don't get the impression that I'm attacking you by saying that.
See, the problem with proving that Iraq had no connections to 9/11 is like trying to find a needle in a haystack. Media can be twisted to support a certain idea, circumstantial evidence, or political sway. This has been proven time and time again. If you need proof, just look at different news sites and look at the avid differences in opinion.
|
I wholeheartedly agree with you on this one. Today in my debate class we were discussing propaganda, and the issue of media came up.
For example: 9/11. Our entire focus goes to Afghanistan and the capture of Osama. Then, after the Afghani conflict is resolved, another issue pops up: North Korea and its nuclear arsenal. Afterwards, Iraq. We fought a "war" (if you really want to call it one) and won. Seven months later we capture Hussein. Now what's on the news. Janet Jackson's boob.
What I find incredulous is the way people interpret the media. They see all the negative things going on in the country because that is all the media focuses on. Therefore, they can go and say that all the bad things happening are due to the administration. This applies to both parties, so don't go saying "LEIK OGM Y R U SUPOTRING TEM!!!!111".
It's all about the ratings. The "big issues" in the presidential debates are mostly going to be red herrings.
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence then, is not an act but a habit. - Aristotle
8-Bit Theatre. The power of evil compels you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| OT: Political IQ Test [message #65280] |
Thu, 05 February 2004 22:35 |
 |
Crimson
Messages: 7430
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
If reducing the numbers in the military didn't make a difference, explain the intelligence failure on 9/11 and the intelligence failure in finding WMD so far.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
| OT: Political IQ Test [message #65298] |
Fri, 06 February 2004 08:17 |
 |
NukeIt15
Messages: 987
Registered: February 2003
Location: Out to lunch
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
Look, you retards...Saddam USED WMD's. Remember the attacks on the kurds in northern Iraq? He used CHEMICAL WEAPONS such as mustar dgas and nerve agents to carry out those attacks. WMD does NOT mean just germs, or just nukes. Did you know that in the earliest days of the war, US troops found large quantities of agricultural chemicals (which are actually quite potent as nerve agents) which NO Iraqui under Sadam would have been able to afford? We're talking dozens of barrels, here, not just your average tank and sprayer. They've already FOUND weapons of mass destruction, but everyone's so damn busy looking for nukes that they don't notice what they already have. Just because it isn't made by a company dedicated to military equipmnet does NOT mean it can't be used as a weapon; McVeigh showed that when he used FERTILIZER to blow up the federal building in Oklahoma City. The Agricultural chemicals found in Iraq could kill a human in minutes if they were used in the quantities and concentrations that were discovered. That was on the news, but it's been overshadowed because people have been bitching about finding weaponized WMD's, AND NOT THE MATERIALS USED TO MAKE THEM! I know exactly what these chemicals could have been used for, my dad used to work with shit like this. Improvised weapons can be obtained by legal means, and are legal right up until you assemble them- and no one would be the wiser if they didn't know what you were up to.
"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived of the use of them." - Thomas Paine
Remember, kids: illiteracy is cool. If you took the time to read this, you are clearly a loser who will never get laid. You've been warned.
|
|
|
|
| OT: Political IQ Test [message #65336] |
Fri, 06 February 2004 14:05 |
Llama Man 451
Messages: 79
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
|
nuke- i dont think you realize the idiocy in your statement . . . agricultural items can be used as weapons that is true but then again so can a pencil
|
|
|
|
|
|
| OT: Political IQ Test [message #65362] |
Fri, 06 February 2004 20:09 |
 |
SuperFlyingEngi
Messages: 1756
Registered: November 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
Hey Crimson, I looked over your "poster" again, and realizing I didn't do it full justice simply saying it was a load of B.S. Here's a little more in-depth view in to just how wrong your dad was:
"Whitewatergate"
A complex ponzi scheme
No, the issue (for which the Clintons were exonerated, as you no doubt remember) was about a loan, not a ponzi scheme. Foolish rumors were circulating (more about those foolish rumors below), so Clinton appointed a independent counsel in 1994 to clear things up in a way that no one could argue with. Got that? Clinton appointed the independent counsel.
involving real estate and Madison Guaranty S&L ending with 18 felony counts and up to 3 years in prison for some of the principles.
