My question... [message #48565] |
Mon, 22 September 2003 07:46 |
destruktv
Messages: 14 Registered: September 2003
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Crimson and Dante do you guys ever check your PMs?
Cheers,
D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My question... [message #49130] |
Thu, 25 September 2003 06:29 |
destruktv
Messages: 14 Registered: September 2003
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Was asking you a question Dante about renguard and offering to help in a particulair area. I don't know if I should quote the message here publicly, it might give people ideas.
Cheers,
D.
|
|
|
|
My question... [message #49343] |
Fri, 26 September 2003 23:48 |
destruktv
Messages: 14 Registered: September 2003
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
This is what the message content was:
One thing that is of interest to me in the sence of protecting RenGuard from crack/hack attempts is how it will handle a situation where someone finds out what the messages are that a client sends to the server and blocks the client using a f/w. They then create a program based on parts of your clients algorithm that sends the cheats clear, go ahead, data while using cheats. There are a few ways to inspect/modify the packets travelling by and even the client program directly on the run or when it is not running.
I believe I can throw in a couple of ideas on these issues and would be glad to help, if needed.
Cheers,
D.
|
|
|
|
|
My question... [message #49427] |
Sat, 27 September 2003 19:11 |
destruktv
Messages: 14 Registered: September 2003
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
Nice... Well the only way I can think of, to stop the playback attack in this scenario is by using cryptography and a nonce for communication between client and server. Thats the communication side of things, almost covered. The other aspect of the problem is protecting the program from reverse engineering. Protecting the program from a decompiler should be easy. However protecting the program from an OS level debugger can prove a challenge.
Don't get me wrong, just trying to be helpful.
Regards,
D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
My question... [message #49456] |
Sat, 27 September 2003 22:34 |
destruktv
Messages: 14 Registered: September 2003
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
"The funny thing is those same people say that *we* are obsessed" Blazer.
LOL, agreed.
|
|
|
My question... [message #49605] |
Sun, 28 September 2003 19:03 |
|
EnderGate
Messages: 97 Registered: August 2003 Location: Ontario, Canada
Karma: 0
|
Recruit |
|
|
EnderGate |
No-one can do the impossible, anything is possible.
|
It is a shame, anytime something makes one happy; it makes another spiteful of that joy. Cheaters are akin to terrorists, in that they require an unfair advantage. They do not play by the rules or respects codes of ethics.
They will look back on their life with much regret before their demise, for cheating ones way through life, will cheat oneself of life.
The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, understanding that defeat never comes, until one admits it.
|
|
|