|
|
|
|
Re: Antartica without the ice [message #481768 is a reply to message #481745] |
Fri, 07 June 2013 22:55 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4c00/d4c00c5bc5e1339668eda9f53e4e3eeb6f57a9d6" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fa4c/4fa4c45c77288328f54dbc1905282e765682314e" alt="Go to next message Go to next message" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3666/c3666d409f4ec7cd53b9a4d4e53ad2518ab8377b" alt="" |
Jerad2142
Messages: 3815 Registered: July 2006 Location: USA
Karma: 6
|
General (3 Stars) |
|
|
danpaul88 wrote on Fri, 07 June 2013 19:39 |
Omar007 wrote on Fri, 07 June 2013 20:32 | That has a lot more ridges and spikes than I expected xD
|
That's probably the result of the glacial erosion, huge chunks of rock carried in the glacier will rip up more of the surface as it *slowly* gets dragged along by the ice. It's the same reason places like Scotland are so craggy, since it was once under a glacier.
|
Must depend on size and number of passes of the glacier, get one big one doing it all and you end up looking like Bismark, North Dakota.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cb39/4cb3984cc5776efe21ba905d894699baf1edd976" alt="index.php?t=getfile&id=14719&private=0"
And don't fool yourself, those aren't hills in the background, just shelter belts.
-
Attachment: Untitled.png
(Size: 733.30KB, Downloaded 256 times)
Visit Jerad's deer sweat shop
|
|
|
|
|