Up to three years! Goodness. If you think the sentence contributes something, let's ask what some of those other 14, not 18, sentences were. Suspended. Suspended. 21 days. (21 days! For this we paid $40 million!?)
Did you think the Clintons were found guilty? Let's ask the minority counsel of the Whitewater committee, Richard Benveniste, what he thinks. "It didn't surprise me that there was nothing illegal, much less noteworthy, about Whitewater." [Check the quote with google.]
One of the "Whitewater" convicted, David Hale, was a witness for KennethStarr! He was that figure of legend, the crook who sees the error of his ways and corrects his sins by making a deal with the prosecutor to turn in someone else.
The others? Who were they? Can you name one besides the MacDougals? They were people Clinton never even _heard_ of, who had as much to do with Whitewater as Monica Lewinsky did. They were all the bad people Starr could find who had ever done business with anyone who had ever done business with people who had done business with Clinton. Starr rounded them up and dropped the boom on them so that he could claim convictions in the "Whitewater case." _Three_ of the convictions were connected in any way with Whitewater. None were connected in any way with the Clintons. Even MacDougal's fraud conviction had nothing to do with the Clintons.
The whole thing would have been a vicious joke, except that it cost $40 million. Or to put it another way, $40 million was transferred from the public treasury and converted into a lying Republican campaign ad. For which, in the opinion of thinking people, at least several Republicans should have been hanged.
"Foster's files"
Allegedly
What is this "allegedly"? Do you know who made these "allegations"? I do. He wrote a book about it, and you really need to read it. It's called "Blinded by the Right," by the scabrous David Brock. He was hired to make up lies about the Clintons by a truly disgusting being called Richard Scaife, who financed the anti-Clinton industry. Sit around a table, make up lies, spread them far and wide, ride out the debunking, then spread the same lies again. Over and over and over. It wasn't as if we needed Brock to write his book to know about it. But then Brock felt Jesus tap on his shoulder and in the consuming flame of humiliation, Brock confessed his crimes in his book. That's a Republican thing, apparently. Give yourself over to wickedness, and then when some crisis occurs in your life and you finally hear the Old Man tapping his feet, confess and beg forgiveness. It's called "doing a Lee Atwater." (If you don't get it, google "Lee Atwater deathbed." Or "Reagan political director deathbed beg forgiveness")
many files were removed from Vince Foster's White House office shortly after his death. Access to the office was denied authorities, and while White House Staffers denied removing files several of the Secret Service officers on duty stated that files were being removed.
This is all nonsense. Chief White House counsel Bernard Nussbaum removed files relating to the Clintons after Foster killed himself. With Foster dead, the files were the responsibility of the White House counsel. What does it mean?! What does it mean?! It means Nussbaum was doing his job. In the presence, as you point out, of Secret Service officers.
Why is this a scandal? Because David Brock and the beast Scaife spread lies about the story, ranging from "stolen files" for anyone foolish enough to believe it, to "Hillary killed Foster" for anyone insane enough to believe it. It's still going on. You're part of it.
Allegedly many of the Clinton's business and personal files had been kept there, by their personal attorney, Vince Foster.
Not their personal attorney. Deputy White House counsel. Worked for Nussbaum.
"Missing Billing Records"
Allegedly, Hillary Clinton was not able to produce the subpoenaed Rose Law Firm records
Not allegedly. She was unable to produce them. Didn't know where they were. What were they? Sheets listing what hours she had billed for various jobs. Quick, where is your time card from February 19, 1994? Produce it or be damned.
that detailed her denied involvement in the Whitewater/Castle Grande real estate scandal
Jaysus, they didn't "detail her involvement"! When they were found they exonerated her! Starr _got_ the records, and to his disgust, they revealed exactly what Hillary Clinton said they would reveal.
until days before the statute of limitations expired. The documents found in the private quarters at the White House with Hillary's fingerprints on them.
Of _course_ they had her fingerprints on them! They were her billing records! Surely you know how they got lost? Everyone knows this. White House assistant Carolyn Huber had filed them, then realized they were what everyone was looking for. Starr wept with frustration when he realized the whole thing was claptrap.
