|
|
|
Decreased Signature size :( [message #55079] |
Sat, 15 November 2003 02:39 |
NHJ BV
Messages: 712 Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
England |
Sir Phoenixx |
That's not "a bit overkill", that's overkill to a new extreme. 1 image in your signature is enough, 4 is way too much. Having 4 images that take up an entire screen in your signature defies the entire purpose of a signature.
|
Its not even that, its just fukin stupid.
Grapahics suck, two lines?! all you need.
|
I agree.
|
|
|
Decreased Signature size :( [message #55088] |
Sat, 15 November 2003 06:32 |
|
exnyte
Messages: 746 Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
Colonel |
|
|
cowmisfit | then what was the god damn problem???? who was it with the gay ass thing with it as 4 under each other taken up the enitre page??????? u right????? me to lazy to go back and check>>>>>>>>>>
|
Slow down there tiger. What I said is it comes up as two lines in Netscape. I mean that it does now. Before, it came up as 4 pictures stacked on top of each other. in 800x600 resolution, that was the screen.
American Cancer Society | Donate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decreased Signature size :( [message #55132] |
Sat, 15 November 2003 20:54 |
|
bigejoe14
Messages: 1302 Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
I say if you want a sig with only images, only have 2 images at 400x85 pixles, vertical and/or (If they don't stretch the boarders) horizontal. If you want a sig with a banner and some text, only one image, and 4 lines of text.
And there can be exceptions of course. (ACK being one of them)
WHATEVER, FAGGOT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decreased Signature size :( [message #55225] |
Mon, 17 November 2003 05:57 |
|
Titan1x77
Messages: 1086 Registered: February 2003
Karma: 0
|
General (1 Star) |
|
|
a signature should only be your name or something about you...Not a damn ad for every site you visit.
"But if the gameplay sucks, the looks don't matter at all." - Sir Phoenixx
|
|
|
|
|