There's this wierd junkie with a radio show who keeps retelling this story without telling the whole story. Maybe that's where you heard it. He's not reliable.
"No Justice"
With crucial information either 'hidden', 'lost', or 'destroyed', & silent witnesses with blind loyalties, the whole truth about the Clinton's role in Whitewater may never be fully known.
glub glub glub. It was a $40 million campaign ad by a Republican majority evil enough to steal that much and push it that far.
"Hubblegate"
Allegedly Webster Hubble was rewarded for his silence with approximately $500,000 in 'consulting fees'
Independent counsel Robert Ray (successor to Starr) threw this one in the garbage. It was bunk. You'll want to read the final report on the Whitewater investigation turned over on 9/20/2000. You seem not to have heard that the Clintons were exonerated on every charge, with no exceptions. After a $40 million investigation.
"Studentgate"
Allegedly two former students of Clinton's law classes made controversial decisions that favored their old professor. One decision in the Paula Jones civil suit,
Your ignorance is starting to get on my nerves. The former student was Judge Susan Webber Wright. She's the judge who, controversially, ruled Clinton in contempt for lying about Monica Lewinsky. Are all your facts going to be this sound? "Former student favors old professor by ruling him in contempt." If this is your ammunition about "scandals," you're in desperate shape.
the other in an RTC criminal referral back in 1983.
Did you just make this one up?
I can't help noticing that last week VP Cheney, with a case about to be ruled on in the United States Supreme Court, took one of the Supreme Court justices on a duck-hunting trip, paying for his plane ticket (NY Times). He also _allegedly_ gave the Justice $500,000 to rule in Cheney's favor. The case is important, because it could reveal that Dick Cheney--ready now?--Dick Cheney killed Vince Foster!
"Cattlegate"
Hillary Rodham Clinton's friend Jim Blair, lawyer for Dan Tyson, Tyson Foods, was able to turn $1000.00 into almost $100,000.00 in just 9 months in the commodities futures market for Hillary.
The futures wasn't even a scandal. That's what happens in commodities markets. A scandal is when George W. Bush is given $600,000 by Harken Energy and $100,000 a year for nothing--except that his father is president. Then he borrows $100,000 from Harken at 3 points below market, with the very strange provision that if the loan tanks, the _lender_ will pay it back, then he discovers that _Harken_ is going to tank, so he ditches all his stock for 800 large, then someone tells him about insider trading, so he declines to report the sale to the SEC as required by law.
Why didn't the SEC prosecute? After all, an SEC memo confirms a finding that Bush broke the law. The decision to prosecute SEC cases is made by the SEC general counsel, who at the time was James Doty. Who conveniently enough was...George W. Bush's lawyer! Doty decided no prosecution was required. That was OK with his boss, SEC chairman Richard Breeden, who was--conveniently enough!--deputy counsel to George Bush Sr., when he was vice president, and was made SEC chairman by Bush Sr as president.
Isn't that _disgusting_!!
"Lincoln Bedroomgate"
Clinton rewarded high dollar contributors with overnight visits in the Lincoln 'bed & breakfast' bedroom.
Know who sleeps there now? High dollar contributors to Bush. That's what presidents do with the Lincoln bedroom. It's the White House guest room. Where guests sleep.
The rest of your list is too tired and stupid to bother answering. And they've each been debunked 500 times elsewhere. You know about google? Type http://www.google.com and then type in the important words from each of your foolish entries below to read what really happened. It's easy! You don't have to be such a dupe anymore!
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." -- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect "domestic security." Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent. --U.S. Supreme Court decision (407 U.S. 297 (1972)
The Liberal Media At Work
An objective look at media partisanship
|
|
|
|
| OT: Political IQ Test [message #65373] |
Fri, 06 February 2004 22:53 |
|
NukeIt15
Messages: 987
Registered: February 2003
Location: Out to lunch
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| Quote: |
But then again, the UN defines the WMD's as those made specifically for mass destruction, not weapons that you put on your lawn to encourage growth.
But then you said it best...
Quote:
Improvised weapons can be obtained by legal means, and are legal right up until you assemble them
|
That's what I was trying to point out- we may never know what exactly he was capable of, simply because the weapons may be improvised rather than "official" weapons. You can't arrest someone based on what they COULD do with something, even if you know that they WOULD do it. The thing is, the statement that Iraq had NO WMD capabilities, with all those nerve and blister agents sitting around, is pure bull. Saddam HAD the capability, but it was not in the form anyone was expecting.
Unfortunately, the ability of a person like Saddam to produce such weapons apparently does not equate to a threat in most peoples' minds, nor do they see that as justification for an invasion. You have to watch him use one first.[/sarcasm] :rolleyes:
The invasion of Iraq was NOT started under false pretenses. The administration and the CIA are both being stupid by caving in to the negative media pressure and presenting a false apology. Lies may have been told; that is the nature of intelligence- you don't tell people all of what you know, because that would be a severe security breach. The administration has done nothing wrong that I can see besides apologizing for a mistake which was not made.
"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived of the use of them." - Thomas Paine
Remember, kids: illiteracy is cool. If you took the time to read this, you are clearly a loser who will never get laid. You've been warned.
|
|
|
|
| OT: Political IQ Test [message #65395] |
Sat, 07 February 2004 04:09 |
|
Crimson
Messages: 7430
Registered: February 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Karma: 0
|
General (5 Stars)
ADMINISTRATOR |
|
|
| SuperFlyingEngi |
Hey Crimson, I looked over your "poster" again, and realizing I didn't do it full justice simply saying it was a load of B.S. Here's a little more in-depth view in to just how wrong your dad was:
"Whitewatergate"
A complex ponzi scheme
No, the issue (for which the Clintons were exonerated, as you no doubt remember) was about a loan, not a ponzi scheme. Foolish rumors were circulating (more about those foolish rumors below), so Clinton appointed a independent counsel in 1994 to clear things up in a way that no one could argue with. Got that? Clinton appointed the independent counsel.
|
Isn't it interesting that if Clinton appoints a counsel to look into a matter that will save or fry his ass, it's good of him, and when Bush appoints a counsel to investigate the failure of intelligence in WMD which, regardless of the outcome, won't be a CRIME, we can't trust the counsel?
Hmm...
As for the rest, I still trust 450 hours of research over your google queries that pretty much just say "nuh uh those were lies cooked up by those dirty rotten republicans". But I'll consult with my dad and see what he has to say about that. I can already find a couple questionable logic flaws in your reply, but I'd rather do the respect of a full rebuttal.
I'm the bawss.
|
|
|
|
| OT: Political IQ Test [message #65414] |
Sat, 07 February 2004 09:27 |
Llama Man 451
Messages: 79
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
crimson you would have maybe made a good pint between clinton and bush but unfortumnately, clinton wasnt the one who started to WARS one of them for no good reason which is sightly didfferent than a "scandal" that never really happened. also clintons cost 40 million where george bush's cost something like 356 milllion which is another slight difference in my book. youd think a conservative of all people would realize that. lets look at the base word of conservative CONSERVE lets look this up shall we?
To use carefully or sparingly, avoiding waste: kept the thermostat lower to conserve energy.
that definately does not match the whole lets blow away 356 million dollars thing.
by the way if you want to check that definiton go to http://www.dictionary.com it is letter b. on the first entry
|
|
|
|
|
|
| OT: Political IQ Test [message #65438] |
Sat, 07 February 2004 12:27 |
Llama Man 451
Messages: 79
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
if conservatives are so into old traditions what the fuck happened to the constitution?????
"You all stare but you'll never see/ There's someting inside me" - Corey Taylor
Life is strange when you must lock your door in fear of your cat
Sometimes when I'm all alone I stare at my goldfish, and think about how much I hate fishticks, then I realize that I don't have a goldfish.
There is a fair chance that at this moment I am being hunted by a demonic monkey from Central America. Please don't tell him I've been here. Please. I don't know what he wants.
|
|
|
|
| OT: Political IQ Test [message #65440] |
Sat, 07 February 2004 12:38 |
pimp boy joe
Messages: 12
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
you fucking republican bitches!!!!! whyd you fuck up our government!!! god, its not clinton fauly he go serviced, but it is george bushes fault that he snorted too much crack and that his dad was so damn rich that he got to go to yale, evn though he fucking flunked out he still got to go, good job destroying the enviornment and ruining everyhting the deomcrats have ever done for us!!! you guys are probably all catholics!!!!! catholicism sucks!!1 your stupid popes rape children you sick bastards, i bet your all duke fans!! well you know what duke can suck my balls!!!!!! i fucking hat duke!!! FUK THEM GODDAM THEMM I HATE THEM SOO MUCH THEY RUINED MY LIFE !!!!!! fuck republicans!!!!! fcuk all you republican bastards that post stuff on here i fucking hate and go to hell!!! . . .. BITCH ILL BE BACK
Catholics = racist stuck in the past child child molestors
Republicans = mother fucking retards that are ignorant.
Duke fans = duesh bags
Since all duke fans are republican, and allrepublicans are catholic:
You republicans are racist stuck in the past child molesting ignorant mother fucking retard duesh bags
Fuck yeah you guys suck
|
|
|
|
| OT: Political IQ Test [message #65444] |
Sat, 07 February 2004 13:10 |
 |
bigejoe14
Messages: 1302
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
I am interested in knowing how the Republican party "ruined your life". Please pimp boy joe, tell us.
WHATEVER, FAGGOT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| OT: Political IQ Test [message #65501] |
Sat, 07 February 2004 19:23 |
pimp boy joe
Messages: 12
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
See here's how i see it. Republicans suck, and bitches such as the people how said i have bad grammer etc. can suck my balls. I don't care what you guys say. i'm still going to go on pimpin'. For all i care you guys can suck michael jackson's balls. fuck you guys, i hate you guys. You think you're all great, and high and mighty. Well, in my book you don't have to be rich, and republican, and snotty, and stuck up, and obnocscious, and pompous to be great. You do have to be smart, and maybe give a damn about other people in the world. I got news for you republican bastards, you suck, you suck balls, you think people aren't as good as you just beecause they are a little less well to do. The whole world doesn't revolve around you, you jackassed bitches. I've seen the sight, republican guys like you are gettin' shown up left and right by llama man, and superflyingengi. I wish i knew them. I guess i'll end on a good note. You guys keep doing what you do best (republicans), which is getting made fools of, please, because it's funny.Have a good one assholes. 
Catholics = racist stuck in the past child child molestors
Republicans = mother fucking retards that are ignorant.
Duke fans = duesh bags
Since all duke fans are republican, and allrepublicans are catholic:
You republicans are racist stuck in the past child molesting ignorant mother fucking retard duesh bags
Fuck yeah you guys suck
|
|
|
|
| OT: Political IQ Test [message #65502] |
Sat, 07 February 2004 19:37 |
 |
Nodbugger
Messages: 976
Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| pimp boy joe |
See here's how i see it. Republicans suck, and bitches such as the people how said i have bad grammer etc. can suck my balls. I don't care what you guys say. i'm still going to go on pimpin'. For all i care you guys can suck michael jackson's balls. fuck you guys, i hate you guys. You think you're all great, and high and mighty. Well, in my book you don't have to be rich, and republican, and snotty, and stuck up, and obnocscious, and pompous to be great. You do have to be smart, and maybe give a damn about other people in the world. I got news for you republican bastards, you suck, you suck balls, you think people aren't as good as you just beecause they are a little less well to do. The whole world doesn't revolve around you, you jackassed bitches. I've seen the sight, republican guys like you are gettin' shown up left and right by llama man, and superflyingengi. I wish i knew them. I guess i'll end on a good note. You guys keep doing what you do best (republicans), which is getting made fools of, please, because it's funny.Have a good one assholes.
|
Id reply to this, but its just a bunch of non-sense. Why is he even on here? This board does have a teen rating.
|
|
|
|
| OT: Political IQ Test [message #65504] |
Sat, 07 February 2004 19:52 |
pimp boy joe
Messages: 12
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Hey republicans check this song out. Man, i really thought that it was a masterpiece. That's one of the reason's i'm posting it, and to piss you guys off. You're responses are really funny to laugh at. Bad grammer, bad spelling, ouch you guys that really hurt, i started crying, and... and well, no i didn't start crying, because those are the lamest comebacks that i've ever heard. Anyways, here's the song.
bush is sniffin' crack,
maybe shootin' smack
goin' to war with Iraq
man that's whack,
Maybe bush is bin laden,
what's he been hidin',
the drug laws he's not obidin',
man that's whack,
HE'S REALLY NOT A GREAT PRESIDENT,
LOOK AT THE ECONOMY, SEE THAT BIG DENT,
BY 2005 MOST OF HIS FAMILY MONEY IS GONNA BE SPENT
(probably on crack)
MAN...THAT'S WHACK.
Brilliant, isn't it. Ithought that you'd like it. I found it right ... off the top of my head, yep thats right, bush's that easy to make fun of. Bush is such are retard, as a matter of fact so is the rest of the republican party, for voting for him. One last thing, all you republican WANGSTA'S better shutt the fuck up, and stop fakin'. Until next time I'm gonna keep pimpin'. Have a good one, you stupid fucks. 
Catholics = racist stuck in the past child child molestors
Republicans = mother fucking retards that are ignorant.
Duke fans = duesh bags
Since all duke fans are republican, and allrepublicans are catholic:
You republicans are racist stuck in the past child molesting ignorant mother fucking retard duesh bags
Fuck yeah you guys suck
|
|
|
|
| OT: Political IQ Test [message #65506] |
Sat, 07 February 2004 20:03 |
|
|
A) I am a Libertarian
B) You should talk about bad grammar.
C) Didn't you say you were going to "end on a good note?"
D) Please post something with value.
God is the "0wnage". Plain and Simple.
Visit http://www.theoriginalmrbob.com
"If there's one freak to be, it's a Jesus freak"
All your base are belong to us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| OT: Political IQ Test [message #65510] |
Sat, 07 February 2004 20:18 |
pimp boy joe
Messages: 12
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
maybe i wasn't talking about you mr.bob, ever figure that one out, the ten million times i said i hate REPUBLICANS. 
Catholics = racist stuck in the past child child molestors
Republicans = mother fucking retards that are ignorant.
Duke fans = duesh bags
Since all duke fans are republican, and allrepublicans are catholic:
You republicans are racist stuck in the past child molesting ignorant mother fucking retard duesh bags
Fuck yeah you guys suck
|
|
|
|
| OT: Political IQ Test [message #65511] |
Sat, 07 February 2004 20:24 |
|
NukeIt15
Messages: 987
Registered: February 2003
Location: Out to lunch
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
| Quote: |
Brilliant, isn't it. Ithought that you'd like it.
|
Actually, that has to be the single most retarded thing I've ever seen. You apparently registered and started posting just so you could be a troll.
In case you haven't learned this yet, pissing and moaning and being an asshole does not help your case any- you ruin the credibility of those who you support by posting such irrelevant crap; nobody will listen to you while you're spewing flames out of your ears.
A few little tidbits to suck on, unless you're too busy "pimpin":
1. Not all Republicans support Bush.
2. Not all Bush supporters are Republican.
3. Not all Bush supporters are Catholic.
4. Not all Bush supporters are Duke fans.
5. Not all Bush supporters are rich.
6. Not all Bush supporters are dumb.
7. This statement is a contradiction:
| Quote: |
Well, in my book you don't have to be rich, and republican, and snotty, and stuck up, and obnocscious, and pompous to be great.
|
It is a contradiction because you are snotty, and stuck up, and obnoxious, and pompous.
8. This statement is a contradiction as well:
| Quote: |
You do have to be smart, and maybe give a damn about other people in the world.
|
It is a contradiction because you obviously don't give a damn about other people in the world.
9. No one has any great desire to suck your balls.[/b]
"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived of the use of them." - Thomas Paine
Remember, kids: illiteracy is cool. If you took the time to read this, you are clearly a loser who will never get laid. You've been warned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Feb 03 08:47:14 MST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01661 seconds
|
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
